Right Truth

Islam’s Invasion Ideology

Islam’s Invasion Ideology

by  Martel Sobieskey

In the same way that a fake $100 bill is not legitimate currency, Islam is a counterfeit religion and therefore does not qualify for first amendment status. It is extremely incorrect to categorize Islam as a religion when its core literature and bloody track record prove a thousand times over that it is an -- Invasion ideology, a shrewd and cunning predator -- disguising itself as a religion.

Irrefutable evidence proves Islam to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” and a “Trojan horse” hell bent upon destroying all religions and nations worldwide. This irrefutable evidence is a book called the Koran where Allah commands that all Muslims must wage Jihad until the entire world and every single person is either converted to Islam, enslaved, murdered, tortured or abused.

“Fight them until all opposition ends, and all submit to Allah” (Koran: 8:39)

The Koran is a Manual of War

It is an error for anyone to call Islam a religion, but for those who insist, it’s best referred to as a “Religion of War” that has arrived on our shore as an enemy invader for the sole purpose of conquering our nation. This point cannot be overemphasized.

The Koran vows to vanquish all religions and nations worldwide.  Allah himself is the protagonist who relishes the role of a “hit man” vowing to knock off every person who rejects Islam -- sending them to burn in everlasting hell.  For Allah, there is nothing more heinous and loathsome than those infidels (non-believers) who refuse to convert, and there is nothing he will not do to eradicate them.

“I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore, smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off their fingers and toes.” (Koran 8:12)

  “Allah wished to confirm the truth by his words: Wipe the infidels out to the last.” (Koran: 8:7)

Read the Koran for Yourself

Don’t take my word on it.  Read the Koran.  By so doing you will be outraged and ask, “Why in heavens name would any person with integrity and intellectual objectivity call such a blood thirsty and homicidally bigoted “tirade” -- a sacred and holy book?”

Below are two sources for authentic passages from the Koran. The first is entitled   "Islamic Quotes"  taken from prophetofdoom.net .  It provides a few hundred quotes organized into 30 different categories and is very “digestible” giving immediate insight into the malevolence of the Koran and related Islamic texts. The second is an article by Citizen Warrior  encouraging everyone to read the Koran, especially “An Abridged Koran” by CSPI. The advantage of the abridged version is that it eliminates monotonous repetition and provides commentary giving a comprehensive perspective and meaning to the text.

Neutralizing Islam

One does not need a crystal ball to foretell that Islam will turn America into a living hell if left unchecked.  9/11 was America’s initiation into the so called “religious rites” of Islam. Millions of Americans are outraged that the real culprit in this attack has been given a “free pass” to continue its rampage. 

Since 9/11, the religion of peace website has documented 16,124 deadly attacks committed by Islam as mandated by the Koran. These prove that Islam does not deserve the status of a religion and that America has been hoodwinked by so doing. We need to face reality, and implement effective methods if we wish to protect our nation from this religious impostor.

One writer bringing clarity to the situation is Daniel Greenfield. In his article: “Can We Ban Islam? Legal Guidelines for the Criminalization of Islam in the United States” he states in the affirmative that America can legally ban Islam because:

 “Organizations aimed at the overthrow of the United States can be banned and membership in them can even be criminalized.”

They key word here is “overthrow”.  Any group that wishes to overthrow the United States can be banned. It is well past time for open debate and discussion upon this issue in regards to Islam.

To reiterate, Islam does not qualify for religion status in the USA because it an Invasion Ideology which absolutely mandates the conquest of the United States.  Please see my related article entitled "Demoting Islam's Religion Status"  it provides the basic elements for discussion and reflection.  Also, a must see “you tube” video named "3 Things about Islam" provides a concise summary of the challenge we face.  It is imperative for all Americans to learn the truth about Islam or it will eventually destroy us. 

Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare.  He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, and security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam – moderates included.

Calls for John Brennan to Resign

From BlackFive:

I am not a John Brennan fan so it takes near zero effort to get behind a call by a well-respected group of national security professionals calling for the exit of Obama's Counterterror chief. The simple reason is that we cannot have a person in this job who is unable to even articulate the name of the enemy we fight.His latest embarrassment involved a Hamas operative who has been sported about to some of our most sensitive CT facilities as part of a Muslim Outreach program. The folks behind the call for the boot are:

Frank Gaffney, President, Center for Security Policy

Lieutenant General William G. “Jerry” Boykin U.S. Army (Ret.), former

Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence

Admiral James “Ace” Lyons, U.S. Navy (Ret.), former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet

Patrick Poole, Counterterrorism Expert

Clare Lopez, former CIA Officer

“Deputy National Security Advisor John Brennan must resign his post immediately,” said Mr. Gaffney, whose Center for Security Policy sponsored Team B II’s recently released report entitled, Shariah: The Threat to America.  “Mr. Brennan is, at best, willfully blind to the threat posed to the homeland and national security of the United States by those who adhere to shariah.  In the wake of this recent episode at the National Counterterrorism Center, in which the FBI gave a guided tour of one of our most sensitive counter-terrorism facilities to a known Hamas operative, it is clear that the cluelessness fostered by Mr. Brennan is causing an empowering of the wrong sorts of Muslims in America – and endangering the American people.  As the Team B II report documents, this is not an isolated incident.  Rather, it is emblematic of misbegotten and reckless policies that can only be corrected by a change in leadership at the top of the Nation’s homeland security team.”

