At War With Islam

At War With Islam

by Martel Sobieskey

(Posted here at the author's request)

America is at war with the religion of Islam. The key word here is religion. We American’s have a “mental block” that causes us to deny that we are fighting a religion. Take an atomic bomb write the letters R-E-L-I-G-I-O-N on it and we, gullible Americans, will welcome it as a religion. This statement is not entirely an exaggeration. Freedom of religion has become America’s “Achilles heel” stabbed through with the sword of Islam. From where does this “suicidal” freedom of religion “mental block” originate? It comes from our “knee jerk” compulsion to blindly believe that all prophets are extreme pacifists like Jesus. This blindness plagues the highest levels of our leadership, intelligence and academic communities. It is a national security disaster making it nearly impossible to protect ourselves. The killers are shouting Allah Akbar worldwide and carrying the Koran, yet we Americans refuse to identify Islam as the enemy.

Let’s call it America’s “freedom of religion ostrich syndrome”. Our enemies “love it” because they can destroy us by hiding under the cover of a religion. They blow us up, vilify us, file lawsuits, teach anti-American Jihad in their mosques and schools, while we Americans assume the fetal position because it’s committed by a religion. Even the FBI has been promoting Islamic sensitivity training, this tells it all. Does not such servile behavior prove that we have lost the ideological war, mental war, psychological war, war of ideas, war of words, and the propaganda war? Please heed my prediction: Every time someone calls Islam the religion of Peace, America is one step closer to defeat and Islam one step closer to victory in this clash of religions.

Fellow Americans this is a clash of religions, and you must stop denying that we are fighting the religion of Islam. Basically the war is Islam versus all other religions worldwide as required by the Koran. Since there are 1 billion Muslims and 5.5 billion infidels, this war will be easy to win if we “get with it” and clearly identify the enemy and “shout it from the roof tops”. Why don’t Americans do so? The shameful disgrace is that Islamic oil money has silenced if not “bought” America over the past 30 years. Steven Emerson’s book, “Jihad Incorporated” shockingly reveals the extent of Jihadist infiltration into America. He states, “Open societies are inherently and necessarily at a disadvantage in providing a secure environment.” Likewise middle east expert Dr. Walid Phares of FDD (Foundation for Defense of Democracies) and author of “Future Jihad” states:

“I have seen firsthand how Jihadist ideologies have systematically penetrated the United States . . . This web of ideological penetration is the most dangerous long-term threat to U.S. national security . . . The reasoning is rational: Once you control the mind, the body will follow.”

I agree with both Steven Emerson and Dr. Phares. The Jihadists and traitors within are controlling the mind of America; there is no greater proof of this than our collective compulsion which forces us to call Islam the Religion of Peace which in turn prevents us from designating Islam as the enemy.

In a similar perspective, Dr. William Gawthrop, (former manager of the defense department’s Counter Intelligence Field Activity-CIFA), explains it is a taboo to mention that Islamic violence has anything to do with the religion of Islam. Specifically he states: “Officials must first overcome the political taboo of linking Islamic violence to the religion of Islam, its sacred scripture, and the personal example of its revered prophet.”

In other words, this taboo requires one and all to blindly proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace, which is equivalent to saying that Mohammed was an extreme pacifist, just like Jesus. What a crying shame that our leaders and experts have become so intellectually dishonest and weak minded. Today’s Muslims, like Muslims of all time, emulate Mohammed not Jesus.

The problem is MOHAMMED WAS NOT A PACIFIST. Mohammed was a military tyrant who fought “hands on” in several blood thirsty raids, and mercilessly killed nearly all those who disagreed with him. It is a concrete historical fact that over a 10 year period, called the Hijra (622-632), Mohammed conducted 84 murderous raids proving he is the exact opposite of a peaceful prophet. Author Dr. Gregory Davis in “The Religion of Peace?” provides excellent insight into Islamic aggression.

Despite obvious facts, we Americans respond pathetically and irrationally; like naïve children we think, “How can this be? Jesus is a prophet and he was never violent, and since Mohammed is also a prophet he likewise must never have been violent”. Wake up America, Mohammed and Jesus were polar opposites. Don’t take my word on it. Please read, the 800 page biography of Mohammed (Sirat Rasul Allah) written by Ibn Ishag and translated by A. Guillaumne, it incontrovertibly proves that Mohammed was a military tyrant bent upon bloodthirsty worldwide imperialistic Jihad.

