Right Truth

The United Kingdom, United against…

 by Tabitha Korol

Tesco Direct, a United Kingdom supermarket has conformed to labeling produce imported from the West Bank, by Palestinians or “settlers,” in accordance with the British government’s official, but non-binding, recommendation of 2009.  In keeping with age-old Judeophobia (including 400 years of Jewish banishment, and England’s blocking entry to Jews returning from the Holocaust), England seems to have joined a financial, existential war against Israel.  The sharia-compliant unite in the non-violent boycott urged by a pro-totalitarian entity against a thriving, productive and charitable democracy.

 

The UK appears to have acquiesced to ignoring the legal boundaries that were established for Israel and uses armistice lines from a war that the Arabs began, but lost.  The Green Line, neither an international nor permanent border, is an armistice line, marking positions held by both sides when the final truce was called at the end of the 1948 war, and remained so because Arab leaders refused to negotiate final border lines.  The Oslo Accords called for, among other things, Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate a final border between the State of Israel and a future Palestinian state but, to date, these outstanding issues remain unresolved.  For England or the EU to take it upon themselves to force the Palestinian position on the sovereign State of Israel appears to be an act of aggression.  The Jews’ right to settle the land is “a legal right assured by treaty and specifically protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter. 

The “noblest deed ever accomplished for Christianity.”

The “noblest deed ever accomplished for Christianity.”[1]

By R.J. Godlewski

© May 27, 2012, All Rights Reserved.

 

“This knight of Christ is permanently on crusade, waging a twofold battle: against flesh and blood, and against spiritual powers in high places. He fearlessly advances, this knight on guard against both right and left. He has clothed his breast in a coat of mail and his soul in the armor of faith. Equipped with this double defense, he fears neither man nor devil. Go forward then in confidence, knights, with intrepid hearts and scatter before you the enemies of the Cross of Christ: you are assured of his love, from which neither life nor death can divide you…How glorious your return as victors from battle, how happy your death as martyrs in the battle!”[2]

************

            The title of this article comes from the words of Saint Joan of Arc, a proud if reluctant soldier in the Army of God, a warrior in the true faith of Christ. The quotation immediately above comes from the words of Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, the humble monastic reformer and mystical theologian who helped spread the Cistercian monks throughout Europe. Both the words of Saint Joan and Saint Bernard dealt with the honor accorded to the participants of the Crusades against the Turks; Saint Bernard specifically addressing the Knights Templar. These noble knights, far from the slander often imposed by modern academics and theorists, arose to safeguard the passage of pilgrims on the journey to Jerusalem. Furthering the words of Bernard, they sought not riches or families, luxuries or recognition and they honored “the bravest, not the most nobly born.”[3]

            The Knights Templar represented the Guardian Angels of a past gone era, whose armor bore more strength and courage than those bearing red berets in the streets of American cities today. The Knights of old sought faith in God, trust in Christ, and good will in all men. As with all creeds, all ideologies, and all religions, we can only judge them by the intent of the founders. The Templar knights sought to protect the poor pilgrims who sought worship within the Holy Land, long since invaded by Turks who more recently decided to attack Byzantium Christianity. Sacrilege thought today, perhaps, but was it not for the aggression of Muslims; the Crusades would not have materialized. The truest essence of Christianity is “the traditional Catholic teaching on the moral duty of individuals and societies toward the true religion and the one Church of Christ.”[4]The Crusades entered the Holy Land simply to take back for God what Muhammad had confiscated for personal glory and profit, fighting unholy fire with the fire of the Holy Spirit.

