USING TERRORISTS TO ESTABLISH WORLD GOVERNMENT, fact or conspiracy?
Bush has now set up a world government economic block on the plains of Shinar in Iraq with the construction and establishment of the Middle East Free Trade Association (MEFTA) headquarters built in Iraq at a cost of $592 million US taxpayer’s dollars. The MEFTA headquarters is a sprawling complex of 21 interconnected, blast proof buildings (reminiscent of the Pentagon) on 104 acres and posing as the US embassy and “foreign mission.” Even AlQaeda leader Dr. Ayman Zawahiri recently called for the re-establishment of Greater Assyria that includes northern Iraq. Bush is perhaps unwittingly complying with Zawahiri’s request.
Sounds far-fetched and like a conspiracy theory, but the previous quote comes from " USING TERRORISTS TO ESTABLISH WORLD GOVERNMENT", by Patrick Briley
July 26, 2007, at NewsWithViews.com. Here's some of the article:
Before the 9/11 attacks, the Saudi royals, including King Abdullah, were angrily demanding that Bush facilitate establishment of a Palestinian state in Israel, and the Saudis were paying the families of Hamas suicide bombers in Israel up to $25,000.Saudi royal government impatience with US action to work to establish a Palestinian state led to Saudi terrorists being involved in the 9/11 attacks. Those publicly named in news reports, 9/11 Commission and 9/11 Congressional reports as having aided the 9/11 Saudi hijackers in the US include:
Wahhabbist terror extremists in Saudi backed and controlled North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) mosques throughout the USSaudi bankers such as the one connected to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff, Saleh Abdullah Kamel.
9/11 Saudi hijacker bagmen associates of Saudi royal government officials such as Al Bayoumi, Al Bana and Moshen AlAttas (half brother of Bin Laden).
This August 1, 2003 article from the New Republic quotes senior US officials as saying Saudi Royal government officials were involved in the 9/11 attacks - Missing 28 Pages: 9--11 Congressional Report Says Saudi Government Involved. The article can also be found here:
[snip] It involves connections between the hijacking plot and the very top levels of the Saudi royal family. …We're talking about a coordinated network that reaches right from the hijackers to multiple places in the Saudi government.’"
In the aftermath of 9/11, Bush announced his "road map to peace" hatched with Hamas terror backing Saudi Arabian Wahhabbist Muslims and Saudi King Abdullah and to be carried out by the quartet of EU, the US, the UN and Russia putting troops on the ground for 42 months in Jerusalem. Bush announced his intent then to divide Israel into two parts, establishing a Palestinian state inside Israel at the request of the Saudi royals and Wahhabbists. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair has just been named by GW Bush to be the envoy for the “roadmap” quartet to the Organization of the Islamic Conference that has 35 members. Tony Blair, GW Bush and Bill Clinton are Third Way, New Age Communitarianists who really are Communists who believe in establishing a world government and unifying religions under the New Age religious belief system. See Subordinating America Under a Socialistic World Government.
The Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), that Bush and socialist Democrats follow, is fully behind MEFTA in Iraq being permanently set up as a regional seat of world government and economic empire. The MEFTA base is in the mold of CAFTA, NAFTA and GATT and is one of several regional global governance economic centers such as the European Union (EU) and the North American Union (NAU) that are leading to the destruction of the sovereignty of nations (including the US) and the creation of world government.
You will have to go to the source to read the rest of the article. Part 2 of the article, found here, deals with the Holy Land Foundation; Saudi banker and billionaire Khalid Mahfouz; the Oklahoma terror super cell criminal enterprise and network (OKC bombing); GWB, the RNC, and Tom Cole who made a highly questionable Tribute to Muslims in the United States that is posted on CAIR’s website in Chicago; Condi Rice; Richard Reid; the leader of AlFuqra is Sheik Jilani, protected by the CIA in Pakistan; and much, MUCH, more.
Sort of related, "U.S. TROOPS NOW FIGHTING FOR U.N. IN IRAQ?", By Cliff Kincaid & Andy Selepak:
Despite all of the hoopla in the press about major differences between the Bush Administration and Congressional Democrats, they are united on one critical thing—giving the U.N. a much bigger role in Iraq. And this spells serious trouble, if not defeat, for a U.S. Iraq policy that once held out the hope of victory over the terrorists. [snip]On July 17—one day before most Republican Senators voted against the Levin-Reed amendment with its pro-U.N. language—Bush met with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and appealed for a larger U.N. role in Iraq.
OK, what say you readers? Are we talking conspiracy here???