They also just released a report called "Shariah- The Threat to America" on the worldwide enemy who has engaged us in a very Long War struggle. They have aligned themselves as a modern analogue to the Cold War era Team B which offered alternative looks and suggestions about major national security issues.

Also from BlackFive, there is a renewed call for us to return to our unique Western, or in our case American Culture.

...  what it is really made of.

We must teach our unique Western Culture to our children, or we are doomed to lose it. We must defend our Western Culture by celebrating it, proudly proclaiming it for what it is: the greatest creation of Human Civilization, born in Ancient Greece and Israel, fought for at Marathon and Thermapylae, from whence sprung Democracy, Rule of Law, and Freedom of Thought.

The focus is on our shared Judeo-Christian heritage, and the principles ensconced in the Old and New Testaments, Aristotle's Theory of Happiness, Plato's Republic, the legacy of Cicero, Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence and the Preamble to the Constitution; and that the freedom of the individual citizen versus an oppressive government is the first value adopted and never abandoned.

Freedom of the individual from tyranny is the theme of the Bill of Rights; the first ten amendments to the Constitution, of course. And of those ten amendments, the one which guarantees all of the others is the Second Amendment.

A serious re-evaluation of the principles that define our culture and our lives seems to be underway. The Hope & Change has worked to awake the sleeping giant that is middle America. We all figured our rights were covered and our government didn't get to run our lives. Well every once in a while you gotta kick government in the nads and remind it that we run things not them. Seems to be breaking out all over. Good!

Good is right.  Yesterday the terror threat was raised, new Muimba-type terror attacks in store for the West, we invite the enemy into our home, open the doors of our counterterrorism centers, give them the keys to the kingdom!  The plotters in Europe are apparently still at large.  We're told that "U.S. Military Reigns Supreme in the Sea and Air: But Why Not on the Ground?"  Why not indeed.  Why are we not the strongest military in the world as we once were? 

Our President, Barack Hussein Obama continues to play a shell game.  Businesses in the West, including the U.S., begin catering to Muslims and dappling in Sharia Finance to get the Muslim business.  Best Buy is just the latest.

As Chris Christie, Gov. New Jersey said, it's time for Republicans to put up or shut up:

As usual, the bold and unapologetic Governor of New Jersey hits the nail on the head (via Memeorandum):

“It’s put up or shut up time for the Republican party once we get the opportunity to govern again,” New Jersey Governor Chris Christie told reporters outside a GOP retreat on Wednesday in Washington. “If the voters do give us that opportunity in November on the federal level, it’s time for us to deliver. And it won’t be easy.”  (continue)

John Brennan must go and all like him must go. We should have a litmus test for all politicians when it comes to Islam.

$10,000 Blogging Scholarship Available

This is the 4th Blogging Scholarship, awarding student blogging scholarships since 2006, and it offers student bloggers a chance to be awarded a $10,000 scholarship. 

The application and additional information are located here

The application due date is October 21. The winner will be announced on November 2nd.

Is Your Blog Worthy of a $10,000 Scholarship?

Do you maintain a weblog and attend college? Would you like $10,000 to help pay for books, tuition, or other living costs? If so, read on.

We're giving away $10,000 this year to a college student who blogs. The Blogging Scholarship is awarded annually.

Scholarship Requirements:

• Your blog must contain unique and interesting information about you and/or things you are passionate about. No spam bloggers please!!!
• U.S. citizen or permanent resident;
• Currently attending full-time in post-secondary education in the United States; and
• If you win, you must be willing to allow us to list your name and blog on this page. We want to be able to say we knew you before you became a well educated, rich, and famous blogging legend.  (continue reading)

 

"ANTI-FREEZE" DEMONSTRATORS JOIN FORCES AT THE ISRAELI CONSULATE

BY: FERN SIDMAN

Chants of "Not One Inch" could be heard in midtown Manhattan on Tuesday afternoon, September 28th, as members of Americans For a Safe Israel (AFSI) joined forces with members of the Lubavitch movement representing the World Committee for the Land of Israel in a spirited demonstration of support for the abrogation of the moratorium on settlement building throughout Judea and Samaria that had been in effect for the last 10 months.

Over 200 demonstrators gathered outside the Israeli consulate on East 42nd Street and Second Avenue, holding aloft signs saying, "No Freeze, No Appease, Bibi Stay Strong", "Build !! Don't destroy Jewish homes and synagogues", "The Land of Israel belongs to G-d: Do Not Relinquish it" and "Jerusalem, Hebron, Golan, Judea and Samaria: Ours Forever".

Helen Freedman, executive director of Americans for a Safe Israel told the crowd, "We are here today to celebrate the renewal of building in Israel. We congratulate Prime Minister Netanyahu for resisting the pressure from President Obama and Mahmoud Abbas to extend the construction freeze in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. We must call on Prime Minister Netanyahu to remember that nations rise and fall, but the Jewish people have maintained their right to the entire land of Israel for 4000 years."

Interspersed during the litany of speakers, Lubavitch members led the demonstrators in an emotional recitation of several perakim (chapters) of Tehillim; while beseeching Hashem's mercy and protection for the Jewish people and the land of Israel. The male and female demonstrators were separated by a mechitza and young men from Lubavitch carried their sets of the "Arba Minim", exhorting Jewish passersby to recite the brocha "al netilas lulav" while holding them.

