October 7, 2008 terror strike on U.S. greater than 9/11?
Terror strike on the United States set for October 7, 2008 or simply terror by internet posting?
From Homeland Security US
A posting uncovered in an Arabic language Internet forum is currently raising a few eyebrows in the intelligence community. The single posting, which is presently being scrutinized by intelligence officials, appears to provide detailed instructions for Muslims living within the United States, giving them specific actions to take before, during and after an upcoming attack in the U.S. The communication was discovered by “Archangel,” a well-known independent intelligence analyst active within the intelligence community.
The post was initially published on August 2, 2008 under the title “Commandments [Directives] Before the Strike,” and appears to be a sort of a conflict management guide, or instructions on what Muslims should do prior to the attack, actions that should be undertaken concurrent with the attack, and well as additional instructions following the attack.
The text addressing the nature, location and timing of the planned attack, although specific to the U.S., appears otherwise ambiguous. For instance, the timing appears to focus on the Tuesday following the end of Ramadan, which would be October 7, 2008. The nature of the attack is less clear. Although the author appears to talk about a strike greater in magnitude than the 9/11 attacks and makes reference to the possibility of it being nuclear in nature, the text references to the nuclear aspect of the attack appear somewhat muddled.
In terms of the location of the attack, it is clear that the author identifies both New York, as the financial capital of the U.S., and Washington, DC, as the nation’s capital, as being both desirable and affected. It is interesting that under analysis, the details of “the attack” referenced by the author are nestled within the text of instructions, rather than being prominently placed to serve as an overt warning as seen in the past. The relative subtlety in which the targets and type of attack was referenced is most interesting from a historical and analytical perspective.
SPECIAL REPORT: “Commandments Before The Strike”
- ALERT: Instructions for actions Muslims are to take before, during & after an attack in the U.S. posted;
- Message suggests activation of worldwide jihad following U.S. attack;
- Message indicates large-scale attack within the U.S., perhaps early October;
Read Full Article, thanks to National Terror Alert




















Looks like the attack greater than 9/11 is on the US Stock Market. Started on 10/7 and is still underway. If you have any $$$ this is a bit more than bullshit.
Posted by: Noname | October 10, 2008 at 02:08 PM
Fuc-king Bullshits.
Nothing happened, only some asshole timewaster's predictions.
Posted by: Someone | October 08, 2008 at 02:21 PM
From Debbie Schlussel's blog:
UH-OH Northeast "Intelligence" Network Steps In It: Fake "Terrorism Expert" Douglas Hagmann Admits Plagiarism, Fabricated Info
http://tinyurl.com/44vf3c
Posted by: Stormwarning | October 08, 2008 at 07:40 AM
Didn't hear about the meteor. The "can't post" was inadvertant.
Posted by: Stormwarning | October 07, 2008 at 03:02 PM
A meteor hit, does that count?
Posted by: Debbie | October 07, 2008 at 01:25 PM
Stormwarning: Not sure what you mean about not being able to post comments. As you know I don't ban anybody here. Every body and all views are welcome here.
Posted by: Debbie | October 07, 2008 at 01:16 PM
It's October 7, when is this supposed to happen?
Posted by: Barbara Roberts | October 07, 2008 at 01:07 PM
Do you all really still believe that some terrorists did 9/11??? By now it should be cristal clear that the American Government has a very evil hidden agenda all over the world.
Posted by: Techie | October 07, 2008 at 08:47 AM
According to VERY RELIABLE SOURCES, the reference to a supposed al Qaeda manual on blowing up public buildings is actually a CD-ROM found earlier this year, but believed to have been recorded in 2003. Further, federal authorities indicate no credible evidence that such an effort is forthcoming.
Apparently I am on "someone's" radar and can't post comments on the site. "We're sorry, but we were unable to complete your request - bX-w316iy." Computer glitch or "sensitivity?"
Posted by: Stormwarning | October 07, 2008 at 06:16 AM
i really hope there arent so many government failures to protect us this time. Thats what really caused 9/11 the evil terrorists had nowone to stop them!
Posted by: frank | October 07, 2008 at 01:28 AM
Ignoring credible intelligence (again) would be a huge blunder. But don't you find it interesting that the only "source" of this information is NIN? NIN is not considered a credible source by every single WELL-KNOWN counterterrorism website.
Is the US vulnerable to an attack? Sure it is! But, "restricted access" sources have no such warning. Believing it is one thing. Spreading it, is, well...
