Obama Funds Offshore Drilling ... in Brazil

...  The U.S. is going to lend billions of dollars to Brazil's state-owned oil company, Petrobras, to finance exploration of the huge offshore discovery in Brazil's Tupi oil field in the Santos Basin near Rio de Janeiro. Brazil's planning minister confirmed that White House National Security Adviser James Jones met this month with Brazilian officials to talk about the loan.

The U.S. Export-Import Bank tells us it has issued a "preliminary commitment" letter to Petrobras in the amount of $2 billion and has discussed with Brazil the possibility of increasing that amount. Ex-Im Bank says it has not decided whether the money will come in the form of a direct loan or loan guarantees. Either way, this corporate foreign aid may strike some readers as odd, given that the U.S. Treasury seems desperate for cash and Petrobras is one of the largest corporations in the Americas.   (WSJ, hat tip Naive & Abroad)

As the author says, ''too bad it's not in U.S. waters".  In reality Obama isn't funding anything.  The money will come out of the pockets of hard-working Americans, Americans who cannot hold up under much more financial stress. 

The truth is we could be drilling in U.S. waters in the Gulf,  -- but not the East coast, West coast, or waters off Alaska.   The Tupi oil fields in Brazil will make Brazil a leading oil exporter.  If America could drill off all her shores, it could be our equivalent of the Tupi oil fields. 

If the Obama administration and everyone else were really serious about getting off foreign  oil, they would do everything in their power to clear the path to American offshore drilling -- now.  

Obama's plan is to increase taxes on oil companies and give a $1,000 tax cut to 'help' Americans, more 'rebates', new investigations of the oil companies...  Obama said drilling off Florida's shores "would not do anything" to lower oil prices.

Even those against offshore drilling will admit that a lot of oil lies untapped under the rocky floors of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans off the U.S. coasts, in areas where Congress has banned drilling since 1982.   They they ask the ridiculous question, "But is it enough to free the U.S. from its dependence on foreign suppliers?"  (Scientific American) 

I don't know if there is enough oil to free us from dependence on foreign suppliers, but shouldn't we find out?  And even if it is not enough to completely make us independent, it will certainly make us less dependent.  Isn't being less dependent the goal?  Should we toss out the idea of becoming less dependent simply because drilling offshore won't make us completely independent?  What kind of thinking is that?

Americans are in favor of drilling for our own oil. While the percentages differ in polls taken in 2007, 2008, 2009 (I did not find a 2010 poll), the majority in all want offshore drilling.

It is very difficult to estimate how much oil is anywhere, some estimates have proven to be wrong, and we need new, current estimates - but that costs money.

...There is a chance that the (Minerals Management Services) MMS has miscalculated the amount of offshore oil, because its estimates are based on 30- to 40-year-old data. For example, MMS spokesperson Nicholas Pardi says a 1987 survey of the Gulf of Mexico indicated there was potentially nine billion barrels of oil there, but when the area was resurveyed nine years later (using newer technologies), the number jumped to potential 45 billion barrels. (Scientific American)   

Sure, some people don't want the oil rigs dotting their skyline, and they worry about a potential spill and environmental problems, but if we leave our dependence on foreign oil up to the environmentalists and the NIMBY groups, we will ALWAYS be dependent. 

Others argue that if we drilled our own oil, it would not be any cheaper than foreign oil.  Is the goal cheaper gas or dependence from oil originating in countries that don't really like us very much?

I would love to have congress hold hearings on why we are financing offshore drilling in Brazil and not here at home.  I would love to see this funding blocked.

Comments

[R.J. Godlewski]

I've been intensely following the offshore oil industry for two decades now (I devour the publication OFFSHORE each month). There are three things that the progressive liberals don't want you knowing:

1. The thought of oil rigs dotting the landscape is a long gone concept. Each single platform can handle dozens of wells;

2. There is more crude released into the environment from natural seeps than from all the manmade accidents combined;

3. The environmental "clean up" for Exxon Valdez did more damage to the environment than the spill itself.

There is absolutely NO excuse for not drilling in our waters. None.

[Debbie]

I wasn't sure about #3, but figured #1 and #2 were true. No reason we should not be drilling, but don't expect anything to change.

[R.J. Godlewski]

Debbie,

#3 actually came from my Oceanography text. I'd give you the title and page # but it's buried away at the moment. ;o)

[Brian]

How about Geo Soros owning the major stake in Petrobas. This is POTUS helping out his sugar daddy with our money and backing and that oil is reputed to be sold to China on a contract already in place. We pay twice again

[Debbie]

Brian: Seems Soros has his fat little liberal fingers in everything these days. Did you see this:

Something Fishy in the Gold Market, IMF, and Treasury?

http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2010/02/something-fishy-in-the-gold-market-imf-and-treasury.html

Soros is involved in all that and we paid more than twice.

[Bob]

It is time for people to outgrow the boogieman in the closet concept of oil production. Fear is a tool for politicians to enslave the masses.

I've seen the oil platform off Santos from Isla São Sebastao. Plans are for the one platform to support dozens of wellheads. The platform does not command attention.

By the way, São Paulo is the big city nearby. Rio de Janiero is pretty far away.

[Brian]

Debbie
I sent that link on the IMF/Gold/T Bills etc to a financial group out west and they were already leaning that way, it's being passed around to the right thinking people who don't read you as I type.
Thanks for being on the edge I appreciate it. Did you see Forbes today ? Soros inside trading conviction in France was upheld.

[Z]

what's the big deal? We've got PLENTY of money !! :-) (oh brother)

[hezekiah@israel]

everything obama does means increasing of taxes. fight with terror, global warming (which is actually scam) and now oil...i am not surprised

[Skunkfeathers]

Barry and Soros...libtard corruption and criminality that should warrant impeachment. But there are no guts in the US Senate, and few patriots among Democrats. The criminality will continue.

[Angel]

his radicalizaton knows no bounds Debbie!

[Debbie]

Bob: Thanks for that, you absolutely correct, but the logic and truth don't seem important these folks.

Brian: Thanks for sharing the information. Finance isn't my strong suit, so I'm hoping someone will take that information and really research it and run with it.

Z: Plenty of money? The US is broke an debt, but I get your sarcasm. We've got to laugh now and then.

Samson Blinded: Yes global warming is nothing but a hoax, but the administration still wants to put tons of money into it anyway. Al Gore need to fry.

Skunkfeathers: You make a good point, we can't expect anything out of congress. Look at Scott Brown who we all thought was going to be a strong Conservative -- his first vote is for the Obama jobs bill.

[MK]

Once again, it's clear to anyone with half a brain cell, with obama it's everyone else first and America last.

[College Term Papers]

Thanks for this info, this issue has been bugging me like crazy for the last couple of days

[auto insurance quotes]

I think you need to cut some slack to Obama. He might have negotiated some sort of a deal, otherwise is he mad to hand much needed funds to Brazillians?

[web hosting]

It’s glad to see good information being convey. Its a very nice written, and i really like these blog. Thanks for the info.