Among the speakers were Rabbi Aaron Raskin of Congregation B'nai Avraham in Brooklyn Heights, Rabbi Weinberg from Kansas City, Dr. Michoel Friend from 770 Chabad - co-organizer of demonstration, Janet Lehr (who blogs Israel Lives), Evelyn Haies, president of Rachel's Children Reclamation Foundation, Ezra Zareh, an attorney from Merrick, NY and Robin Ticker representing Jewish women of Lubavitch.

"We are here today to publicize and advocate for the adoption of the Lubavitcher Rebbe's platform of staunch opposition to the relinquishing of any part of Eretz Yisroel", said Michoel Friend of the World Committee for the Land of Israel. "This position is predicated on halacha and giving away parts of Israel leads to the tragic loss of life and thus is halachically prohibited", he continued. "What has lead our Jewish leaders to even contemplate the notion of doing this? It is the galus mentality that makes them think that they can curry favor with the non-Jewish world by giving away the land that G-d promised to His people for eternity. We must take our leaders and our rabbis to task for having neglected to stand up and cite halacha in support of Israel", he intoned.

"A safe Israel means a safe America", said Ezra Zareh, a New York attorney. "There is no Palestine and there never was one. The land of Israel was bequeathed to the Jewish nation by the G-d of Israel and we need only turn to our holy Torah for proof of that. Pharoah is gone, Haman is gone, the Romans and the Greeks are gone, Hitler is gone and Israel will exist for eternity. Let's make no mistake about it. All of the territories in Israel belong to the Jewish people and we must always remember that", he said.

"Our mother Rochel is the role model for the entire world", declared Evelyn Haies of the Rachel's Children Reclamation Foundation. "Rochel Imenu lifted her voice for her people and cried bitter tears for the precious land of Israel and in her merit we were returned to our land. We have no right to hand it over to our sworn enemies who seek our destruction. We have no right to impose any freeze on the building of Jewish communities anywhere in Israel and especially in Judea and Samaria. We are here to stay and we too must raise our voices and shed tears for our land and for our people, for Hashem listens to our prayers and sees our broken hearts and because of that we will merit to be redeemed", she said.

"We bring peace and prosperity to all of mankind by scrupulously observing all of G-d's commandments" said Robin Ticker. "That is the way we bring kedusha to the land of Israel and it was through the righteous deeds of Jewish women that we have been saved throughout the millenium. It is G-d who decides who inherits that land of Israel and it is through our nation that we will be a beacon of light to the entire world."

Helen Freedman of AFSI concluded by saying, "During the holiday of Sukkot, when we live and eat in fragile booths to commemorate the exodus from Egypt and the embrace of freedom in the promised land, let us speak with one strong voice in support of our beloved inheritance. It's time for us to say -- "here I am" -- when asked by G-d, "where are you?"

Other organizations participating in the demonstration were the Jewish Political Education Foundation, the Crown Heights Committee for Shlaymus HaAretz, Rabbonim of Crown Heights, the Zionist Organization of America and Chabad of Flatbush.

59% Credit Card Interest?

R.J. Godlewski used his phone to snap an image (see below) of an "Initial Disclosure and Important Information" sheet for a First Premier Bank credit card "pre-approval" that a person with less than stellar credit received. You will notice on the top line that the APR for purchases is 59.9%.  [OUCH!]

 

Also, towards the bottom is a processing fee of $45 and an annual fee of $75. 

 

I don't know about you, but I'd call that highway robbery. SIXTY PERCENT INTEREST????

 

Oh yeah, Obama doin' good for the country...

Here are the Watcher of Weasels article submissions for this week, enjoy:

Council Submissions

• The Colossus of Rhodey – “Conservative ‘Orthodoxy’ Equals … Communism?”
• Rhymes With Right – George Blanda — The Grand Old Man Passes
• The Razor – Obamacare – The Worst of All Worlds
• The Glittering Eye – Why Aren’t the Lowest 99% of Income Earners Marching in the Streets?
• VA Right – Cars in Ditches and Delaware Witches
• GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnD – Stuxnet!
• Right Truth – Muslim Appeasement By The West – Ignorance or Intent?
• Bookworm Room – The Bay Area Patriots’ GroupaPalooza — from the Progressive perspective
• Snapped Shot – Hippy Technology: The Silent Killer
• Joshuapundit - Israeli-Palestinian Talks Break Down – And The Back Story They’re Not Telling You

Non-Council Submissions

• Discriminations – Impeach Eric Holder! submitted by The Colossus of Rhodey
• American Power – It’s Come to This: Progressives Reduced to Racist Slurs Against American Power submitted by Rhymes With Right
• Canada Free Press – Daniel Greenfield – The 5 Biggest Lies about Liberalism submitted by The Razor
• Pajamas Media – American Hero: Coates Negates a Year of Justice Department Spin on New Black Panther Case submitted by The Glittering Eye
• The Other McCain – MD-5 UPDATE: Charles Lollar Endorsed by Ace of Spades and Dude Named ‘Mitt’ submitted by VA Right
• 6th Generation Warfare – Oppose Arms Control for Drones submitted by GrEaT sAtAn”S gIrLfRiEnD
• Yid With Lid – Bob Beckel Threatens Blogger Pamela Geller During FBN Appearance submitted by Right Truth
• Commentary Contentions – The Wrongdoing, the Cover-Up, and Executive Privilege submitted by Bookworm Room
• The Jawa Report – Iran Jails Blogger submitted by Snapped Shot
• HNN/Judith Apter Klinghoffer – Is Obama Disappointed That Abbas Has Not Ended Incitement? submitted by JoshuaPundit
• Q & O Online Magazine – A Homecoming submitted by The Watcher

  

Muslim Appeasement By The West - Ignorance or Intent?

