On Civil Liberties

 By R.J. Godlewski
© August 31, 2011, All Rights Reserved.

“Therefore, God handed them over to impurity through the lusts of their hearts for the mutual degradation of their bodies. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and revered and worshiped the creature rather than the creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for the unnatural, and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God handed them over to their undiscerning mind to do what is improper. They are filled with every form of wickedness, evil, greed, and malice; full of envy, murder, rivalry, treachery, and spite. They are gossips and scandalmongers and they hate God. They are insolent, haughty, boastful, ingenious in their wickedness, and rebellious toward their parents. They are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know the just decree of God that all who practice such things deserve death, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.” ROMANS 1:24-32 NEW AMERICAN BIBLE

************

 

   There remains a growing incredulity within the world today that God can be silenced. Ignored, perhaps, but only amongst those who believe that the finite human mind can conceive of distancing themselves from the omnipotent.  Those who swirl within insolence, haughtiness, boastfulness, and ingenious wickedness often attribute great wonders to their deeds through the complexity of their deceits. They would rather burden their limited minds with affronts to God than the more genuine denial of servitude. That is, they would rather disrupt the intrinsic economy of adjustment than admit that they may not always deserve what they seek.

    Take the notorious case of Chaz nee Chastity Bono, for instance. More scientific and monetary effort had been applied to transform the former daughter of Sonny and Cher into the darling of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) community than would be required to readjust the individual’s thoughts back into natural rhythm. Now, this sorely tainted individual has invited to appear upon a nationally syndicated dancing competition for famous people. Why? Has Chaz Bono achieved any degree of success, popularity, or financial gain beyond that explicitly endorsed by the LGBT crowd?

    Equally damaging for the nation and the world is the notion that such transformations are duly accorded the same rights and privileges of racial minorities. Is the abomination of Chaz Bono in any way reflective of being from African, Asian, or Native American stock? Of course not. Civil Liberties are based exclusively upon the appearance of an individual as defined by their creation under God. That is, such “human rights” come from the natural order and hail from God alone, not transient government institutions. Or, as the Catechism of the Catholic Church reminds us, human rights arise “prior to society and must be recognized by it” and represent “the basis of moral legitimacy of every authority” and “by flouting them, or refusing to recognize them in its positive legislation, a society undermines its own moral legitimacy.” (Paragraph #1930).

    By denying the human dignity of Chastity Bono, modern society simply denied her the right to suffer through incredulous burdens placed upon her by God’s Will. It remains argued that few African-Americans, for instance, would willingly undergo procedure to transform his or herself into a Caucasian (the late Michael Jackson being one of the few such abominations)  despite the hardships of being born a minority. Each of us bears their own cross to endure.

    The LGBT community has thus done a great disservice to civil rights – as defined by the notion that all humans are created equal and deserving of equal protection under the law – by incorporating unnatural, personal traits within the context of birthright. Those who discriminate based upon race are just as diabolical as those who discriminate against God, for God holds the upper hand regarding creation. If Chastity Bono had been born a female, then it rests upon no mere human to disrupt the will of God. Perhaps, this is why the LGBT community endorses ignorance of God?

    The sole basis for human (or animal, for that matter) sexuality rests with procreation of the species. Males mate with females to produce more males and females. In the human condition, this natural act reinforces itself with the rearing of the family. Both fathers and mothers bear equal, but distinct roles in the rearing of the children. Mothers, by virtue of their life-giving nutrition, trend to remain with the child longer than the father does. Fathers, by virtue of their physical characteristics, withstand the worst of protecting, sheltering, and feeding the mother and older children. It remains an undeniable fact of human evolution ever since there had been humans to illustrate this normality.

    It is, therefore, no great revelation that groups that distrust the natural, such as the LGBT community, proceed with the destruction of life itself. The popularity of the LGBT lifestyle could have – and did – only manifested itself after supportive progressive liberals obtained the “right” for institutionalized infanticide – abortion. By declaring that human life was not a creation, they thus ignored the reality of a Creator. By declaring that the human fetus was nothing more than a useless appendix of the human body, they degraded humanity in favor of the evil. In short, by a presumptuous interpretation of basic human rights, they decreed that such rights flowed from the heart of men and not the will of God.

    Not being satisfied with the dismissal of the human child, the LGBT community and their various cohorts moved on to dismiss the dignity and integrity of humanity’s various races. By declaring a lifestyle as important as a race, LGBT members climbed aboard the civil rights train without paying for his or her ticket. By no means have they endured the abomination of slavery. By no means have they accepted God’s Will despite the hardship’s such recognition bore upon their families. Instead, they implanted their parasitical teeth into Martin Luther King, Jr.’s call for human equality by endorsing disruptive, violent, and unnatural affronts against the very God that Dr. King served.

    In the direct words of the U.S. Fourteenth Amendment, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Only the progressive liberals (and their friends within the LGBT) find trouble in understanding this statement.