            Reza Aslan writes, “Islam, it must be remembered, was born in an era of grand empires and global conquests, a time in which the Byzantines and Sasanians – both theocratic kingdoms – were locked in a permanent state of religious war for territorial expansion. The Muslim armies that spread out of the Arabian Peninsula simply joined in the fracas; they neither created it nor defined it, thought they quickly dominated it. Despite the common perception in the West, the Muslim conquerors did not force conversion upon the conquered peoples.”[5] Yet, why, then, did Muslim armies sack the Church of the Holy Sepulcher? Why was Arab toleration of Christians “wildly unpredictable”?[6]Why did Muhammad massacre entire towns and order the assassination of dozens of unbelievers? In the words of French Historian Louis Bréhier, “the popes alone understood the menace of Islam’s progress for Christian civilization.”[7]First, came the threat of Islam, and then came the response from Christendom – several centuries after the atrocities began.

            It remains quite fitting that in the two greatest wars of human history; decidedly Christian America[8] chose to fight against emperors (World War I) and fascists (World War II). During both conflicts, the Muslim world largely chose to side with the tyrannies. During the earliest years of our nation, Muslim pirates along the Mediterranean chose to kidnap American sailors and hold our otherwise free commerce for ransom. Of the many Muslim adherents who served our great nation, no organized Muslim nation sided with the United States outside those anchored on the Western shores of Africa. If Islam were comparable to Christianity, then Muslims would stand united behind the United States within all of its endeavors. Instead, the Muslim ummah often stands silent at best and conspiratorial at worst. God seeks mercy, not vengeance.

            Christian America has always stood within the greatest traditions of the original Templars. Christian soldiers have freed people of all faiths wherever they have lived. No nation on earth has escaped the debt freely paid by American blood. Were it not for the great sacrifices of our soldiers, the great contributions of our citizens, and the great commerce offered by our nation, few Muslims would be able to make the pilgrimage to Mecca. Because of the first two blessings, America remains the most tolerant nation on earth. To accept all others and to literally sacrifice our bodies and our livelihoods so that others may live remains the essence of Christianity, a faith infinitely superior to any other system of thought within the universe. Our soldiers do not die in order to profit from sullying virgins in heaven. Our soldiers often die because Christ died for us. Christians – true Christians – never place limitations upon either the power of God or the Love He has charged us with dispensing as if through a fire hose.

            This weekend is, quite appropriately, Memorial Day weekend where we honor our fallen soldiers from whatever faith they hail. They shed their own blood so that the rest of us can express our faith, our thoughts, and our lives freely. Nowhere else in recorded history is there a nation as great and as compassionate as America. Our modern knights have ensured that no other nation can survive unless it emulates the success of thirteen little colonies who decided that God, Freedom, and Family were the greatest gifts any mortal soul could realized. From these tiny outposts within a brutal New World, arose a nation whose sons and daughters believed in this God to the point where our very first president declared it impossible to rightly govern any nation without an armed population, without allegiance to God, and without the Bible in hand. Knights Templar? No, American citizens. Let us keep the Crusades alive and American heroes honored. Such remains the “noblest deed ever accomplished for Christianity.”

God Bless America!

 

R.J. Godlewski (GOD LESS KEY) is an independent counterterrorism consultant, the director of the private International Nuclear Emergency Response Team [INERT], and the author of several novels, commentaries, and professional articles. He is also the author and architect of the Web-based Independent Counterterrorist training program. He is a graduate student of Asymmetrical Warfare and Security Management at, and holds a B.A. in Intelligence Studies (and minor degree in Area Studies – Middle East) with honors from, American Military University. He further holds an undergraduate certificate in Explosive Ordnance Disposal and is a veteran of both the United States Navy and Navy Reserve. His most recent article is “Financial Counterintelligence: Fractioning the Lifeblood of Asymmetrical Warfare” in American Intelligence Journal 29 no. 2 (2011): 24-33.

---

[1] John Beevers, St. Joan of Arc (Rockford, IL: TAN Books, 1974), 55

[2] Régine Pernoud¸ The Templars: Knights of Christ  trans. Henry Taylor (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2009), 16.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Catechism of the Catholic Church¸ Paragraph #2105.

[5] Reza Aslan, No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam (New York: Random House, 2006),  79-80.