We are at war. … Let me mince no words in saying that from Fort Hood to Bali, from Times Square to London, from Madrid to Mumbai, from 9/11 to Gaza, the murderers, the barbarians are radical Islamists.

To camouflage their identity is sedition.  To excuse their deeds is contemptible.  To mask their intentions is unconscionable.  --Rabbi S. Lewis

The West does camouflage, excuse, and mask the intentions of our mutual enemy and have not been charged with sedition, have avoided being seen as contemptible by the masses and have yet to be held accountable for their underlying intentions.  Make no mistake, I believe the fault here is shared between inexcusable ignorance and so far partially unrevealed intentions.

The quote above is from a 4,000 word sermon which was delivered by Rabbi S. Lewis in Atlanta.   Dr. Phyllis Chesler, who shares 1,400 words from the sermon, says the "2010 Rosh Hashana sermon was very long — but to the point. It is titled, in Yiddish, “Ehr Kumt” (He is Coming), or as I would say, a la Yeats, “the bloody beast is back.”   I would like to share a bit more of the sermon and then share some commentary and facts on the same subject from a few other great minds. 

Years ago when I first started working, I was told that I was not required to know everything, but I should be able to find out anything.  Those of us in the United States of America would be well served to heed the advice and information shared in the following quotes, because as free American citizens we are not required to know everything, but there is no excuse for not being able to find out anything we need to know about our enemy and the challenges facing this nation's future in order to preserve our freedoms.

We are at war.  We are at war with an enemy as savage, as voracious, as heartless as the Nazis but one wouldn’t know it from our behavior. During WWII we didn’t refer to storm troopers as freedom fighters.  We didn’t call the Gestapo, militants.   We didn’t see the attacks on our Merchant Marine as acts by rogue sailors.  We did not justify the Nazis rise to power as our fault.  We did not grovel before the Nazis, thumping our hearts and confessing to abusing and mistreating and humiliating the German people.  We did not apologize for Dresden, nor for The Battle of the Bulge, nor for El Alamein, nor for D-Day.

Evil – ultimate, irreconcilable, evil threatened us and Roosevelt and Churchill had moral clarity and an exquisite understanding of what was at stake.

Not all Germans were Nazis – most were decent, most were revolted by the Third Reich, most were good citizens hoisting a beer, earning a living and tucking in their children at night.  But, too many looked away, too many cried out in lame defense – “I didn’t know.”  Too many were silent.  Guilt absolutely falls upon those who committed the atrocities, but responsibility and guilt falls upon those who did nothing as well.

In WWII we won because we got it.  We understood who the enemy was and we knew that the end had to be unconditional and absolute.  We did not stumble around worrying about offending the Nazis.  We did not measure every word so as not to upset our foe.  We built planes and tanks and battleships and went to war to win … to rid the world of malevolence. [snip]

Democracies don’t always win.

Tyrannies don’t always lose.

My friends — the world is on fire and we must awake from our slumber.  EHR KUMT.

Indeed democracies don't always win and here in the United States democracy is slowly being eroded.  The freedoms this nation was founded upon are under attack.   The ever prescient Mark Steyn discusses several free speech issues here in North America.  After a visit to Guantanamo and seeing how Korans were handled, or actually not handled, by our military --not touched by infidel hands, gloves used, Korans placed in sterile medical masks and hung so as not to touch the ground or anything else-- Steyn said, "What does that degree of prostration before their prejudices tell them about us? It’s a problem that Muslims think we’re unclean. It’s a far worse problem that we go along with it."  Steyn continues:

Take this no-name pastor from an obscure church who was threatening to burn the Koran. He didn’t burn any buildings or women and children. He didn’t even burn a book. He hadn’t actually laid a finger on a Koran, and yet the mere suggestion that he might do so prompted the President of the United States to denounce him, and the Secretary of State, and the commander of US forces in Afghanistan, various G7 leaders, and golly, even Angelina Jolie. President Obama has never said a word about honor killings of Muslim women. Secretary Clinton has never said a word about female genital mutilation. General Petraeus has never said a word about the rampant buggery of pre-pubescent boys by Pushtun men in Kandahar. But let an obscure man in Florida so much as raise the possibility that he might disrespect a book – an inanimate object – and the most powerful figures in the western world feel they have to weigh in.

Aside from all that, this obscure church’s website has been shut down, its insurance policy has been canceled, its mortgage has been called in by its bankers. Why? As Diana West wrote, why was it necessary or even seemly to make this pastor a non-person? Another one of Obama's famous "teaching moments"? In this case teaching us that Islamic law now applies to all? Only a couple of weeks ago, the President, at his most condescendingly ineffectual, presumed to lecture his moronic subjects about the First Amendment rights of Imam Rauf. Where's the condescending lecture on Pastor Jones' First Amendment rights?

When someone destroys a bible, US government officials don’t line up to attack him. President Obama bowed lower than a fawning maitre d’ before the King of Saudi Arabia, a man whose regime destroys bibles as a matter of state policy, and a man whose depraved religious police forces schoolgirls fleeing from a burning building back into the flames to die because they’d committed the sin of trying to escape without wearing their head scarves. If you show a representation of Mohammed, European commissioners and foreign ministers line up to denounce you. If you show a representation of Jesus Christ immersed in your own urine, you get a government grant for producing a widely admired work of art. Likewise, if you write a play about Jesus having gay sex with Judas Iscariot.