To know and understand ones enemy and to clearly identify the enemy is the primary dictum of warfare. Our leaders and experts have failed in their duty to identify the enemy. They keep calling the enemy “terrorism”. Terrorism is not the enemy. The enemy is Islam. Islam uses terrorism (guerilla warfare) as a method (tactic) to attack us. The enemy is the “entity” implementing the method of terrorism. For example, if someone is throwing rotten eggs at you, it is not the “rotten eggs” but rather the “person” throwing them who is the enemy.

It is an outrage, that the majority of our leaders and experts think like overly genteel and sissified school boys who are too spineless if not politically cowardly (P.C.) to call anyone an enemy -- no matter how blatantly obvious it is. For example, take Dr. Angel Rabasa and his colleagues of the highly acclaimed Rand Corporation, he states: “In the Global War on Terrorism, the United States is confronting a very different type of enemy: shadowy non-state actors that are not subject to traditional means of deterrence. . . It is unclear what targets, if any, the United States could hold at risk to deter attack.”

Wrong! Once again, the enemy is not terrorism. Rabasa proves his ineptness by stating the “Global War on Terrorism” meaning he cannot distinguish between a rotten egg and the person who has thrown it.

By refusing to identify the enemy as Islam, Angel Rabasa and Rand Corporation, have thereby swallowed the bait of Islamic deception by promoting a strategy called, “Building Moderate Muslim Networks”. This means they have unwittingly become Jihadist propagandists promoting Islam’s primary method for defeating us which is: the infiltrations and deceptions utilized by moderate Muslims. Sure, moderate Muslims are not suicide bombers, but they have accomplished even greater damage by manipulating our overly liberal laws and naiveté. This is why it is so terribly wrong to call terrorism the enemy, because doing so completely ignores the damage being committed by Islam’s peaceful invaders the so called moderate Muslims.

I do not mean to pick on Rabasa alone. Permit me to give the following two criteria for determining an expert’s competence: First: Anyone who calls the enemy terrorism rather than the religion of Islam is incompetent and should be fired from his job. Second: Anyone who calls Islam a Religion of peace is incompetent or an outright enemy propagandist or badly informed regarding Islamic religious conditioning.

Why have our leaders and experts become so blind? They are afflicted with the Oslo Syndrome meaning they are pathologically unable to evaluate the crimes committed by Islam to the extent they are going to get us all killed. Dr. Kenneth Levin in his book the “The Oslo Syndrome” explains that those afflicted with the syndrome live in absolute denial of the blatant fraud and egregious dishonesty that Muslims employ by making counterfeit peace agreements. For many, such relentless mockery proves that diplomacy has failed long ago and war is the necessary solution. Everyone should read chapters 12 thru 16 of Dr. Levin’s book. The pervasively masochistic behavior documented within proves that our leaders and experts have been leading us into defeat. The Oslo syndrome has now morphed into the Annapolis syndrome. Here we go round and round again!

Truly, we need face the fact that moderate Muslims are more difficult to find than “a needle in the haystack”. We are at war and the brutal realties must not be soft peddled. Please consider the following distinction: The militant Muslim is the person cutting the head off the infidel while the moderate Muslim holds the victims feet. During 9/11 the trade towers were the “head” cut off by the militants, while the moderate Mosque community “held the victim’s feet”. Please reflect deeply on this analogy. History proves that both militant and moderate Muslims are invaders working as a team to conqueror America. This is clearly articulated by Abdullah-Al-Araby in his book “The Islamization of America.”

Please mark my words, calling Islam a religion of peace is patently dishonest and the worst ideological mistake in American history. It truly is our “Achilles heel” as before mention. No wonder Dr. Paul Williams states in his book “The Dunces of Doomsday”: “The Day after 9/11, President Bush promulgated the granddaddy of all whoppers by saying, “Islam is a religion of Peace.”

I have great respect for President Bush and support him wholeheartedly because he is the first President having the guts to fight the Islamists since President Thomas Jefferson sent our Navy to Tripoli in 1803. The problem is President Bush has invalidated his own war efforts by this ideological error, that is, his administration’s obsession for calling Islam a Religion of Peace. The truth must be told: Islam is a Religion of War and the evidence proving this fact is piled a mile high right up to 9/11. A website site sarcastically named The Religion of Peace ( www.thereligionofpeace.com ) lists the thousands of Islamic murders and atrocities committed worldwide.

In conclusion, permit me to make this prediction: The war cannot be won unless we clearly identify the enemy as Islam, and the American government makes a formal declaration of war against the Religion of Islam. That’s right; this will be a new thing for Americans who wrongly believe that all religions are benign!

