... Don't move to Western civilized nations! Muslims move to Western nations and bring their extended families. Unlike other immigrants who came here looking to be a part of American culture and a better life for their families, many Muslim immigrants come here planning to maintain their native culture and change America. "Americans, like Europeans, are now experiencing a new kind of immigrant, one for whom tribal, cultural, or ethnic loyalty trumps his allegiance to American law and to western concepts of individual human rights." says Dr. Phyllis Chesler. Unfortunately, many in the U.S., including the media, have failed to understand this.
Young girls and wives have been shot in the back seat of the father's taxi; beheaded; run over by a two-ton jeep, not once, but twice; ... Why? Because they wanted to live as Americans. Muslim on Muslim violence. The killers, usually their father, brother, husband, admit to the murder but do not see it as a crime, at least not a crime in Islam, but an honor that must be upheld. In most cases, the female family members are too afraid to stand up to the men or they are true believers and think the men have done the right thing by killing their daughters.
What could these women do to deserve such treatment? Dress in Western clothing, date non-Muslim boys/men, want an education and job, things we take for granted, things that are part of the Western culture. America, like any other nation, has the right to it's own culture and the right to expect those who want to live here to embrace that culture.
If Muslims, or any other group, do not embrace American culture, then they need to stay in their home country, or return there immediately. Immigration policy for Muslims and those considered refugees. Just because someone lives in trying times in their country does not mean the United States must import them under refugee status. Christians around the world are under assault by Muslims, let's concentrate on these first because we know that in Christianity honor killing does not exist.
As Dr. Chesler says:
...as I have documented in two studies in Middle East Quarterly, western-style domestic violence is not the same as an honor killing. If we do not quickly understand what the differences are, we will not understand how to protect or shelter those immigrants and asylum seekers who wish to live like Americans in America; nor will we be able to prosecute their murderers effectively. The blood of girls and women like Noor Almaleki, Aasiya Zubair Hassan, and Sarah and Amina Said, will be on American hands.
Noor Almaleki:
Aasiya Zubair Hassan:
While America imports Muslims, we also import terror and a way of life, a culture, that is anti-American. Immigrants must assimilate. Below the fold, please read the article "Fjordman: Why Islam Must Be Expelled From The West" from December 10, 2010. While expelling all Muslims from the West is certainly not an option. We know there are indeed Muslims to love Western countries, who have assimilated and who are good citizens. However, his article is an interesting read, first see these items:
U.N.: Sweden Deports 26 Iraqi Asylum-seekers
Poor Economy Hampering Iraq Refugee Return: UNHCR
U.N. Calls for 'Beginning of End' for Iraqi Refugees' Struggle
Fjordman: Why Islam Must Be Expelled From The West
Winds of Jihad 19 December 2010
On the 11th of December 2010, the first-ever suicide bombing in Scandinavia occurred when Taimour Abdulwahab, an Iraqi-born Muslim and Swedish citizen with a wife and children in Luton, Britain, was carrying explosives and mistakenly set off an explosion near a busy Christmas shopping street in Stockholm just before he could murder dozens of people.
Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, who is a passionate promoter of having Turkey as a full member of the European Union and Islam as an established part of European culture, stated that "We were extremely lucky ... I mean minutes and just a couple of hundred metres from where it would have been very catastrophic." Sweden's intelligence agency and a news agency received an email with audio files in which a man called on "all hidden mujahedeen [Islamic holy warriors] in Europe, and especially in Sweden, it is now the time to fight back." He criticized Sweden for its military presence in Afghanistan and its acceptance of the artist Lars Vilks, who had made some cartoons mocking Muhammad. The message warned that "now your children, daughters and sisters die like our brothers' and sisters' children die."
We've been told for years that suicide bombers who blow themselves up in civilian areas in Israel are "freedom fighters struggling against Israeli occupation." Does that mean that this Muslim blew himself up to protest against the Swedish occupation of Stockholm?
