« THE SWORD OF MILITANT ISLAM | Main | Tactical Lessons from the Practical Maccabees. »

January 22, 2012


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference MITT ROMNEY MUST NOT BE PRESIDENT:



Snake Hunter Sez,

I would like the author of this article to expound on his number 4:

"Mitt Romney being a politically correct idiot regarding Islam and Jihad"

Being an independent and rather cautious skeptic that normally shuns crude & vicious propaganda, I'm quite interested to have a clear explanation from Mr. Frederick W. Dame, without the name-calling, please.

Whatever else candidate Romney might be, he is certainly not.. an islam-o-phile, nor is he an idiot. - reb
___ ___

Frederick William Dame

Mr. Snake Hunter!
This is a reply to your comment. An idiot is an imbecile, a blockhead, a person who shows extreme folly or stupidity, or someone who utters or does something foolishly and stupidly. I could have said that Mitt Romney's views on Islam are idiotic. It amounts to the same stance. Mitt Romney is an idiot regarding Islam. I will not take the statement back or excuse myself for it.
I said that Mitt Romney must be criticized for his being a politically correct idiot regarding Islam and jihad. In some other matters, precisely economic matters, Mitt Romney is surely not an idiot.

Mr. Snake Hunter, evidently you did not read the complete essay at http://www.colony14.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/mittromneymustnotbepresident.pdf. Otherwise you would not have asked for a clarification. For your convenience and the convenience of other readers of the comments section regarding this essay, I herewith present you with the complete section concerning Mitt Romney's views on Islam. Furthermore, should you still think that Islam is not what the red comments present, which appears only at thelink, I recommend the following politically incorrect, and therefore true, books:
- Bostom, Andrew G., editor, The Legacy of Islamic Semitism From Sacred Texts to Solemn History, 2008.
- Bostom, Andrew G., editor, The Legacy of Jihad Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims, 2005.
- http://www.masada2000.org/islam.html
- McCarthy, Andrew C. The Grand Jihad How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, 2010.
- O'Neill, John J., Holy Warriors Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization, 2010.
- Richardson, Don. Secrets of the Koran Revealing Insights Into Islam's Holy Book, 2003.

4. Mitt Romney's Views on Islam.
In an article published on July 4, 2009, Pamela Geller of http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/ reported that she asked Mitt Romney about his opinion of Islam in an interview on July 3, 2009 about a major speech on national security that he had given on June 29, 2009 at the Heritage Foundation. In the speech, Mitt Romney "referred to Islam only insofar as he referred to 'jihadism,' a term he used four times in the address, and to 'mullahs' and 'ayatollahs.'" Pamela Geller continues, "I asked Romney how he'd respond to Muslim complaints that his speech characterized Islam in entirely sinister terms. His response surprised me."
What follows is Mitt Romney's complete statement as reported by Pamela Geller. It is highlighted in yellow to symbolize Mitt Romney's cowardly stance.

“I spoke about three major threats America faces on a long term basis. Jihadism is one of them, and that is not Islam. If you want my views on Islam, it’s quite straightforward. Islam is one of the world’s great religions and the great majority of people in Islam want peace for themselves and peace with their maker. They want to raise families and have a bright future. There is, however, a movement in the world known as jihadism. They call themselves jihadists and I use the same term. And this jihadist movement is intent on causing the collapse of moderate Muslim states and the assassination of moderate Muslim leaders. It is also intent on causing collapse of other nations in the world. It’s by no means a branch of Islam. It is instead an entirely different entity. In no way do I suggest it is a part of Islam.”

Not even this statement by Mitt Romney is correct in its content. It is so very politically correct that it is wishy-washy to the core and Islam-appeasing crap. In appeasement of Islam, Mitt Romney surpasses Neville Chamberlain in his appeasement of Adolf Hitler when he gave the Sudetenland to the Nazi dictator to guarantee "peace in our time." Let's examine Mitt Romney's statement sentence-by-sentence. This author's comments are in red (only in the link) to symbolize the bloody truth.