[6] Diane Moczar, Seven Lies About Catholic History: Infamous Myths about the Church’s Past and How to Answer Them (Charlotte: TAN Books, 2010), 58.

[7] Ibid., 59.

[8] http://www.adherents.com/rel_USA.html#religions

 

Kansas gov. signs measure blocking Islamic law

(Fox News)  Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback has signed a law aimed at keeping the state's courts or government agencies from basing decisions on Islamic or other foreign legal codes, and a national Muslim group's spokesman said Friday that a court challenge is likely.

The new law, taking effect July 1, doesn't specifically mention Shariah law, which broadly refers to codes within the Islamic legal system. Instead, it says courts, administrative agencies or state tribunals can't base rulings on any foreign law or legal system that would not grant the parties the same rights guaranteed by state and U.S. constitutions.

"This bill should provide protection for Kansas citizens from the application of foreign laws," said Stephen Gele, spokesman for the American Public Policy Alliance, a Michigan group promoting model legislation similar to the new Kansas law. "The bill does not read, in any way, to be discriminatory against any religion."  (continue reading at Fox)

Chris Christie is Not Conservative

Christie Is Not One of Us

By Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review, my comments below the excerpt:

I feel something washing over me. I’m standing in New Jersey, so it’s probably red ink. No, wait a minute — it’s glowing ink! It could only be one thing: more conservative hagiography about the Garden State’s GOP governor.

Chris Christie is so not one of us that articles like “Christie Is One of Us” — a new contribution to the genre, from National Review’s Noah Glyn — are churned out regularly as the governor’s smitten admirers, from Ann Coulter to NR staffers, labor to convince us of what they’ve convinced themselves of: that an ostensibly gruff, internally milquetoast, progressive-lite, pro-Islamist Republican must be the second coming of Ronald Reagan because he has managed to make a basket-case blue state marginally less of a basket case. And “marginally” is the operative word. Glyn’s valentine to Christie is unfortunately timed. It was published just as Moody’s declared that Christie’s claim to have put New Jersey’s fiscal house in order is grossly overstated. More on that in a bit.  [snip]

To be sure, Christie is a very talented politician and a deft extemporaneous speaker. He has done some good things in a heavily Democratic state dominated by municipal unions. He is certainly, as blue-state governors go, better than average. That does not make him a conservative, much less the “consistent conservative” of Glyn’s portrayal.  (read it all)

 

I think the above article is extremely important for several reasons.  The most important reason is that Conservative voters need to educate themselves on the candidates, find out if they truly are Conservative. 

I can remember when Republicans were calling for Colin Powell to run for President.  What a disaster that would have been because as we now know he is a Liberal who voted for Barack Obama.  Not exactly a Republican and certainly not a Conservative.

I can remember when there was an outcry for Chris Christie to run for president.  His ultimate reply was that he would be ready to run in 2016.  Let's hope not, because in his short time in office we now know that he would not even come close to being a Conservative president.

I could go on and on listing new politicians that catch the eye of Conservatives like a shiny new object or a slick new toy.  After watching them work and listening to them speak we soon see that our initial assessment was incorrect and we move on to the next new politician.

I'm not sure which is worse, falling for the new guy and getting fooled or having a squishy RINO (Republican In Name Only) who has been around for 30 years forced on us.  Depressing isn't it?