Sweden has no colonial history, at least not outside of northern Europe. It is a self-appointed champion of Third World countries and has virtually surrendered its third-largest city to immigrant mobs and substantial chunks of other cities, too. Swedish authorities are using the most extreme methods imaginable to suppress any dissent among the native people, who are being ethnically cleansed from their own land. The authorities always side with immigrants against the natives in the case of conflict. Muslims in Sweden can harass the natives as much as they want to and have access to all kinds of welfare goodies and a much higher standard of living than they would have in their own countries. In short, they have no imaginable, rational reason to complain, yet they still blow themselves up.
In Sweden, all the traditional excuses employed by Multiculturalists and Leftists throughout the Western world, fail. This leaves just one possible explanation, the only one never mentioned in Western mainstream media: That Muslims and their culture are fundamentally incompatible with our values and societies.
Hassan Moussa, who has worked as an imam at the largest mosque in the city of Stockholm, has earlier been accused of spreading double messages. What he said in his harsh speeches in Arabic didn't match the text as translated in Swedish. A journalist warned that "a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/1479.htm" target="_blank">Sweden's mosques are slowly but surely being taken over" by the Muslim Brotherhood. Following the 2010 suicide bombing, Moussa's recommendations for how to prevent similar events in the future involved giving more power to imams and having a "zero tolerance for Islamophobia."
Prohibiting all forms of criticism or mockery of Islam and its Prophet is an essential part of sharia, Islamic religious law. According to Islamic historical sources, individuals such as the poetess Asma bint Marwan were killed by the followers of Muhammad for having done nothing other than mocking Islam. This then became a part of the Sunna, the personal example of Muhammad and his companions, which is the most authoritative source of Islamic law next to the Koran itself. It was for the same reason that Theo van Gogh was murdered in Amsterdam in 2004. Yes, mainstream, traditional Islam today stipulates that those who mock Islam deserve to be murdered. No other major religion on this planet dictates anything similar.
It sounds nearly unbelievable to the average person that one of the largest religions on Earth, which is "respected" by the United Nations and political leaders worldwide, can be that bad, but this is unfortunately true. Not only is this the case, but the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the largest voting bloc at the UN, is teaming up with other dictatorships and African nations as we speak to ban "Islamophobia" across the world, also in the West.
Islam is more totalitarian than the most totalitarian ideologies that have ever existed in the Western world. Even Der Führer or Comrade Stalin never expected or demanded that every single man should copy all of their personal habits and their silly little mustaches, for which we should be eternally grateful. Islam, on the other hand, stipulates that all men everywhere and for all times should copy Muhammad's personal habits and example in minute detail.
Islam is a creed which says that men should urinate like Muhammad and that Muslims should wage a war against all other men on the planet until they, too, urinate like their Prophet. This is a provocative way of putting things, yes, but theologically speaking it is not incorrect. While Muhammad was not divine he was, as some Muslims say, the "living Koran." John L. Esposito in Islam: The Straight Path, one of the most pro-Islamic books in existence, states:
"Muslims look to Muhammad's example for guidance in all aspects of life: how to treat friends as well as enemies, what to eat and drink, how to make love and war. Nowhere is this seen more clearly than in the growth of Prophetic traditions....His impact on Muslim life cannot be overestimated, since he served as both religious and political head of Medina: prophet of God, ruler, military commander, chief judge, lawgiver. As a result, the practice of the Prophet, his Sunna or example, became the norm for community life. Muslims observed and remembered stories about what the Prophet said and did. These reports or traditions (hadith) were preserved and passed on in oral and written form. The corpus of hadith literature reveals the comprehensive scope of Muhammad's example; he is the ideal religiopolitical leader as well as the exemplary husband and father. Thus when many Muslims pray five times each day or make the pilgrimage to Mecca, they seek to pray as the Prophet prayed, without adding or subtracting from the way Muhammad is reported to have worshipped. Traditions of the Prophet provide guidance for personal hygiene, dress, eating, marriage, treatment of wives, diplomacy, and warfare."