In numerous places worldwide the murderers are shouting Allah Akbar and carrying the Koran, yet we Americans fool heartedly provide unrestricted freedom of religion to Islam - oblivious to the carnage. This oblivion was the root cause of 9/11 and has sent us spinning headlong toward a nuclear Islamic terrorist attack on American soil which the Islamo-fascists have been bragging about for nearly 10 years.

Martel Sobieskey has 35 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, security personnel and police have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched Jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam, moderates included.

Related: Terrorist profiling could NOW include religion. Islam In Action:

But...but....President Bush said Islam is a religion of peace. Is this just a coincidence that Bush will be out of office soon, and now people are speaking the truth?

The Justice Department is considering letting the FBI investigate Americans without evidence of wrongdoing, relying on a terrorist profile that could single out Muslims, Arabs or other racial and ethnic groups, the Associated Press reported.

Comments

[Rudy]

That is why I no longer call islam a religion. Nor do I lend it the dignity of capitalizing its name as I do with Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, etc... The day is coming when islamic jihadi terrorists are going to push too far, and unlike 9/11 there will be no controlled, measured response.

[Francis W. Porretto]

All our problems with Islam stem from the mistake of calling it a religion. It is not. It's a program of world conquest with some absurd theological trappings, and always has been. (See here: http://www.eternityroad.info/index.php/weblog/single/a_terminological_mandate/)

A religion, by my lights, is something freely chosen by the operation of the individual conscience and will. Islam is as far from that definition as any system of belief could possibly get.

[Steve Harkonnen]

When Bush declared Islam as a peaceful religion, this is when I lost all respect for him because in my mindset he was capitulating and being an apologist toward the enemy.

Have you also noticed how the media avoids using the term "Muslims" to identify our enemies, but instead uses caveats "Asian youths", "disenfranchised youths" instead?

Great piece and well written; tells it like it really is. True, we won't win this war unless we start calling a spade a spade and quit being so damned apologetic all the time. Whenever I talk about it in the open, people realize where I am coming from - you can tell they want to say it with me, but have this wierd, inner fear, telling them not to. It's almost like something out of a science fiction novel, as if they are under mind control.

[Stormwarning]

And thus, I must consider both of my Muslim friends to be my enemy, is that correct?

[TX CHL Instructor]

Stormwarning: If you are wise, you will indeed consider your two muslim "friends" to be your enemies. If they follow the quran faithfully, they already consider you to be their enemy, following the quran's directive to only pretend to be friends with infidels.

[Stormwarning]

Whether or not my two Muslim friends follow the Koran or not, they are my friends (this is old ground since I've made this statement before on this site and been told that neither my Pakistani or Palestinian friend can truly be my friend - - - yes! by readers on this very blog).

I appear to be far more wise, however, than you, or anyone who ascribes to the beliefs as provides in Sobieskey's missive...and far more wise than anyone who does not accept that we are not "American's all" - http://tinyurl.com/5rhrg6 .

[fouse, gary c]

In the grand tradition of Iran's lunatic Ayatollah Khomeini (who issued a Fatwa against British subject, Salmon Rushdie), and the murder of Dutch Filmmaker, Theo Van Gogh on a Dutch street by a Muslim immigrant a few years back-comes this out of the Kingdom of Jordan: During the past month, a Jordanian prosecutor has filed charges for blasphemy and "contempt of Muslims" against Danish cartoonist, Kurt Westergaard, as well as 10 Danish newspaper editors who published the cartoons that infuriated the Muslim world and set off deadly riots across the globe. In addition, also charged with similar "crimes" is Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, whose offense was to make a short film (Fitna or Strife) that stated that the Koran incited violence. The charges against the Danes came in early June, while charges against Wilders came early this month. The warrants issued by Prosecutor, Hassan Abdullat, in Amman come as a result of a complaint filed by a Jordanian group called "The Prophet Unites Us". Thus, the Jordanian prosecutor has summoned all of the above Europeans to report to Jordan for trial or international arrest warrants will be issued.

Can you say "Chutzpah"?

Though neither Denmark nor the Netherlands have signalled any intention of arresting their citizens and extraditing them to Jordan, all of the affected individuals may have their ability to travel outside their own borders restricted if international arrest warrants are obtained. An international arrest warrant could be circulated within Interpol. On the surface it would seem implausible that Interpol would enforce arrest warrants on these charges (They do not honor warrants based on political crimes) However, given the cowardly manner in which many European countries are conducting themselves in the face of Islamic intimidation, who knows?)

In the case of Wilders (who is a Dutch Member of Parliament), he appealed to his foreign minister, a certain Maxime Verhagen, to summon the Jordanian Ambassador in Holland for a lecture on freedom of speech. Verhagen declined, stating that it would represent "interference in Jordanian judicial matters"!!??!