“I spoke about three major threats America faces on a long term basis." Jihadism is one of them, and that is not Islam. Jihadism is at the center of Islam. Jihadism is its heartbeat. Islam does not exist without jihadism. Muslims accept the fact that the Koran requires them to wage war against the infidels, the non-believers. It is the Muslim duty to commit jihad. Islam divides the world into two camps: the Dar Al-Islam (Islam) and the Dar al-Harb (the unbelievers). Yet, the literal meaning of Dar al-Harb in English is house of war. Jihad is the fundamental duty and responsibility of the Muslim to expand Islam throughout the world. This has to be the result because Muslims believe that it is their destiny to live off the infidels. There may be times of truce, but there will never be lasting peace until the complete world is subjugated by Islam. If Mitt Romney or the reader will not accept this author's expertise, they should read the following Suras: Sura 8:40, Sura 9:124, Sura 24:56. According to Robert Erwin in discussing the matter of concluding peace during the Crusades, "Muslim religious law could not countenance the formal conclusion of any sort of peace with the infidel." The truth of that statement still holds. Moreover, "Since … jihad is a state of permanent war, it excludes the possibility of peace, but it … does allow for provisional truces in accordance with the requirements of the political situation." Under Islam there is nothing but death!

If you want my views on Islam, it’s quite straightforward." The viewpoint may be straightforward, but the logic is totally missing. This is another reason why Mitt Romney should not be President of the United States of America. As the above presentation proves, Mitt Romney is not straightforward on anything, except that claiming that he is straightforward. There are only two views that a person can have regarding Islam: do not tell the facts and say everything in a sugar-sweet-manner and be popular; or tell the truth, which will result in upsetting politically correct people and making one unpopular.

"Islam is one of the world’s great religions" "Islam is not a religion. Considering Islam a religion is a mistake that could cost millions of lives. Islam is a political movement set to conquer the world. It is the Borg of the non-fictional world. Islam has one goal and one goal alone: to assimilate or to destroy." Islam is not a religion that believes in God. It is a heathen movement that believes in Allah, the Moon God and in the political conquest of the world. It is, therefore, an ideology clothed in quasi-religious apparel. As the Koran states:
Sura 9:33 He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the Religion of Truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion, however much the idolaters may be averse.
Sura 48:28 He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the religion of truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion. And Allah suffices as a Witness.
Sura 61:9 He has sent His messenger with the guidance and the true religion, and will make it dominate all religions, in spite of the idol worshipers.
The word triumph in Arabic and its use in the Koran mean violent defeat. It comes in the context of warfare. The Koran has 109 war verses. They are:
Sura 2:178, 179, 190, 191, 193, 216, 217, 218, 244; Sura 3:121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 140, 155, 165, 166, 167, 169, 173, 195; Sura 4:71, 72, 74, 75, 76, 77, 84, 89, 91, 94, 95, 100, 102, 104; Sura 5:33, 35, 38; Sura 8:7, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, 39, 42, 45, 59, 65, 67, 69, 71, 72, 74, 75; Sura 9:12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 29, 36, 38, 39, 41, 44, 52, 73, 81, 83, 86, 88, 92, 111, 120, 122, 123; Sura 16:110; Sura 22:39, 78; Sura 29:6, 69; Sura 33:7, 18, 20, 25, 26; Sura 47:20; Sura 48:16, 22; Sura 59:2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14; Sura 60:9; Sura 61:4; Sura 63:4; Sura 64:14; Sura 66:9; Sura 73:20.
Moreover, in the Koran there is one threat of going to hell for every 7.9 verses.
Islam is such a peaceful religion!!!

"and the great majority of people in Islam want peace for themselves and peace with their maker." Of course, the great majority of people believing in Islam want peace and all believers in Islam want peace according to the dictates of Islam. That is why Muslims say Islam is a peaceful religion. Islam is only peaceful if you are part of the Umma, the world collective of Islam. As for wanting peace with their maker? According to their belief in Allah, they believe in the Moon God. Allah is the Arabic name for the god of the moon. Were Muslims made by the Moon God? As such, it is not illogical to say that those who believe in Allah are lunatics. Certainly, if Mitt Romney does not comprehend the reality of Islam, then in matters regarding Islam, Mitt Romney is a lunatic as well.