I trust that you will be relieved.
Posted by: Stormwarning | October 06, 2008 at 06:36 AM
It is now the morning of October 6. As you may or may not know, I have been closely following this story since I first read it here on Deb's authoritative site. This is the only terrorist threat warning story that Radarsite has ever covered.
There are several reasons why I chose to follow this particular article, one of which was the proximity and specificity of the date in question. Unlike so many of the nebulous warnings that we are so used to seeing, we will not have to wait weeks or months to see how valid this report is; we will know within two days whether this report is valid or not.
Of course I too looked into the credibility of the source of this info, NIN. What I found was not so clear cut. They are indeed controversial, but they have also been quoted by some fairly reputable authors, such as Daniel Pipes.
Whether or not to follow through on articles such as this one always comes down to personal judgment. I am not particulary swayed by the validation of "professional analysts", who despite their expertise have been of little help with predicting some pretty major events.
Also, with this particular prediction there has been some interesting ancillary evidence that something may indeed be going on here. I have listed this additional info at Radarsite.
Therefore, I have chosen to err on the side of caution and Radarsite has followed this subject closely and updated it every day.
What this episode proves to me is that we are -surprise, surprise --vulnerable. We are in a defensive posture, and we must take every threat seriously if it has any merit whatsoever. This of course makes us susceptible to false information and terrorist manipulation.
So be it. This is the world we live in.
The trusted sources I have developed seem to be taking this particular threat quite seriously, so I have followed suit.
I have contacted the relevant agencies on a few prior occasions and on each and every one of them they assured me that I was doing the right thing. This is the new world we are living in, they told me. We have to stay alert. We have to be willing to report a suspicion even if we know full well that it may never materialize.
If this date of Tuesday October 7 passes uneventfully I will not feel foolish, I will feel greatly relieved.
Posted by: Roger W. Gardner | October 06, 2008 at 03:48 AM
Webbot predicts disaster for Oct 7. Correctly predicted 9/11. Grab your guns with one and and all the food you can muster with the other. Here it comes....
Posted by: kingchiba | October 03, 2008 at 09:22 AM
Webbot predicts disaster for Oct 7. Correctly predicted 9/11. Grab your guns with one and and all the food you can muster with the other. Here it comes....
Posted by: kingchiba | October 03, 2008 at 09:21 AM
As Mike wrote, the Northeast Intelligence Network is less than credible. I've just dwindled a few minutes of my early morning time reading a "disclaimer" post they put up, http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/20080928D
Two points of reference. No indication of such a rumor on places like the Counterterrorism Blog. More importantly, no "warning" or alert through Infragard.
Posted by: Stormwarning | October 03, 2008 at 06:24 AM
This sounded worrying until I saw the source: "The Northeast Intelligence Network."
Come on guys, their "Senior Intelligence Analyst" is a washed-up actor. None of them have any genuine experience in intelligence work-- hence the very generic descriptions they give in their bios.
Do you REALLY think that they're scooping the NSA? Please. If they are, we're in much worse shape than any of us imagined. They're a joke.
Posted by: Mike | October 02, 2008 at 02:26 PM
MEM FUCK TERRORISIM THEY ARE LEVAS THEY CAN GET DOWN LIKE MANS THEY ARE BH'S THATS WHY THEY TRY 2 DO TERRORISIM THEY ARE LEVAS
Posted by: PEPE | October 02, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Fuck Terrorism! Life is precious!
Live, Love, Learn
Posted by: Chris | October 01, 2008 at 08:13 PM
Another anniversary for 7 Oct - in fact, the 50th - • 1958 - President of Pakistan Iskander Mirza, with the support of General Ayub Khan and the army, suspends the 1956 constitution, imposes martial law, and cancels the elections scheduled for January 1959.
Posted by: interesting | September 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Of note, 7 October is the 7th anniversary of the "U.S. invasion of Afghanistan" -
The number 7 in Islam
The number of ayat in surat al-Fatiha.
The number of heavens in Islamic tradition.
The number of Earths in Islamic tradition.
The number of circumambulations (Tawaf) that are made around the Kaaba
The number of walks between Al-Safa and Al-Marwah mountains -that is travelling back and forth- seven times during the ritual pilgrimages of Hajj and Umrah.
The number of fires in hell. i.e the 7 fires of hell.
The number of doors to heaven and hell is also seven.