    “Thou shalt not discriminate” thus translates into what, for example, IBM is forced to write upon its career Website: “All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, national origin, genetics, disability, age, or veteran status.” Progressive governance takes “love they neighbor as thyself” and, through litigation, muddles the issue by incessantly segregating the human population into what is now apparently declared to involve “genetics”.

    An oft-asked question necessarily arises on whether an employer should be able to deny employment to a gay applicant. This remains a duplicitous question designed to entrap the fainthearted. However, I am not so appeasing and I will gladly answer the question. No, in fact, any employer cannot deny employment to a gay applicant. That action denies the equality of the individual in question as defined by his or her existence as a human individual. That said, an employer should be able to deny employment or terminate an employee based upon homosexuality.

    The act of homosexuality bears upon the unnatural and this provides employers with sufficient reason to suspect their integrity as an employee. The open endorsement of homosexuality also infringes upon the sensibilities of others who may, for instance, believe that homosexuality is a grave depravity against God’s plan. Homosexuality remains an implied right whereas such religious beliefs are fundamentally protected by the U.S. Constitution. By Congress mandating laws that lead to IBM’s Web declaration, it violates the U.S. First Amendment, which states rather categorically that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Mandating the acceptance of an unnatural lifestyle prohibits all religious minded individuals – especially Christians – from freely practicing their faith. Again, the Progressive and LGBT communities attack religion through artificially enforcing a “separation between church and state” that exists nowhere within Constitutional Law.

    If an employer can terminate an individual for smoking crack cocaine, pilfering the till, or otherwise violating the safety and (perceived) security of its workers, then it makes sense that they can terminate an employee for grossly unnatural behavior. Yet, again, the Progressive and LGBT communities pounce upon the opportunity to enforce their agenda upon an otherwise free society. Part of this effort rests their control of the trial lawyers. If there remains any doubt as to the power of this lobby, might I call attention to the Sam Bernstein Law Offices in Detroit where the notorious legal ‘family’ now sponsors sporting events and sports shows on television? In economically stagnant Michigan, it leaves one wondering how any organization that survives on litigation alone can afford to spend untold millions on television shows and marketing. There remains little doubt that such “family” lawyers leap beyond mere assistance to “honorable” victims and transgress into suing companies for questionable injuries of perception.

    I have, from the earliest moments of my life, realized that humans came in all shapes and colors. My pre-kindergarten friend was Chinese. My kindergarten best friend was born without arms and had to endure life with a Terminator-esque vest with open claw appendages. In grade school and throughout high school my best friends were Jewish. In the Navy, I purchased my first vehicle “in halves” with a gay sailor. I also served as Confirmation sponsor for his entry into the Catholic Church. I did not hold his being a homosexual against him, but I did not support his case when his “open” homosexuality ultimately led to his discharge from the Navy when he was sent stateside to attend school. His choice of action sacrificed his rights as an individual (much in the same manner that people can hate Timothy McVeigh who, prior to OKC, had been a decorated war hero).

    Civil rights are fundamentally important to society as a whole and bear upon all of us to treat one another with dignity and respect. They exist to serve the creation of the human person above all other species. Yet, the human person is not exactly a free creature (just ask anyone in Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc.). He or she remains bound by free will – the ability to conduct actions based upon accepting the ultimate consequences of such action. We can witness this paradox within the Second Amendment. No government institution or agency can deny us of our fundamental right (as determined by God alone) to protect ourselves. Yet, if we employ our firearms to intentionally and indiscriminately inflict harm upon others, then we forfeit our right to keep and bear arms. God grants civil authority to punish us commensurate with the crime.

    The same holds true with differentiating the gay individual from the homosexuality they endorse. I might, for instance, believe that a child molester should be hung, drawn, and quartered and the pieces fed to ravenous sharks. The aspiring Christian in me, however, acknowledges the depravity of the individual and succumbs to their incarceration and rehabilitation despite the two objectives being diametrically opposed within the American penal system. Love the sinner, not the sin, in other words.

    It remains my contention that people are fundamentally equal despite their mental and physical uniqueness. I respect, for instance, the rights of Muslims to practice their faith despite my inner knowledge that such beliefs are detrimental to God’s Salvation. It is not up to me as to when such Muslims may eventually come to “see the light” and, so, my only diligent course of action rests with protecting their lives until God sees fit to sway them into his Kingdom. I, therefore, protect the Muslim – not Islam (which I personally feel is a disruptive manifestation of a man similar to the satanic disruption of civil rights via the LGBT agenda).

    I, with my many faults and liabilities, try to lead by example. Sometimes I succeed. At other times, I fail miserably. That remains the beauty of the human condition – only God determines when the “time is up.” As long as we possess a heartbeat, we are able to redeem ourselves and repent of our ways. Even the vilest of the human species (e.g., pre-Christian Saint Paul) can affect a turnaround for the greatness of God. Perhaps this represents the truest nature of civil right.