Meanwhile in Riyahd, the Organization of Islam Conference (OIC), a league of 56 Muslim nations, expressed "disappointment" that the Dutch prosecutors could take no action against Wilders based on "free speech issues".

So now, Middle East prosecutors are filing charges against foreigners in the West who dare to criticize Islam-and this from one of the so-called "moderate, pro-American" nations. Have you ever heard of such brazen arrogance? And what about the cowardice of the Dutch Foreign Minister who will not speak out and summon the Jordanian Ambassador for a good chewing out? At what point does any self-respecting nation tell these fans of the 7th century that, here in the West, we have freedom of speech, and we will never give up our citizens to some Third World banana republic (which Wilders has correctly called Jordan).

A note to the Jordanian prosecutor who is so concerned about "contempt of Muslims": You could go a long way toward eliminating said "contempt" if you would lock up the killers that are giving Islam such a bad name around the world.

The entire civilized world should stand shoulder to shoulder with the Geert Wilders, Kurt Westergaards and Salmon Rushdies of the world.

gary fouse
fousesquawk

[Debbie]

Whatever your views are, the one true thing is that unless we identify the enemy, we will never win this war. The fact that we are now going to "PROFILE", is a good step forward.

[Stormwarning]

Well, with that I can agree. Profiling is one of the only certain ways to ensure that when I go on an airplane, that it won't be hijacked or blown up. Its not a guarantee though, since there are plenty of "white guys" who can do tremendous damage when they wish (and often have).

[Ernesto Ribeiro]

If Adolf Hitler had created the Nazist RELIGION, verybody would respect him like Mohammed and Islam. or even more than that: ISLAMISM KILLED 270 MILLION PEOPLE. Naziism killed 80 million.

[Stormwarning]

Invoking Godwin's Law.

[Debbie]

Comment FROM R. J. Godlewski:

1.) "O people, know that you have committed great sins, and that the great ones among you have committed these sins. If you ask me what proof I have for these words, I say it is because I am the punishment of God. If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you." Chinggis Khan, 1220 A.D., in a crowded Bukhara mosque, addressing conquered Muslims.

2.) To Stormwarning: I commend you for your loyalty to your Pakistani and Palestinian friends. However, have you considered that your association may have delayed your ability to gain the TS clearance that you need to conduct your business?

3.) I might also recommend that everyone go back and re-read Mr. Dobrot's The Global War On Terrorism: A Religious War? piece which was included in Independent Counterterrorist training Module Four: Religion, Faith, and War.

--end comment.

[Stormwarning]

"Ronnie," considering that the application hasn't been filed, you're wrong, once again. Also, considering the type of work I'm already doing, and the access that I already have, you're wrong, once again. This is not the McCarthy Era when my associations will prevent things from occuring.

Your insights are revealing and consistent with the feedback I got when I asked a few questions.

[Grouch at Right Truth]

Sigh....

[Stormwarning]

Why "sigh" Thomas? To accept without questioning someone's acclaim is to perhaps be duped the claims thereof. The words were "twinky central."

[Stormwarning]

No less than al Jezeera has acknowledged that Obama is not a Muslim.

http://tinyurl.com/5bwd4y (Amy Proctor)

Further, once again, I state that casting a broad blanket over all Muslims is NOT an act of thinking people...Perhaps "just" people who are afraid.

[Atom&Yves]

I appear to be far more wise, however, than you, or anyone who ascribes to the beliefs as provides in Sobieskey's missive...and far more wise than anyone who does not accept that we are not "American's all"

Posted by: Stormwarning | July 05, 2008 at 10:07 AM

We certainly are full of ourself, aren't we Stormwarning? I presume you know for a fact that, in the unlikely event that islam were to attempt to overthrow America, your MINO "friends" would not hold your feet, while their rigidly islamic brethren slice your throat?

[Stormwarning]

Absolutely, with certainty, and without question, A&Y. Just as certain as I am of my certainty.

[Debbie]

Comment from R. J. Godlewski For Stormwarning:

[deleted], I still admire you for your loyalty to your friends. However, people are not like documents, especially those who subscribe to a faith that preaches "Soon shall we cast terror into the hearts of the unbelievers..." Qur'an [3:151] [deleted]. I, myself, have known both Iraqis and Iranians as very close friends, but they still subscribed to "blood of the clan" mentalities. Unless you're a Muslim, you will be treated with suspicion by those who are. That's just simple human logic. By the way, say 'Hello!' to all of my friends [deleted]!

--End Comment--