According to sharia, non-Muslim dhimmis can on certain conditions be allowed to retain their lives under Islamic rule, provided that they remain totally submissive to Muslims at all times. Any perceived "insult," however slight, could immediately trigger violent reactions. In practice, a mere rumor that anybody has done something which displeases Muslims can cause retaliations and murders. This is how Christians in Pakistan or elsewhere live on a daily basis, constantly fearful of Jihadist attacks, and this is how many Muslims want us to live as well. Meanwhile, our authorities, intellectuals and mass media continue to import people who are plotting to murder us while we have our genetalia screened and checked at our airports.
If a single non-Muslim says anything critical about Islam, his entire community can in principle be punished for this. Basically, this means that if one cartoonist in Germany, the USA or Denmark makes a cartoon mocking Muhammad, this could potentially trigger Jihadist terrorist attacks against his entire country for "waging a war against Islam," because his "tribe" is held collectively responsible for his actions. This was exactly the Islamic logic behind Taimour Abdulwahab's terror attack in Stockholm. There is no such thing as an individual in this culture; the tribe is everything. Muslims, being good hypocrites, are always the first following an Islamic terrorist attack to state that all Muslims should not be punished for the actions of a few, yet this is precisely what their own laws prescribe for non-Muslims.
Before the general elections in 2006 the Swedish Muslim League, the largest Islamic organization in the country, published a long list where they not merely requested, but essentially demanded, separate family laws for Muslims; that public schools should employ imams to teach homogeneous classes of Muslims children in the language of their original homeland. (The Swedish city of Malmö already has pre-school classes where all teaching is conducted in Arabic. This is "good for integration."); a "mosque in every municipality," built through interest-free loans made available by local municipalities to demonstrate "Islam's right to exist in Sweden" and to "heighten the status of and respect for" Muslims; separation between boys and girls in gymnastics and swimming education; and laws instating Islamic holidays as public holidays for Muslims. Swedes should also ensure that all Muslims get two hours off from work during the congregational Friday prayer every week and an Islamic burial ground available in every municipality in which there are Muslims. Last, but not least, they demanded that the authorities and the already heavily censored, pro-Multicultural mass media should take even stronger steps to combat "Islamophobia" in the general public.
These demands were rejected back then, but they will be repeated, not just in Sweden but throughout the Western world. As long as we have sizeable Muslim communities here this is inevitable. Muslims are not here to live in peace as equals; they are here to colonize, subjugate, harass and dominate us. Their holy book, the Koran, demands nothing less.
But if all of this is true, how can we coexist peacefully with Muslims in our countries? The short answer is that we cannot. No matter how much you appease them, it will never be enough. As a matter of fact, since they come from a culture which respects only brute force they will despise you as weak and become more aggressive if you try to reason with them.
Their religion also states that Muslims are the "best of peoples"--the true master race--and that they are destined by Allah to rule all mankind. They are filled with illusions of grandeur and superiority, yet the harsh reality is that their societies are lagging behind those of others. This constitutes an inversion of the natural order which can only have been caused by demonic actions and must be reversed at all costs. As long as they remain in our countries, they will work to subvert and destroy us. It is quite literally a religious duty for them to do so.
So why don't you hear this from most Western political leaders or mass media? Because they are lying to you, plain and simple. The truth is that there is no such thing as a moderate Islam; that nobody has yet managed to come up with a credible theoretical way to reform Islam; and that there are no practical indications of any softening or modernization of Islam actually taking place. Since the adherents of this creed in its present form are waging a war of annihilation against us and the civilization we have created, this leaves only one possible conclusion if we wish to retain our culture and freedom: Physical separation. Islam and those who practice it must be totally and permanently removed from all Western nations.