Food for thought:
"The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies -- civilians and military -- is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it…in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah." OSAMA bin LADEN - 1998
Other reading: Conspiracy Theories and Muddy Water Clears Through Stillness, at Islamanazi.com





















Yankee Doodle, I like to share new blogs or interesting articles I run across. That's part of the fun.
Posted by: Debbie | July 29, 2007 at 01:41 PM
I understand all about the wierd mood, Debbie. Read my post from today, and you'll believe me when I say I understand. :)
I really like all the links you put in your posts, by the way.
Posted by: Yankee Doodle | July 29, 2007 at 01:33 PM
"A.C., did you find the story about the crash of flight 800 this weekend?"
Yes, thanks Debbie. If Hannity breaks anything substantial I'll waste some time and comment on it tomorrow.. ;-)
Posted by: A.C. McCloud | July 29, 2007 at 10:58 AM
Yankee Doodle, I was in a weird mood with I posted this. There is so much 'weird' stuff out there, just had to share some of it. ha
A.C., did you find the story about the crash of flight 800 this weekend?
Posted by: Debbie | July 28, 2007 at 11:13 AM
Rastaman,
I gave my first impression based on the fact that 1) the Hamburg Cell dates to 1999, 2) some of the Saudis were in America before Bush arrived, and 3) this seems to discount all the previous work of AQ in the 90s. Saddam was also giving money to the Palestinian families and hated Bush. Why not include him?
The writer brings up the Fahreinheit 9/11 theory about the bin Ladens being flown out, which never happened the way Moore claimed. We know the entire family are not terrorists and besides, they could have easily pulled them all out ahead of time since, as the theory goes, they had no problem telegraphing their participation by using so many Saudis on the hijack team.
Heck, maybe they did it. All I'm saying is we've had a long relationship with SA spanning many presidents. If they were mad at Bush about the Palestinians why attack so fast? He had barely had time to get his cabinet straight. I'll concede that it's weird that Clinton couldn't kill UBL given all the power of the US Govt, but that might have been at Saudi behest (don't kill him because it will cause riots, for example). I've always thought if the House of Saud were involved they would have recruited Iraqis or Iranians to be the hijackers.
The Kingdom has also recently cracked down hard on radicals after a few westerners lost their heads. That had to tick off the local Wahabbists.
regards
AC
Posted by: A.C. McCloud | July 28, 2007 at 11:08 AM
Debbie,
I suspect your denial is part of the conspiracy. ;)
Rasta,
Under the influence of Wahhab's interpretation if Islam, much of the world is falling into the gap between what is said and what is done. If the Saudi king is weak, it's his own fault.
"The King, who also acts as prime minister, ensures the application of the Shari'ah and the State's general policy, and supervises the protection and defense of the nation."
http://www.saudiembassy.net/Country/Government/GovDetail1.asp
Posted by: Yankee Doodle | July 28, 2007 at 07:14 AM
Yankee Doodle... Ummm, no. Sorry but no. The Saudi royal family is weak and the Wahhabists are responsible for "interpreting and applying Islamic Law", NOT the king. It is the hated Wahhabist police who take care of that. The king is responsible for the beheadings but the Wahhabists make sure that he enforces Sharia law and beheads people.
Here, read this often-reprinted article, it will help you stay up all night: http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/SchumerWebsite/pressroom/press_releases/PR02009.html
Rasta
Posted by: Rastaman | July 27, 2007 at 09:25 PM
Yankee Doodle, thanks for the link and comments.
I never said I believed the article, I just said it was interesting and had some true facts in it, which it does.
I've never been a conspiracy nut, but Rastaman/Islamanazi and A.C. both like to dig into these theories, so I put this up for them.
It's amazing to see what some people come up with, toss in a few 'facts', and voila! Conspiracy theory. ha
Posted by: Debbie | July 27, 2007 at 08:22 PM
Debbie: Good post. But, we didn't address aliens, Elvis Presley, or what really happened to Jimmy Hoffa. ;)
Seriously, any time a group of people act in some kind of collaboration to commit a crime, you may have a criminal conspiracy. Organized crime does it all the time.
Is it so far-fetched to imagine certain political, business and other leaders have interests that coincide, and occasionally act towards a common goal, even if unwittingly or without formally collaborating?
Beyond that, one needs to research it, check the sources, and judge for oneself. Interesting post!
Thomas Hamilton: Agreed! ;)
Flanders Fields: You make some excellent points. The word "conspiracy" has been remolded in Newspeak.
