The West loves life and we love death
Charles Moore in the Telegraph today makes a very interesting observation. He says " The world is now governed by Mutual Assured Impotence". I assume he means mutually assured impotence rather than mutually assured destruction of the cold war.
Mr Bush and Mr Blair, obviously, are just individual elected politicians, so their fate might not matter very much. But I wonder if we are approaching a situation, to which Western civilisation is surprisingly unaccustomed, when no one can be said to dominate the world, so that everyone suffers the insolence of everyone else.When the Cold War ended, that meant that America had won. In many people's ears, the word "globalisation" sounded much the same as American supremacy. But once globalisation actually happens, that supremacy is bound to diminish.
Mr. Moore looks at world wealth, population, energy and we realize that this is truly a small world. Being connected with other countries, whether directly or indirectly, is not necessarily a good thing.
Think of military power. America has kit which can Shock and Awe anybody anywhere in the place attacked on the day, but that does not provide it with everything it needs against its enemies. People who don't like America, and don't mind about their own comfort and safety, can foment endless trouble, indulge in low-tech killing, and more or less get away with it.So whether it is the Sudanese Arab government killing black Africans in Darfur, or Hugo Chavez of Venezuela trying to call his region to revolt, or China letting North Korea go nuclear, or France abetting African genocide, or Russia throwing its weight about, or Hizbollah and Hamas sniping away at an Israel which can always beat them in battle yet never remove the threat they pose, or Iran undermining a democratic Iraq while building its own Bomb, why wouldn't they? What's to stop them?
Osama bin Laden planned his attack on the World Trade Centre partly because he was convinced that America was too weak and decadent to hit back. He was quickly proved wrong. But is he now, more slowly, being proved right?
Mr. Moore sees Kofi Annan and the United Nations for what it is and sees, " ... the ease with which evil can triumph while would-be-good men sit in meetings for too long." The enemy doesn't care about 'collective responsibility, global security, the rule of law, multilateralism and mutual accountability' like Kofi is preaching in his farewell addresses. The enemy believes "They [the West] love life," they declare, "and we love death." That is why the enemy thinks they will win.
No matter what the 'Annans, Chiracs, BBCs, Menzies Campbells etc.' of this world think about President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair's actions after September 11, 2001, Bush and Blair did the right thing in striking back. If we are truly in a 'life versus death' situation, as Mr. Moore and I believe, replacing mutually assured destruction with mutually assured impotence might just lead to death prevailing. How truly unacceptable that would be.
Even if the United States is required to act unilaterally, as we were accused of doing after 9/11, it is better than sitting here impotent and allowing the wicked in this world to win. Unacceptable.
_______________________________________________________________________
Open Trackbacks:
InMuscatine, The Des Moines Register Can’t Read
One Man Bandwidth, L.A. Traffic is for wimps: Guangzhou does it better…
Blazer Blog, We had a GM plant?
The Mice Man, Golden Earring - Twilight Zone
Peakah's Provocations..., What a fun week
Grandinite, Hard Rock
Free Constitution, 2A Carnival Tomorrow
123Beta, Open Trackbacks
Woman Honor Thyself, Nostra Aetate Open Trackback Weekend





















Thanks Butch, and glad you are feeling better Night Rider
Posted by: Debbie | December 19, 2006 at 08:54 AM
Trackbacks must be moderated and approved on TypePad blogs, Spree. I have been busy all day, so I have just approved all trackbacks sent to Right Truth today. It's not my idea, it's TypePad's rule now. Sorry. I do appreciate the link.
Posted by: Debbie | December 18, 2006 at 09:12 PM
Great Post!! I have been trying to trackback to it, but cannot for some reason.
Posted by: spree | December 18, 2006 at 03:28 PM
Hi Debbie,
I am feeling much better.
Say this is really quite some article and I agree with Mr. Moore, we had to do something and not just sit there sucking our thumbs.
I wish you a very Merry Christmas to you and yours.
Posted by: Night Rider | December 18, 2006 at 05:36 AM
"No matter what the 'Annans, Chiracs, BBCs, Menzies Campbells etc.' of this world think about President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair's actions after September 11, 2001, Bush and Blair did the right thing in striking back. If we are truly in a 'life versus death' situation, as Mr. Moore and I believe, replacing mutually assured destruction with mutually assured impotence might just lead to death prevailing. How truly unacceptable that would be."
I love my country, I love freedom and I'm willing to fight for it - preemptively, if necessary. Period.
Good post Debbie...
Posted by: Butch | December 18, 2006 at 01:56 AM