So just to clarify the ground rules, if you insult Christ, the media report the issue as freedom of expression: A healthy society has to have bold, brave, transgressive artists willing to question and challenge our assumptions, etc. But, if it’s Mohammed, the issue is no longer freedom of expression but the need for "respect" and "sensitivity" toward Islam, and all those bold brave transgressive artists don’t have a thing to say about it.

Steyn goes on to discuss the many Right leaning websites and blogs that have been shut down, the selective way Google allows sites to be ranked, the many ways Islam is given special rights, and also the Everybody Draw Mohammed Day author Molly Norris:

"There is no more Molly"? That's all the gutless pussies of The Seattle Weekly can say? As James Taranto notes in The Wall Street Journal, even much sought-after Ramadan-banquet constitutional scholar Barack Obama is remarkably silent:

Now Molly Norris, an American citizen, is forced into hiding because she exercised her right to free speech. Will President Obama say a word on her behalf? Does he believe in the First Amendment for anyone other than Muslims?

Who knows? Given his highly selective enthusiasms, you can hardly blame a third of Americans for figuring their president must be Muslim. In a way, that's the least pathetic explanation: The alternative is that he's just a craven squish. Which is odd considering he is, supposedly, the most powerful man in the world.[snip]

It is a basic rule of life that if you reward bad behavior, you get more of it. Every time Muslims either commit violence or threaten it, we reward them by capitulating. Indeed, President Obama, Justice Breyer, General Petraeus, and all the rest are now telling Islam, you don’t have to kill anyone, you don’t even have to threaten to kill anyone. We’ll be your enforcers. We’ll demand that the most footling and insignificant of our own citizens submit to the universal jurisdiction of Islam. (more)

Submit to the universal jurisdiction of Islam, that's where we are headed?  Sounds like our freedoms are not just at risk, but some are actually gone.  Rabbi Lewis and Mark Steyn should get together, they would truly have a lot to talk about with  the world is on fire and we must awake from our slumber.

With so many fine people like the Rabbi, Steyn Victor David Hansen and many others, ignorance of the situation is no excuse.  Which brings us to the intent.

There are reasons why the Muslims act as they do, why their loyalties are to their own and against all others.  There is no reason for Western democracies to submit to the Koran or Islamic ways, none. 

In The Specter of Muslim Disloyalty in America, Raymond Ibrahim says:

Islamist enmity for infidels, regularly manifested in the jihad, is by now moderately well known. Lesser known, however, but of equal concern, is the mandate for Muslims to be loyal to fellow Muslims and Islam — a loyalty that all too often translates into disloyalty to all things non-Muslim, including the American people and their government.

This dichotomy of loyalty to Muslims and enmity for infidels — which, incidentally, corresponds well with Islamic law's division of the world into the abode of war (deserving of enmity) and the abode of Islam (deserving of loyalty) — is founded on a Muslim doctrine called wala' wa bara' (best translated as "loyalty and enmity"). I first encountered this doctrine while translating various Arabic documents for The Al Qaeda Reader. In fact, the longest and arguably most revealing document I included in that volume is titled "Loyalty and Enmity" (pgs.63-115), compiled by Aymen Zawahiri, al Qaeda's number two.

I say "compiled" because most of the words are direct quotes from the Koran, the Muslim prophet Muhammad, and Islam's jurists (i.e., this doctrine is not an "al-Qaeda" phenomenon but rather permeates the Islamicate worldview). [snip]

Mr. Ibrahim notes  Nasser Abdo, an infantryman assigned to the 101st Airborne Division, who refuses to deploy to Afghanistan;   major Nidal Hasan of the infamous Fort Hood killing spree;  sergeant Hasan Akbar, who was convicted of murder for killing two American soldiers and wounding fourteen in a grenade attack in Kuwait who wrote in his diary: "I may not have killed any Muslims, but being in the army is the same thing. I may have to make a choice very soon on who to kill."

The next question must be, does this interpretation of the Koran and Islam apply only to those in the official military?  Of course not.

As for all other instances that require Muslims to indicate their loyalty, the doctrine of taqiyya, which revolves around deceiving non-Muslims, offers relief, and is in fact essential for Muslim minorities living in America who want to uphold the doctrine of loyalty and enmity.  [snip]

Moreover, it is one thing if the average American Muslim harbors loyalty to fellow Muslims, including terrorists such as al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah. It is quite another if that Muslim happens to be in a position of authority in the United States. This observation naturally leads to a president who up to 24% of Americans and many Muslims believe is a clandestine Muslim and who at least appears to have been raised a Muslim: Barrack Hussein Obama.

While there is no proof that he is a Muslim — indeed, no less an authority than Jeremiah Wright, the fellow who used to bellow "God damn America!" recently vouched for Obama's Christianity — the point here is simple: if an American president was a secret Muslim, and if he was lying about it, and even if he was secretly working to subvert the US to Islam's advantage — not only would such an approach comport with Islam's doctrines on loyalty and deception, but it would have ample precedents, stretching back to the dawn of Islam. Such as when Muhammad commanded one Na'im bin Mas'ud, a convert from an adversarial tribe that refused to submit to Islam, to conceal his new Muslim identity, go back to his tribe — which he cajoled with a perfidious "You are my stock and my family, the dearest of men to me" — only to betray them to Islam.