Pay special attention to McCarthy's objections on Chris Christie when it comes to Islam and appointing and supporting Islamic supremacists, something we absolutely must avoid in the United States and something that could never be considered Conservative:

I have to say Glyn “purports” to address my complaints because, although he correctly says they are “my main bone of contention,” he studiously avoids describing them. As Glyn must know — because it is linked to in my post — I have laid out my objections to Christie’s (literal) embrace of Islamic supremacists in exacting detail. To summarize, not only did Christie appoint to the state bench a lawyer named Sohail Mohammed, who, besides slandering the Justice Department’s prosecutions of (now convicted) jihadists, served as a board member of an Islamic-supremacist organization (the American Muslim Union); as U.S. attorney, Christie also personally championed a Hamas operative named Mohammed Qatanani and, more shockingly, put his federal office in the service of that operative, in opposition to the federal government’s worthy effort to deport him. Reportedly, U.S. Attorney Christie physically embraced Qatanani, praising him as “a man of great good will,” at an Islamic center in Passaic that was closely linked to the Holy Land Foundation Hamas-financing case — which the Bush Justice Department was prosecuting at that very time. (Indeed, Qatanani’s predecessor as imam of the mosque was one of the defendants convicted in the HLF case — and Qatanani praised and prayed for all those defendants while calling for the end of the “occupation” by Israel and the U.S. of, respectively, Palestine and Iraq.)

Instead of outlining the extensive case I’ve made, Glyn changes the subject to Pamela Geller’s bracing declaration that Christie has taken the Garden State on “its first step to becoming a sharia state” — as if that were an accurate synopsis of what I’ve said. Was Ms. Geller’s statement bombastic? Well, no more so than Christie’s typically sulfurous outburst, upon being called on the Sohail Mohammed appointment, that those who dared question him were bigoted sharia “crazies” who opposed the appointee just because he is a Muslim. But regardless, the case I made was not bombast. It was built on facts that Glyn fails even to mention, much less attempt to refute.

What is peace between nations? - Watcher's Winners

The Council has spoken, the votes have been cast, and the results are in for this week’s Watcher’s Council match up.

What is peace between nations? What does it consist of and how does it happen? This week’s winner, Joshuapundit’s What Does Peace Mean Anyway? decided to examine that very timely question, with a glance at how it applies to the Middle East. Here’s a slice:

Peace is said to be a high priority, no matter whom you talk to.People crave it and pray for it, and rightly so.

This is a much more important issue, I think, than most of us realize, especially in these days when people use terms like ‘The Long War’ and ‘the peace process’ .Yet few of us, especially in the West actually stop to think of what we really mean by peace, and what you can’t define clearly is frequently illusory.

The Bible provides one definition, with the prophet Isaiah talking of a time of peace so profound that men will not only transform the arms of battle into implements of peace but cease to study the arts and strategy of war.

That’s obviously an unrealized ideal in the immediate future.

Islam is much more direct about the matter. Westerners are confused when Muslims say that Islam means peace (actually, it comes from the Arabic aslama, which means submission). To Muslims, who divide the world into dar Islam, the part of the world where Islam rules and the non-Muslim world, referred to as dar harb ( literally the house of war), peace is much simpler. It’s a condition where the entire world is dar Islam, exactly what Mohammed ordered his followers to strive for right before his death in 632 CE, according to the Hadiths.

If some Muslims talk of peace when they actually mean a time of dar Islam, it’s understandable that something gets lost in translation – sometimes deliberately so.

All gave some...Some gave all...

Monday, the 28th of May, at 3:00 p.m., millions of citizens will pause, in silence, to honor the fallen—they sacrificed their lives for the liberties pronounced within the Constitution of the United States, the Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights, all penned to give reason for, and to birth—a Nation.

  Celebrated originally on May 30th, the traditional Memorial Day date, Congress decided in 1968 to combine four holidays into a "convenient" three-day weekend. Those who fell in battle knew no such convenience, but indeed, they gave up their lives for us to enjoy freedoms such as the picnics and parties. It is important to remember the military graves with the flags, and consider dedicating a moment of our time at 3:00 p.m. to thank those who serve, and remember those who have died while serving.

