By Kevin O'Neil
Well, here we are again, another charming variation on the evil Jew canard. Whatever it is, from famines and poverty, to wars and pestilence, the Jew is to blame. A
UKIP Parliamentary candidate who rejoices in the name of Anna-Marie
Crampton has been suspended, pending an investigation, to the credit of
UKIP leader, Nigel Farage. Her misdeed? She aired the opinion on a
conspiracist site, 'Secrets of the Fed', that there are two types of
Jew; what she terms 'the real Jew' and 'the Zionist Jew', aka 'the
Rothschild Jew'. Apparently she loves the one and despises the other
with an undying hatred.
So far so good, not very promising, but we'll let it go.
However, she then descends Dante's gloomy stairway from the ridiculous into the airless realm of the obscene: Into the eternal darkness, into fire and into ice.
She
claims: "Holocaust means a sacrifice by fire. Only the Zionists could
sacrifice their own in the gas chambers." And the reason they did
this? So that the world would "feel so guilty and outraged....that a
Treaty would be signed to create the State of Israel as we know it
today." She maintains that the evil "Rothschild Jews" facilitated, nay,
succeeded in gassing, shooting, hanging and disposing of the remains of
6 million so-called "real Jews", a million and a half of whom were
children, so that a tiny nation could be established in the most violent
area of the world and in an area which has virtually no natural
resources whatsoever! 6 million innocents to gain this? And
the indecent concept that these mortal souls were really human
sacrifices offered up by their fellow Jews! The mind may reel in
horror but the heart sickens at such an outrageous proposal. On her
Facebook page she reaffirms, "It was thanks to them (the Rothschild
Jews) that 6 million Jews were murdered in the War." Could "thanks" be
something of a Freudian slip? I hope not.
Now, in case we feel
disturbed by her indelicate outburst, she goes on to assure us that she
is not anti-Semitic at all but that she is anti-Zionist. This, of
course, is a horse of a very different colour, isn't it? Isn't it? I
think not. Sam Westrop, director of Stand for Peace, said, "Time after
time, conspiracy and anti-Zionist sentiment is revealed to be nothing
more than thinly-veiled anti-Semitism." Hear, hear.
Unsurprisingly,
she doesn't tell us how to distinguish between the evil, mass-murdering
"Rothschild Jew" who will stop at nothing to achieve his ends, and the
benign, Tevye-type, "real Jew," nothing obvious to help us
recognise the counterfeit from the real, the malign from the harmless.
This is a grave oversight, just when she could have done us all a
favour, her batteries run low. I have to presume that successfully
distinguishing between the Jews is like the old adage about identifying
what is a weed and what a flower, cut everything down and whatever grows
again is a weed. This appears to be her line of thought: the ones that
died in the Holocaust were the good ones, the others were evil. They
survived because they were evil; they were evil because they
survived. I'm kidding, of course, but this woman has
a peculiarly pernicious turn of mind and I wish she would keep it to
herself.
The only certainty, then, that we have that the Jew is
good, that he is "a real Jew," is that he's dead. Am I being too hard on
Ms Crampton? Then, what about this. The "real Jew" is the one
who doesn't have the audacity to claim a place among the nations (this
is what has really got under her skin), he doesn't entertain unhealthy
ideas beyond his station, that he can claim that postage-stamp sized bit
of land just because his forefathers happen to be the only ones to have
ever really called it their homeland, and to all others it's
been nothing more than a byway to better places; until the Jew came,
that is, and made the desert blossom and then the passers-through
decided that they wanted it. No, the "real Jew" knows his place.
The stubborn fact that he has an unbroken tradition connecting him to
this particular patch of earth which goes beyond the Roman Empire, the
Greek, the Babylonian, the Assyrian, the Egyptian, means nothing, nada,
zip. The world will only suffer the Jew to exist with the proviso that
he "wanders", and keeps on wandering; if he stops too long anywhere, he
gets moved on, and that includes in Israel. We might let him stand for a
while with his face to the Wall, that's about all.
So, dare I suggest, that these are the ones who qualify as "real Jews" to Ms Crampton: the dead and the dying. Am Yisroel Chai!
(the People of Israel Live!) is an offence to this self-confessed and
boastful "Democracy activist, supporting peace, justice, truth, freedom
of expression." Why are these type of people always so toxic?
As
shocking as it may sound, I prefer the Palestinian muslim who at least
has the honesty to admit that he seethes with hatred for every single
Jew and will never rest until they are sent to oblivion and Israel is no
more. He has a quality which the self-congratulatory and dishonest
Anna-Marie lacks. He foams with hatred for every Jew, you won't convince
him that there are good Jews and bad Jews, no such nonsense crosses his
mind. To him, they are all descended from "apes and pigs." You know
where you stand with this hyena, not so with the slippery Anna-Marie.
One
more observation and I'm through. How do such people as this woman
presume to stand for high office? Her Facebook page is peppered
with conspiracy nonsense such as: acts of terror are perpetrated by the
FBI and CIA in order to gain control of the nation; HAARP, weather
control, strikes again; GMO's; GM grain; dead sea-lions; save the
Arctic; and, horror of horrors, "Israeli police use cuffed teen to calm
protests." We don't expect to see this drivel on the Facebook page of
somebody who aspires to a government position, however lowly.
I
suppose it happens to all erstwhile-great nations sooner or later.
Wasn't it Caligula who married his horse or made him a Consul or
something? Or did I imagine it?
Recent Comments