Appeasement to Islam intentional?  I believe yes.  Let us not just concentrate our sights on Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama, but also on the many Muslim, pro-Palestinian, pro-Hamas advisors, czars, etc. Obama surrounds himself with.  Let us also concentrate on and beware of the new Muslim college and numerous Turkey sponsored Fethullah Gulen charter schools around the United States. 

Let us also watch the ever increasing Left-leaning and appeasing media, civil liberties groups who care not for the civil liberties of all but mainly for the liberties on Islam.  Let us continue to watch the lopsided acceptance of Jew and Christian bashing.  Keep in mind that the United Nations is dominated by Israel and American (and Western in general) hating Muslims.

Let us be fully aware of the ever increasing hatred of Jews and Israel, Christians and the West by Muslims and by Left/Progressives.   Dr. Phyllis Chesler  has been writing about "a possible second Holocaust against the Jewish state for a long time now" and notes that "many of the distinguished academic presenters at Yale University’s superb conference on global anti-Semitism shared at least a part of this vision."  Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad makes no secret he wants Israel wiped off the face of the earth.  This week his Iranian First Vice-President Mohammad Reza Rahimi reiterated that the Zionist regime is the agent and representative of the Satan on the Earth. 

Could anyone think that the direction the world is headed is simply to be blamed on ignorance alone?  No.  Intent.  Cold, hard, well-planned intent.  You don't have to know everything, but there is no excuse for not knowing this.  With our own president at the head of the line leading this country in the wrong direction, it is imperative that we see the truth, that we follow the brave souls like Mark Steyn, Geert Wilders, the Rabbi Lewis, and so many more.  Be sure to see El Taqiyya Presidente, by R.J. Godlewski.

We can stop the ignorance.  We can reveal the intent,  We can turn things around. 

Sunset Photo

Enjoy!

 

I took these picture with hubby's camera Saturday night.  I was so far away when I took it I didn't even see the power lines, which are obvious in the image.  It was a beautiful sky.

El Taqiyya Presidente

El Taqiyya Presidente

By R.J. Godlewski

© September 27, 2010, All Rights Reserved

When a person falls into love, their feeling of passion and euphoria exists from the production of dopamine, a neurotransmitter that boosts the individual’s sensation of exhilaration for a period not normally exceeding twenty-four months in duration. After this euphoria wears thin, oxytocin kicks in and the person acquiesces to a period of warmth and “connection” with their object of affection. The problem exists, whenever we find ourselves in love that we mature through a gullibility phase during which we tend to overlook the failures and frailties of our obsession. For about two full years, we still see a “queen” or “king” of the prom before reality reminds us that we have often fallen in love with the court jester instead.

Dopamine is obviously the culprit that singles out a soul from the six plus billion individuals who inhabit our planet and convinces us that we cannot live without them until oxytocin settles the debate for the rest of our lives. In marriage, this is not necessarily a bad experience. God knows well beforehand, who we need within our lives and given a “unto death do us part” mandate, our chosen ‘jester’ and we can lead rather remarkable lives.  Where devastation appears, is when a transitory figure enters our shuhari – or ‘circle’ – and affects our sensibilities for gain. Although we must love our spouse to survive, this being “in love” seriously disrupts our ability to think logically and rationally. After all, very few of us would intentionally fall in love with an alcoholic, a spendthrift, or a scoundrel.

The 2010 midterm elections appear just around the corner and after nearly two years of the Obama presidency, the nation’s dopamine intoxication is finally wearing off. Voters in droves are beginning to see through the euphoric clouds that denied them an opportunity to observe President Barack Hussein Obama for what the man really is. Some, perhaps a stubborn third of the country, have not quite yet reached the oxytocin stage and are steadfastly making excuses and accusations to shore the image of their “beloved” One. Euphoria makes them project more unto the man than they receive from his actions alone.

For example, many supporters of President Obama complain bitterly whenever someone, such as me, prefers to include his middle name “Hussein” as part of his description. Had he been born Alfalfa Buckwheat Darla, then we would not be in much of a position to criticize the man. The truth is, however, President Barack Hussein Obama personally chose his name – it was not the moniker that he was born with. There was no need for him to alter his name after college unless he so chose to adapt to a new name for personal and/or professional reasons. Similarly, we cannot complain about the man’s race. No one intentionally chooses to be born black, white, or Asian anymore than a person intentionally chooses to be born male or female. We can, however, choose to challenge the man’s actions after he became an adult. At least for those of us not afflicted with rampant Dopamine.

Critically speaking, President Obama is decidedly anti-American in his actions and policies for his activities suggest a total disregard for the U.S. Constitution, American greatness, and the free market system. The “Afflicted”, to the contrary, still maintain, as an example, that the President is actually supportive of the free market capitalist system because, among other things, his administration includes former employees of the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, etc. Unfortunately, membership within even a capitalistic bureaucracy does not portend to be either “free market” or “capitalist” oriented. Not any more than my simply being a member of the Roman Catholic Church guarantees my sainthood.

People define themselves more by their actions than their stated beliefs. My weekly attendance at Mass, the witness of my profession of faith, and, most importantly, my insisting that Church doctrine – not my perception of it – is what matters most, for instance, can verify my being the aforementioned Roman Catholic. Am I a good Roman Catholic? Hardly. Is the Catholic faith the greatest? Absolutely.  As tainted as I personally am, I can still identify the parish where I was baptized, the parish where I was confirmed, and the parish where I currently attend. Furthermore, during my frequent travels, I have attended Mass in Buffalo, Charlotte, Napa, San Antonio, Los Angeles, Monticello, Elk City and other cities too numerous to list here.