All gave some...Some gave all...  (via SatNews)

 

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S PROJECTED PLANS FOR MEMORIAL DAY

Frederick William Dame

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S PROJECTED PLANS FOR MEMORIAL DAY

A Picture Documentation of Obama's Reality

This report presents Barack Hussein Obama's projected plans for Memorial Day 2012. As the reader will readily understand, Barack Hussein Obama has no knowledge of what Memorial Day means to American Patriots. As with every day in the year, Memorial Day is all about him! Without the first person singular I, and its associates pronouns me, my, and mine, Barack Hussein Obama would be a silent usurper of the Oval Office. However, after three-plus years of this buffoon, American Patriots know that such a situation will never happen. We must be ready for events that go far beyond the normal reality of the average American citizen. Yet, progressives will not be astounded at what Barack Hussein Obama has planned for Memorial Day. They support Barack Hussein Obama so solidly that they are a part of him until he throws them under the bus because he no longer needs them for his narcissistic purposes.

With this in mind, let us examine the proposed schedule that Barack Hussein Obama, his Michelle the bell (Yes, it should be spelled belle, but then the phrase would not have a ring to it – pun intended!), and the children, the poor children, plan on Memorial Day 2012. 

(continue reading here, at The Obama Files, images a must see,

http://www.colony14.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/obamamemorialdayactivities2012.pdf)

 

 

Obama's Marijuana Gang ** UPDATE**

**UPDATE**  Go here to BuzzFeed, you will be shocked at the images and detailed information on Obama's drug-filled youth.

Via Weasel Zippers

Obama And His High School Stoner Friends Formed The Marijuana-Obsessed “Choom Gang”…

Judging by Obama’s performance, maybe weed does cause long-term brain damage after all.

Via BuzzFeed:

Barry was quite the accomplished marijuana enthusiast back in high school and college. Excerpts from David Maraniss’ Barack Obama: The Story dealing with the elaborate drug culture surrounding the president when he attended Punahou School in Honolulu and Occidental College in Los Angeles. He inhaled. A lot.

A self-selected group of boys at Punahou School who loved basketball and good times called themselves the Choom Gang. Choom is a verb, meaning “to smoke marijuana.”

As a member of the Choom Gang, Barry Obama was known for starting a few pot-smoking trends. The first was called “TA,” short for “total absorption.” To place this in the physical and political context of another young man who would grow up to be president, TA was the antithesis of Bill Clinton’s claim that as a Rhodes scholar at Oxford he smoked dope but never inhaled.

Keep reading…

 

More at USA Today:

 

Along with TA, Barry popularized the concept of "roof hits": when they were chooming in the car all the windows had to be rolled up so no smoke blew out and went to waste; when the pot was gone, they tilted their heads back and sucked in the last bit of smoke from the ceiling.

Barry also had a knack for interceptions. When a joint was making the rounds, he often elbowed his way in, out of turn, shouted "Intercepted!," and took an extra hit. No one seemed to mind.

 

Convicted Bomber Brett Kimberlin, Neal Rauhauser, Ron Brynaert, and Their Campaign of Political Terrorism

Blogger Patterico tells his personal story of attck on him and his family.  QUOTE:

You’re about to listen to one of the most bone-chilling pieces of audio you will ever hear. At least, it was to me when I first heard it.

It’s a phone call that could have gotten me killed.

In this post you will hear that audio clip. You will also read about a months-long campaign of harassment carried out by at least three individuals: Ron Brynaert, Neal Rauhauser, and Brett Kimberlin — much of it directed at critics of Brett Kimberlin. This harassment includes repeated references to critics’ family members, workplace complaints, publication of personal information such as home addresses and pictures of residences, bogus allegations of criminal activity, whisper campaigns, frivolous legal actions, and frivolous State Bar complaints.

And finally, you will hear a comparison of one of those men’s voices to that of the man who made the call that sent police to my home. And you’ll read a declaration from a forensic audio expert comparing those two voices.

[snip]

THE NIGHT I COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED BECAUSE OF MY BLOGGING

At 12:35 a.m. on July 1, 2011, sheriff’s deputies pounded on my front door and rang my doorbell. They shouted for me to open the door and come out with my hands up.