************

R.J. Godlewski (GOD LESS KEY) is an independent counterterrorism consultant, the director of the private International Nuclear Emergency Response Team [INERT], and the author of several novels, commentaries, and professional articles. His most recent article is “Latte Intelligence: The Divorce of Shock Creativity and Special Information Operations,” which appears in the current issue of American Intelligence Journal He is also the author and architect of the Internet-based Independent Counterterrorist training program. He is currently completing his B.A. in Intelligence Studies at American Military University with a concentration in Middle East terrorism and presently holds an undergraduate certificate in Explosive Ordnance Disposal. He intends to begin a Master’s program in Military Studies -- Asymmetrical Warfare during the fall 2011 semester to which he plans to add a graduate certificate in Security Management, and is a veteran of both the United States Navy and Navy Reserve. He can be reached at rjgodlewski(at)rjgodlewski.com. 

 

Comments

[Leticia]

I sincerely believe that those people truly suffer from severe mental illness and need professional help, NOT surgery.

Regardless of what Ms. Bono did to her body, she is still a woman and no amount of surgery can change that.

[R.J. Godlewski]

Leticia,

You are correct. Our soul is created at conception and does not 'change' along with our body. That which Ms./Mr. Bono toils with is affected merely by the senses, of which we mere corporeal beings use to orchestrate our earthly lives.

When we die, our souls become disenjointed from our bodies until the Resurrection on the Last Day reunites them in perfection. At which time, Ms./Mr. Bono will realize that she/he is definitely not the master of her/his life.

R.J.

[Debbie]

Breaking news as we posted your article, R.J.:

ABC receives complaints about Chaz addition to 'DANCING With The Stars'...

Will he dance "as a woman or a man" viewers ask.

Shortly after that news, we get this:

"'Chaz Bono stole my thunder': Pregnant man claims Cher's son took his spot on Dancing With The Stars"

The "pregnant man" is also a 'transgender male', meaning he was born a women.

Both Chaz and Beatie (pregnant man) live with women (women who were born women, stayed women, but are apparently gay).

I'm not exactly sure how that works out R.J.

If your lover is a women, who has surgery to become a man, gaining a male sex organ, does she/he still appeal to a female who prefers having 'sex' with another female?

Oh R.J., I'm so confused?!?!?!?!

God must be so disappointed.

[R.J. Godlewski]

Debbie,

When humans play God, they realize just how inadequate they are at playing human.

I pray for everyone's souls...

R.J.

[Jenny]

Debbie and RJ, what I find amazing is that so many Christians are "addicted" to DWTS and never miss an episode. I am appalled by that. My daughter, who is in full-time Christian service, has a roommate who "must" watch DWTS every time it's on. My daughter tells me she has to retire to her room in order not to be embarrassed and feel convicted over the filth of that program. The grown daughter of our former pastor was also a great "fan" of the show and made no bones about never missing it when it was on. I think the preachers had better start thundering righteousness and naming these silly carnal affectations from the pulpit, lest Christians become exactly like the world in their attitude toward the abomination that is sodomy. This coming Saturday there will be a LBTG "pride" parade on Main Street in my town of Columbia, South Carolina. Last year when this was done, the local media made it a point to report that there was "no opposition" to the parade. Our pastor has asked the men to assemble at the State House this time and provide that (peaceful) opposition to this dangerous abomination of a lifestyle. It's time those who know the truth begin to PUSH BACK. We should have done it a long time ago. No more Mr. Nice Guy. By that I don't mean abusing anyone, but simply standing up and firmly refusing to back down with your message of the eternal truths of the Word of God.

BTW Debbie, thank you so much for your thoughtful comment on my post about Melanie. I will certainly look for a copy of that book.

[Skunkfeathers]

Having been liberated from TV watching some time ago, I don't watch any of what passes for "entertainment" these days. So Chaz Bono can abominate on Dancing With The Politically Corrective Surgicals all he/she wants.

[David (DW)]

Skunkfeathers

If I want a good movie, I have NetFlix. If I want good TV, I go to YouTube and watch the Classics. Cable just isn't worth it anymore. 100 channels of toxic waste. The rest of my time is spent dealing with the realities of life and what is most important to me: defending our American freedoms from the bastard scum who are trying to destroy them.

[Evola33]

"Chaz" Bono just another nihilistic Illuminati product born of Satanist military intelligence associated parents; if you really, really want to know CB's roots and connections and have the stomach for it, cf. http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr100.html : Inside the LC: The Strange But mMstly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation.
Bono referenced part 8 and 14.
You might want to begin at part one, depending on how deep down the rabbit hole you dare to go.
You're gonna wish you took the blue pill. Get ready to have your rock 'n roll ideology shattered.

[Debbie]

Thanks everyone for your input.

I don't watch any reality TV, it's too much like the old Jerry Springer or Geraldo Rivera shows, low-life and not worth my time.

Evola33: I'll check out that link.

Jenny: You are very welcome, I hope you enjoy the book.