Again, as an American, I leave much to be desired. However, my actions speak louder than any mere words. I served honorably in both the United States Navy and Navy Reserve despite that I considered myself a mediocre sailor at best.  I have voted within every election that I had an opportunity to take part in despite the fact that I rarely agreed fully with any particular candidate. When I contribute to the poor and disadvantaged, I rarely do so through methods that can be verified for of what value is charity if some earthly benefit can be derived from the practice? Am I therefore a good American? Hardly. Is the United States of America the greatest? Absolutely. As tainted as I personally am, I can still identify the hospital where I was born (with my original birth certificate), identify every state in which I have possessed a driver’s license or bank account, show anyone my previous and existing passport, identify every hospital where I spent time, and few readers can deny my aspiring patriotism.

Sadly, for a man not two years my senior in age, President Obama cannot identify any of these things. Why? Why cannot the most scrutinized man on the planet identify with some degree of certainty those things that I, a man nearly of his own age, can produce within minutes? There are two reasons: he either cannot or will not. Either way bodes ill for the nation as a whole. Either President Obama cannot produce whom he is, which makes his habitual alteration of identity extremely suspicious, or he will not share expected aspects of his life with us, which makes his service to the nation deeply suspicious. Whether or not I, or any other citizen, deeply hate his guts make very little difference to the facts. My prejudice, if it did indeed exist, could not argue against the truth.

Current polls suggest that about one-third of the United States believes President Obama to be a Muslim. This is an extraordinary revelation, but one that could be dispatched with a few offerings from the president. Unfortunately, he has failed to adequately address these concerns. Or has he? My Roman Catholicism is simple to verify. The R.J. Godlewski baptized in northern Michigan forty-seven years ago is the same R.J. Godlewski who served as a confirmation sponsor to a shipmate in the Navy (who was gay, incidentally, so my Catholicism does not impede upon my personal prejudices and vice versa) , and the same R.J. Godlewski who partook of various Masses from California to Massachusetts.  The Vatican specifically lays out my adherence and my penance keeps me aligned with the tenets of the Church and not vice versa.

What of our illustrious president? Do his preferences and actions suggest Christianity or Islam? I am hard-pressed to find anything that suggests the former. Certainly, his twenty years in attendance at the church of Reverend Wright cannot be construed as Christianity for the pastor himself had dismissed any thought of discipleship (Christianity does not support bigotry, racism, or “social justice”, etc.). To consider myself a Roman Catholic, I have had to wade through a litany of sacraments designed to publicly acknowledge my faith. It has not been easy, but if I possessed all the answers, people would be flocking to worship me instead of me seeking to worship God. President Obama took nearly two years to enter a Christian Church whereas my faith requires that I attend a specific church every week regardless of my profession or location. If there is a Catholic church nearby, I am there.

If, on the other hand, President Obama were indeed a Muslim, what then would be his “public acknowledgment”?  Would he be required to enter a mosque every week or could he possibly just believe that “There is only one God and Muhammad is his prophet”? He would not have to make such a proclamation if he were a Shiite Muslim for the doctrine of al-Taqiyya grants him a divine right to lie and deceive in order to hide his Islamic faith. That is, if President Obama were a Shiite, we would never know until it was too late. Yet, there remain his actions.

Although I am, again, an aspiring Roman Catholic, I do not discount the existence of the State of Israel. After all, Jesus, Mary, Joseph, the twelve Apostles, Saint Paul, etc.  were all raised Jewish. At worst, I consider them to be distant cousins of my family, which is probably why I had more friends in school who were Jewish than Christian and I cannot think of even one that was Catholic. Why, therefore, would I hate Jews? For the record, I do not hate Muslims just that I possess more in common with people of the Jewish faith. Would any self-respecting Muslim find my friendship more compatible than that from another orthodox Muslim? I probably would not trust them if they did.

President Obama, however, is decidedly antagonistic towards the State of Israel, members of the Jewish faith, and just about any Judeo-Christian value. His actions seem to parrot that of Shi’a Iran, whose leaders openly call for the destruction of Israel and the Jews. He is also, in my opinion, very much a socialist if not a Socialist. Being either an aspirant or a card-carrying member is at odds with Christianity for God placed responsibility for our lives within our hands, not the collective. If we cannot witness his preferences for Christianity, we can certainly witness Barack Obama’s flirtation with Islamic cultures.

Whether Kenya, Pakistan, or Indonesia, Barack Obama has left a trail of travels throughout Muslim lands. His father was a Muslim, which according to the faith makes the son one as well. Furthermore, Islam requires an individual to change their name and abandon all ties with things Christian. Here again, we have Barry become Barack and pro-Christian American ideals marketed as the bearer of evil to the world. America may not be perfect, but I dare anyone in the world to prove a better nation in existence. President Obama has yet to make this boast signifying his unbelief in American exceptionalism.

Could al-Taqiyya enable an American president to consciously destroy his nation while bending over backwards to appease Islam? Absolutely. Is it being done at the present? I’ll let you be the judge. You must ask yourself the following questions:

*  Are President Obama’s policies consistent with what you feel are traditional Judeo-Christian values?

* Are President Obama’s policies consistent with his actions or do you feel that a bit of deception is being orchestrated upon the country?

*  Who are America’s allies, Israel, which has shared our values for sixty years or Islamic nations who share little of our values and are diametrically opposed to them?

* Is President Obama open and sympathetic to your values?