When I opened the door, deputies pointed guns at me and ordered me to put my hands in the air. I had a cell phone in my hand. Fortunately, they did not mistake it for a gun.

They ordered me to turn around and put my hands behind my back. They handcuffed me. They shouted questions at me: IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN THE HOUSE? and WHERE ARE THEY? and ARE THEY ALIVE?

I told them: Yes, my wife and my children are in the house. They’re upstairs in their bedrooms, sleeping. Of course they’re alive.

Deputies led me down the street to a patrol car parked about 2-3 houses away. At least one neighbor was watching out of her window as I was placed, handcuffed, in the back of the patrol car. I saw numerous patrol cars on my quiet street. There was a police helicopter flying overhead, shining a spotlight down on us as I walked towards the patrol car. Several neighbors later told us the helicopter woke them up. I saw a fire engine and an ambulance. A neighbor later told me they had a HazMat vehicle out on the street as well.

Meanwhile, police rushed into my home. They woke up my wife, led her downstairs and to the front porch, frisked her, and asked her where the children were. Then police ordered her to stand on the front porch with her hands against the wall while they entered my children’s bedrooms to make sure they were alive.

The call that sent deputies to my home was a hoax. Someone had pretended to be me. They called the police to say I had shot my wife. The sheriff’s deputies who arrived at my front door believed they were about to confront an armed man who had just shot his wife. I don’t blame the police for any of their actions. But I blame the person who made the call.

Because I could have been killed.

The weirdest part of the whole thing was that I halfway expected this might happen. Because I was not the first one it had happened to.

I think it’s about time you heard the call that sent police to my home.

 

(continue reading, listen to video, see images http://patterico.com/2012/05/25/convicted-bomber-brett-kimberlin-neal-rauhauser-ron-brynaert-and-their-campaign-of-political-terrorism/)  

Spread the word.

See others posting on this below the fold, via Memeorandum

JUST THINKING Number 19

Frederick William Dame
(Exercising freedom of speech ... as long as it still exists.)

JUST THINKING

Number 19

Cardinal Donald Wuerl, the archbishop of Washington, D.C., states that the way ObamaCare’s contraceptives mandate religious exemption is worded, “even the work of Mother Teresa wouldn’t be qualified as religious. ...Contrary to America’s great tradition of religious freedom, embodied in the First Amendment, Catholic institutions will now be forced to act against their conscience and provide coverage for drugs and procedures they believe are morally wrong, simply because they serve people of all faiths or no faith equally.” In The Obama Timeline, Don Fredrick points out that "The religious exemption does not apply if the organization or charity provides assistance to individuals of a faith other than that of the organization. A Catholic charity can receive the exemption, for example, only if the recipients are also Catholics. Many Catholic charities serve Protestant blacks in the inner cities, and would therefore not be entitled to the Obamacare exemption."

Just Thinking: I think that I can put this in a perspective that the American mainstream doesn't realize. The following thought is important. The oldest religions in the world provide assistance to peoples of different faiths and from different cultures, all religions except one, which isn't one of the oldest and isn't really a religion, but a dogma, a dogma of evil if you will. That is Islam. Islam never assists persons of other faiths or from cultures that are not Islamic. To do so would be against the Koran and the hadiths of Mohammed. As such only Islam is entitled to the exemption from Obamacare. Could this be another method by which Barack Hussein Obama is assisting Islam, thereby making sure that Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, and any other Christian organization, slowly but surely, will not be officially qualified as religions by government decree, thus leaving Islam as the only legally defined religion in the United States of America, where there should be freedom of religion, but where there won't be? My logic tells me that this alone is grounds enough to make ObamaCare unconstitutional!!!

***

Walid Shoebat reports, "Effective immediately, the new French head of state (Francois Hollande) never again will allow pork to pass his lips...or the lips of his staff, other government officials, or foreign guests.  (continue reading at The Obama Timeline, here)