Rastaman: This idea that the wahhabis have the king by the privates in Saudi Arabia only goes so far. The king is the nation's legislator, judge, and executive; he is judge, jury and executioner. His Majesty is responsible for interpreting and applying Islamic Law.
Read more at my blog:
http://stopislamicconquest.blogspot.com/2007/03/saudi-arabia-kingdoms-third-option.html
Posted by: Yankee Doodle | July 27, 2007 at 08:14 PM
"I'll never return after today's rant."
Hey Dave, Don't let the door hitcha where the good Lord splitcha!
Posted by: Thomas Hamilton | July 27, 2007 at 07:25 PM
Change the name of this site to 'BLACK HOLE BRAIN SUCK'. I kept coming back hoping to find something rational. All I find now is flailing and paranoia. I'll never return after today's rant. 'Conservative' and 'schizophrenic' are not synonymous.
Posted by: Dave | July 27, 2007 at 06:00 PM
Flanders Fields, thanks for the link and mention.
Rastaman, I knew you would like this post.
A.C. McCloud, I thought the article was 'bull' too, but when I read it all, there is some pretty interesting stuff, and bits and pieces are true. Makes one think.
Butch, Angel, and everybody, have a great weekend.
Posted by: Debbie | July 27, 2007 at 04:59 PM
Debbie, I have posted a link to your article and I would say that people should not automatically assume that this is a Bush or a 9-11 issue, or a left/right issue. It is a freedom issue for all people.
We have been taught to have reactions which we have to "conspiracy theories". We have those reactions even when it should be quite obvious that certain things do not happen absent agreements of various certain participants to act in certain ways to accomplish that which could only be done by concerted action.
We have become akin to Pavlov's dogs upon hearing the word conspiracy, the first thought is to disregard and label it "kooky" and avoid it. We do that even when we suspect elements of fact and truth in what is being said.
I am not a follower of the 9-11 theories. I haven't read all of the links here, but I will keep an open mind when I do so, along with a skeptical mind.
I have studied this matter of conspiracy for some time and have become convinced of the validity of conspiracies as well as the overall goal of many of the conspirators for World Government. I am cautious and anyone must be when reviewing the aspects making a conspiracy.
It is impossible for some to think that what occurs (partially, at least) in front of them is a conspiracy. It is too difficult for others who can't envision that a conspiracy can have a breadth and scope that can encompass their lives and that they are unable to view it. Those dismiss it, based on their prejudged opinion.
Posted by: Flanders Fields | July 27, 2007 at 04:34 PM
Ayup. There it is there. Conspiracy. Why does that word sound familiar? :-)
""Saudi royal government impatience with US action to work to establish a Palestinian state led to Saudi terrorists being involved in the 9/11 attacks."
"That's a hard one to believe right off the bat."
Why? The Saudi royals kiss up to the Wahhabists. They have to. The Wahhabists literally allow them to stay as a Kingdom so long as the Kingdom meets Salafist Sharia standards. Don't forget that Saudi Arabia is a total Islamist dictatorship. Osama Bin Laden is a Wahhabist. You think the ones in Saudi Arabia don't support him? You think he and they don't work together for common goals?
The single most important of the Wahhabist goals is to get rid of Israel and the Jews. The establishment of a Palestinian state is a huge step toward that goal, which is why Israel has never allowed it to happen. The Arabs will never recognize Israels right to exist as a condition of the creation of the state and the Israelis will never see it otherwise. The Saudis wanted Bush to force the Israelis to create the state now and get the "right to exist" later. Bush tried but was unable to bring adequate pressure to bear on Israel.
Then the attacks came.
Saudi Arabia is not a one-power government. The Royal Family is one power and the Wahhabist are another, and they both have to be considered when we discuss that countrys actions.
Rasta
Posted by: Rastaman | July 27, 2007 at 04:25 PM
Have a great weekend! I will be reading your posts through-out...
Posted by: Butch | July 27, 2007 at 03:51 PM
I dont know what to believe anymore Debbie..have a super weekend despite it all! :)
Posted by: Angel | July 27, 2007 at 03:20 PM
"Saudi royal government impatience with US action to work to establish a Palestinian state led to Saudi terrorists being involved in the 9/11 attacks."
That's a hard one to believe right off the bat. Several Saudis were already in America with Atta in 2000. From what I've read the Saudis don't really care that much about the Palestinians so long as they don't have to take them in as refugees. I'm thinking this one is pretty far out due to it's vastness.
Posted by: A.C. McCloud | July 27, 2007 at 03:02 PM