Posted by: interesting | September 30, 2008 at 10:35 AM
I am flying on Oct. 7th from across the pond to the US. You can bet, I wouldn't sit in my seat and die without fighting back. I'd make sure the plane landed in the Ocean before it hit another building. They won't use the plane to kill those not on it. That's a fact and I'm sure all people would participate. If you know you're going to die, might as well die fighting. I hope I don't have to but I would do whatever I can.
Posted by: Emma | September 30, 2008 at 05:37 AM
You know, I looked around the Department of Homeland Security's page, and could not find this at all. Not saying I believe anything they really say either, as they are the real terrorists, but it would be nice to see some primary sources sited instead of a link to some other idiot page.
Nicely said Jeremaid.
Posted by: Patriot9171787 | September 29, 2008 at 03:05 PM
@Jeremiad
S'matter? Run out of tinfoil?
Posted by: Atom&Yves | September 28, 2008 at 10:47 AM
Just a note. An open threat like the one made by "Mr bubble bath" is not a good idea, especially when the blog logs would offer the "authorities" more that adequate information to pursue (and quite likely more).
Posted by: Stormwarning | September 27, 2008 at 06:27 AM
I know where my local mosque is do you? I got 1000 rounds of ammo that's going to do the talking for me. I'm praying for the chance to kick some haji ass on 10/7/08.
Posted by: mr bubble bath | September 26, 2008 at 02:05 PM
Ragheads,
I love it. You've totally bought into the idea that Al C.I.Ada is some sort of outside source that is independent of the real powers that be in the world. You need to wake up and realize that YOU (the military) are being used as puppets in a much larger plan.
Let me guess, you'd totally be down with being in unit that will be shipped to America on October 1st to deal with "outlandish dissidents" on the American homeland.
People higher than the President know what's about to go down, and they're going to let it happen, because they want martial law, and complete control of the people.
Remember military. You fight for the constitution and the American people, not the corrupt American government.
Take a look at the economy. Shit is about to hit the fan, and you're going to have to make a choice. Fight for the government, or fight for the people. They have become two separate entities.
Posted by: Jeremiad | September 26, 2008 at 09:59 AM
sooo, are we gonna take this threat serious or are we and let me clarify we the government are we gonna take this one serious or are we gonna let this one go boom like we did 9-11? oh yeah when is the government gonna back out of this war so we (the milatary) can go in and beat the asshole ragheads? love and kisses jack l harris MS2 USN RET
Posted by: jack l harris | September 26, 2008 at 05:41 AM
Mixed in with the botched Marriott decap strike in Pakistan, Russians hanging out in Venezuela and Iran's fiery little rocketeer's remarks in UN that America's through is interesting.
Posted by: courtneyme109 | September 25, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Northeast Intelligence Network - ok.
Posted by: Stormwarning | September 25, 2008 at 11:02 PM
Katie: Al Qaida doesn't think like we do. Their more radical elements would like to hit us regardless of who's in the Oval Office. But since some of their brethren have been funding Oblahblah's campaign on the internet, it does make some sense that they'd withhold a blow at the US until they see how November 4 goes. If Oblahblah gets elected, then they can hit us, knowing the media will blame Dubya, McCain, Palin, and the rest of conservatism (it's a thoughtless reflex to the media, like dry heaves, and the terrorists know this from watching CNN). And if Oblahblah loses -- better for the USA in the long and short run -- they'll hit us so the media can shriek "see? The world is angry that we didn't elect The Messiah, and this is our righteous punishment!".
Check the CNN contract files closely, and I wouldn't be surprised if you found a signed contract between Bin Laden, Moron.org, George Soros, and CNN.
Posted by: Skunkfeathers | September 25, 2008 at 08:39 PM
Just a passing thought in response to Katie's comment. There are four things terrorists wish to accomplish with each attack.
1-Mass bloodshed
2-Media frenzy
3-Symbolism
4-Economic harm
So, would they not accomplish these four if they were to inflict an attack greater than 9-11 that would, if large enough, postpone the election? (Think of that symbolism)
With our banking in a tailspin, would not economic failure be a possibility?
If it were of such a grand scale would not the media be in a frenzy and would there not be great loss of life?
Beware our enemies! The say what they mean, and mean what they say? One must think like them, not like a westerner!
Wake Up America!
Posted by: Aukmuntr | September 25, 2008 at 02:10 PM
al Qada has been screaming that London is to be the site of the next 9/11, now its NY or Washington. And on 8/7/08?
This would play right into McCain's hands and hurt Obama terribly. I don't see any terror attack upon the US until after the Nov. elections.
Posted by: Katie | September 25, 2008 at 01:41 PM