All-Qaeda in Iran and other news

As I read the news this morning, I am reminded how complicated this war against terrorism really is. The diverse countries, nationalities, religions, tribes who are all involved in some way, make it seem an almost impossible mission. But it's not impossible. It is absolutely necessary that we achieve victory. Some folks don't realize that not only is Iran a threat to Israel, Iran has been sheltering members of al-Qaeda.

Putting those words in print I know the anti-war crowd will respond with "here we go again from the neo-cons." But facts are facts.

... a recent report by counterterrorism experts at West Point suggests that, between 2001 and 2005, Iran harbored Al Qaeda's third-ranking official and director of military operations, and that he could still be operating there today.

The disclosures in last month's report, " Al Qaeda's (mis)Adventures in the Horn of Africa," from the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, are the first official government documents to acknowledge that Saif al-Adel, who is one of the FBI's most wanted terrorists, was inside Iran. Based in part on captured documents that were funneled to the government's Harmony Database, the new disclosures suggest that Iran was more complicit with Al Qaeda than the Bush administration has previously suggested. (more at NY Sun)

Most folks believe it's "too late" to stop Iran's nuclear program, so we will have to deal with it (live with it?). "Iranian officials have ratcheted up the pressure for negotiations with more direct threats - while their technology advances" -- CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk

Gabriel says the West should take the side of the Persians and the Shi’a, -- if they takes side at all. He points out just how confusing relationships in the Middle east really are:

All Shi’a Arabs in Iraq are not happy to be lumped with or dominated by Shi’a Persians. All Shi’a are not religious – see eg, the difference between Amal and Hizbollah in Lebanon. And even within the seemingly same groups, amity is not guaranteed: the secular, Sunni, Arab and Socialist Syrian Baath party has long been a mortal (and lethal) enemy of the secular, Sunni, Arab and Socialist Iraqi Baath party. (Read it all, by Gabriel at Owlthoughts of a Peripatetic Pedant)

Michael Totten comments "on a week-long exchange, hosted on their site, between Michael Freund of the Jerusalem Post and Justin Raimondo of antiwar.com.

... Freund and Raimondo set out to debate what America and Israel should (or should not) do about Iran, but their epistolary turned sour -- and quickly. My contribution is here, and reproduced below. I sought to address what I believe is the heart of the matter -- the nature of the Iranian threat.

Eric, new to the blogroll at Right Truth and author of THE TYGRRRR EXPREhttp://blacktygrrrr.wordpress.com/SS. writes about Colonel David Hunt & the JFK Plot -- They Still Just Don’t Get It. Go check check out his blog. He says, "First of all, we have to get mad. Then we have to stay mad."

The US military does a spectacular job. We need to let them do it, and without restrictions or touchy feely politically correct concerns. [snip]

We need to name the enemy. The War on Terror is a War on Islamofacism. It is a religious war. Those who wage Jihad have been bitter since the Crusades, and they need to be humiliated even more this time. We do not need to fight a more sensitive war ... (go read it all)

It is interesting to note that foreigners from Western nations, were killed in U.S. air strikes with local forces in northern Somalia this past weekend:

... we killed six terrorists from America, Britain, Sweden, Morocco, Pakistan and Yemen," said Mohamed Ali Yusuf, finance minister in the semi-autonomous Puntland administration. (Reuters)

To add insult to injury, we have Russian President Vladimir Putin using the term "cold war" and threatening another to point Russian nukes at European countries if they allow United States missile defense systems there. But as my hubby says, the Europeans understand the threat and they WANT Americans there.

As R.J. Godlewski points out in his article "Duelin’ Putin: How Vlad the Instigator disrupts peace and security throughout the world", Putin has his own problems with Islamic terror:

It is also worth noting that Putin tried in vain to portray Chechen independence as an al-Qaeda-like jihadist movement – there were no Islamists forces fighting the Russians when the war began, but they quickly started flowing in from Egypt, Algeria, and Saudi Arabia to name but a few. Doesn’t this sound a little like Iraq? Yet Putin would have the entire world focused on Bush’s Iraq than his own neighborhood. Fortunately for American soldiers, President Bush is taking his war a tad bit more seriously.

Imagine what success we could have against terrorism if countries could work together. Who am I kidding, American citizens can't even get together on this war.

See DeMediacratic Nation's article, "Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Offers Love"

... the Ayatollah noted that:

“while the Islamic Republic was the fruit of Shia teachings, the political system goes beyond any sectarian identity and that is why the Sunni Muslims of Palestine and the Shia Muslims of Lebanon have both pinned their hope on the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Let's be clear, if the Sunni Muslims of Palestine and the Shia Muslims of Lebanon are on Iran's side ... where should we be???

Comments

[Phil]

Hi Debbie,

Yes I know that is the facts that IRAN has been harboring Al-Qaeda, but you and I both know that Liberals never are concerned about facts, they all use emotions to base all their decisions on.

[Debbie]

BillT, good point. That's all we can do is keep plugging away and hope someone is listening.

David M, thanks for including Right Truth in your roundup.

Rastaman, taking sides in this will come back to bite us in the rear. But I'm afraid that where we are headed.

[Rastaman]

I thought it was already a given that Iran shelters Al Qaeda but I guess not. More accurately, the rulers of Iran are doing the sheltering and aiding. The Iranian people are in much the same position as we in the US are, being widely divided over government policies and with a large segment being against them.

The idea that we should take sides with the Shias is about as dumb as taking sides with any other muslim sect. They're incapable of getting along peacefully with each other, as this article points out, and even less capable of ever being in accord with us.

Nothing has happened yet to change my opinion that we should get out of Iraq and let them manage their population adjustment among themselves, while we apply ourselves to adjusting the population of Iran. Then after the dust is all settled we can move back into Iraq and finish what we started with less opposition.

Rastaman
www.IslamaNazi.com

[David M]

Trackbacked by The Thunder Run - Web Reconnaissance for 06/05/2007
A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.

[BillT]

"Imagine what success we could have against terrorism if countries could work together. Who am I kidding, American citizens can't even get together on this war."

Two things:

First, terror supporters are working together. There's a link between Qadafi, Chavez and the JFK plot, as my blog partner has just posted on.

Second, we have to become united through fact. You're hammering the facts every day and so am I. Just keep it up.

They can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but they can't fool all of the people all of the time.