* Are President Obama’s policies benefitting you as a person of moral standards?

Much homework remains before you can decide whether President Obama is merely a Christian lacking or Muslim backing. You must decide for yourself, I will not make up your mind for you. Progressives try to convince others to do their deed. I am smart enough to know that you are smart enough to think for yourself. Better, for you to think that I am stark raving mad than to have someone shoot you up with dopamine.

*************

R.J. Godlewski (GOD LESS KEY) is an independent counterterrorism consultant, the director of the private International Nuclear Emergency Response Team [INERT], and the author of several novels, commentaries, and professional articles. He is also the author and architect of the Web-based Independent Counterterrorist training program. He is currently working on his B.A. in Intelligence Studies at American Military University with a concentration in Middle East terrorism. He currently holds an undergraduate certificate in Explosive Ordnance Disposal and is a full member of the National Military Intelligence Association, the Golden Key International Honour Society, and is a veteran of both the United States Navy and Navy Reserve. He can be reached at rjgodlewsk(at)rjgodlewski.com.

Ahmadinejad and his meeting with the New Black Panther Party

Why would Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad be doing meeting with the New Black Panther Party in the U.S.?  The meeting  with Louis Farrakhan took place in a banquet room at the Warwick Hotel on West 54th Street, according to the New York Post.  Other interesting events surrounding Ahmadinejad include a woman at the bar in the Hilton Manhattan East, on 42nd Street, shouting to Ahmadinejad and company,  "You stoned my sister! You're murderers!"   Brave woman.

Ahmadinejad usually wears his tan casual jacket, not a suit, but this time, according to the NYP,   "DID HE LOSE HIS LUGGAGE? As Mahmoud Ahmadinejad carried out his UN smarm offensive, he wore the same suit and shirt for six days."  Well, either he wore the same clothes for six days or he had six identical shirts and suits.

Ahmadinejad, who wore the same tacky suit and shirt all week, took every precaution. He never set foot in the lobby. Bulletproof glass was installed over room windows. When he left for meetings at the Iranian Mission, on Third Avenue, or the United Nations, he departed by an employee entrance, the path covered in a white tent -- a veritable tunnel to his vehicle. His head was covered with a white cloth. No one saw him on the street.

The entourage dined in but not on room service. Meals -- mostly lamb, shish kebabs, spiced ground meat and basmati rice -- were prepared by a Persian restaurant and carried in by Secret Service agents.

A source said the spicy grub made "the whole hotel stink like hell."

Maybe that smell wasn't just the spicy grub, but Ahmadinejad's body odor???

  

Hermit Monks, Monastery, Wyoming, Ground Zero Mosque....

Roman Catholic hermit monks of the Most Blessed Virgin Mary of Mt. Carmel want to build a 144,000-square-foot French Gothic-style monastery featuring a church that seats 150, with one spire rising 150 feet, and coffee roasting barn near Meeteetse, Wyoming, a town with a population of about 350.  Some ranchers are objecting to the monastery.  Keep in mind these are hermit monks, they do not interact with the public.  

According to the AP report, Dave Grabbert, owner of the 2,500 acre ranch the monks want to build on, said  "What's puzzling to me is if people complain about these guys as neighbors, what kind of neighbors would they want."  Apparently it's not the fact that they are monks people are concerned about.  The article mentions traffic, wildlife, water — and questioning whether the massive stone structure fits with the rural landscape ... and the religious order wouldn't be paying property taxes.

I think this story is very interesting when compared with the situation in New York City and the Ground Zero mosque, don't you?  Is Barack Obama and all the other dhimmis standing up and saying the monks have the right to build their monastery on this site?  Where's the media, where's the demonstrators, where are the cries of racism at those who are against the monastery?  Why isn't New York City complaining that they will be deprived of taxes from the Cordoba House?  The questions could go on and on.

They belong to an order rooted in the 16th century that requires they sustain themselves through mostly manual labor. They dress in handmade full length robes, sleep in small individual housing units called hermitages with no radio, no TV, no Internet. They raise and grow most of their own food, funding their operation by making and producing their own brand of coffee called Mystic Monk. They market mugs, bag clips, T-shirts, travel mugs and a CD of their Gregorian chants over the Internet and with mail-order catalogs.  [In this Aug. 26, 2010 photo, rancher Dave Grabbert stands on the 2,500-acre ranch in... (AP Photo/Bob Moen)]  [snip]

 ...  The area has few roads, a few widely dispersed ranch homes, a few scattered oil and gas wells. The ranch is about 14 miles from the nearest public road, and the nearest town, 20 miles away, is Meeteetse, population about 350, that is most famous for the arrest of outlaw Butch Cassidy in 1894.  (AP, hat tip R.J. Godlewski)

I have no opinion of whether this monastery should or should not be built on this spot, that's up to the people in the area.  This situation is nothing like the situation with the Ground Zero mosque because the monks have no desire to proselytize, no desire to bring harm to people, no desire to force some other form of government or religion on their neighbors or citizens of this country.  Hermit monks did not attack the United States, they did not kill innocent Americans, and they have no questionable intentions.  All unlike the Imam Rauf and those connected to Ground Zero mosque. 

This artist's rendering provided by the New Mount Carmel Foundation, Inc., shows a proposed new monastery in Northern Wyoming. A few neighboring ranchers have objected to the plan, citing concerns about traffic, water and wildlife and whether the monastery would fit in with the rural landscape. (AP Photo/New Mount Carmel Foundation, Inc.)