Potential objections can be raised to this solution. One is that it might provoke Muslims and trigger a world war. To this I will say that our mere existence as free and self-ruled peoples constitutes a provocation to them. Besides, we are already in a world war. Technically speaking, it started 1400 years ago, the mother of all wars. Against European civilization it has witnessed two main phases, the first one with the Arabs in early medieval times, and the second one with the Turks in early modern times. This is the third Islamic Jihad, and it has penetrated deeper into Europe than ever before because we don't fight back. If the other guy walks up to you and starts punching you in the face then you are already in a fight, whether you want this or not. If you do not defend yourself properly then you have already lost.
Another objection is that expelling Muslims from the West would not end the war. They would merely continue from their original home countries, aided by missiles and modern technology. This could well be true. The separationist strategy does not imply that removing Islam from the West alone is all that will ever be required, only that this is the bare minimum that is acceptable. If Muslims remain aggressive, we retain the option of further actions, including directly targeting their holy cities of Mecca and Medina using conventional or non-conventional weapons. Having large numbers of Muslims in our societies is anyway very costly, and the aggressive fifth column in our midst will severely limit our freedom of action.
Finally, one could claim that the overall problem with the modern West is the general mass immigration and Multiculturalism promoted by our treasonous elites and that Islam merely constitutes a secondary infection. This is also partly true. No, just because Muslim immigration is especially bad does not mean that all other forms of immigration are unproblematic. Nevertheless, Muslims top the list over hostile aliens who do not belong in European or European-derived nations. The Islamic threat is real and needs to be dealt with.
The Serbian-American writer Serge Trifkovic, author of the book Defeating Jihad, has stated that the ongoing failure by their entrusted leaders to demographically protect European and European-derived nations constitutes the greatest betrayal in history. I am tempted to agree with him. In the end, the traitors and fifth columnists we have in our media and academia must be removed from power and replaced with people who are loyal to us and our nations.
[end of Fjordman article]
Definitely going on the Assigned Reading List when I get home tonight.
http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com
"Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive"
Posted by: LibertyAtStake | January 25, 2011 at 01:36 PM
Snake Hunter Sez,
January, 2011
Hell's Bells Ringing, Everywhere!
* Billionaire Politics in the U.S.
* Moscow Airport Suicide Bombing
* Roits in Alexandria & Cairo
* "Day of Rage" via Beirut's Hezbullah
* Rocks, Water Cannon, Tear Gas...
* Moderates Losing, Terror Winning
Allah's Apostle said: "I have become victorious with terror."
Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 52, 220
Where next? Paris, London, Madrid, Mumbai-India, New York City?
>
Crazy and senile, this arrogant & xenophobic old trouble-maker just sits here at his keyboard, making comments. Everyone knows, he's just a nervous old "fascist/racist war-monger" worrying about the quality of world leaders today;
Wondering...how many innocents will die tomorrow.
reb
___ ___
Posted by: Ralph E. | January 25, 2011 at 01:41 PM
Killed to keep the family's honor. Isn't it about time we fight to keep America's honor?..well said DEB but we are too busy apologizing!..pathetic!
Posted by: Angel | January 25, 2011 at 03:39 PM
"This blog is an exercise in the author's First Amendment rights." I absolutely insist that America gives you that right. I also believe that "honor killing" is not a right. However, it is wrong to conclude that this a religious thing. It is definitely cultural, and most Muslims would be against it (since they are not all from the same culture). I, also, believe that the Muslim American has rights too; and one of these is to not join in the secular culture of America. I'm a born, European background, Christian-raised American and I definitely dont want to "accept" the American culture!
Posted by: lmerklin | January 26, 2011 at 10:13 AM
As long as Americans continue slaughtering their own children in the millions they have no right to take the moral high-ground against those of other cultures who may also wish to to also terminate the lives of their own. The fact that the children on the one hand are unborn and the children on the other are already here doesn't matter.
Posted by: Mike | April 01, 2011 at 02:55 AM