"They want to raise families and have a bright future." Who doesn't? However, their violent and destructive brainwashing over the centuries states that it must be done within the confines and parameters of Islam. Bright futures can be acquired and maintained only in a free society based on the economic principles of free markets (capitalism).

"There is, however, a movement in the world known as jihadism." Jihadism is not a different movement from Islam. It is a battle cry of war against everything that is not Islamic. Jihadism is prevalent in the Koran. Here are the Suras that have jihad as their explicit content: Sura 2:216, 217, 218, 191; Sura 4:74, 76, 95; Sura 8:12, 15, 16, 39, 41, 65; Sura 9:5, 29, 73, 111, 123; Sura 48:20. Mitt Romney! You have a lot of reading and learning to do!

"They call themselves jihadists and I use the same term." They just do not call themselves jihadists. They call themselves Islam(ic) jihadists. Mitt Romney can use the same terminology, but he should know what the term means. He has no idea what the term jihadism involves. Jihad is institutionalized in the Islamic world. Jihad is not a sporadic event in the historical past or present. Jihad is the normal life function in Islam and the Islamic theory of world domination.

"And this jihadist movement is intent on causing the collapse of moderate Muslim states and the assassination of moderate Muslim leaders." There are no moderate Muslim states. Indeed, according to the psyche of Islam there are no states and no nations. The concept of nationalism does not exist in Islam. It is a Western development. Western nationalism must be defeated because to institute nationalism in Islam would cause the eventual destruction of the Umma, the world collective of Islam. If a leader of a Muslim country appears to be moderate in relations with the Western World, then it is a duty for a Muslim to get rid of such a ruler. Therefore, the sanctioning of assassination for a Muslim means that the concept of what constitutes a religious duty is being implemented.

"It is also intent on causing collapse of other nations in the world." This has been the goal of Islam since its inception. The lunatic Muhammad did nothing else but collapse other tribes. Not only did Muhammad collapse the tribes, they were exterminated. Other regions and non-Islamic tribes and countries that did not ascribe to the dogma of the Moon God and Muhammad suffered the same fate. If the military attempt was unsuccessful, then the military generals or the naval admirals were executed. Yet, it was not because they failed to conquer. They were executed because they failed to further the expansion of Islam. One historical example represents all of the other executions. The commander of the Ottoman forces at the siege of Vienna in 1683 was Kara Mustafa Pascha, Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mohammed IV. On December 25, 1683, Kara Mustafa Pascha was executed on the order of Mohammed IV, not only because Kara Mustafa Pascha had not been successful in expanding the Ottoman Empire's territories into Europe, but more importantly because he had failed to bring an expansion of Islam into Europe.
Islam has basic strategies to achieve world conquest. Succinctly, some of them are:
- Massive legal and illegal immigration into nations Islam has targeted for conquest.
- Achieve political power by being democratically elected to office by the promotion and support of Islamic candidates and Islamic-oriented candidates to political office.
- Undertake measures to destroy that country's heritage and culture and always expand Islamic influence.
- Infiltrate colleges, universities, and long-established organizations and make them oriented towards Islam.
- Use a strategy of jihad and stealth under the guise of al-taqiyya, but cry racism and hate against Islam whenever possible.

"It’s by no means a branch of Islam." This is a true statement. Yet, Mitt Romney fails to comprehend that jihad is the core of Islam. Mitt Romney fails to comprehend Islam. Islam is a force that has always "extolled war as a sacred duty, sanctioned the enslavement and killing of non-believers as a religious obligation, sanctioned the judicial use of torture, and provided for the execution of apostates and heretics. All of these attitudes, which, taken together, are surely unique in the religious traditions of mankind, can be traced to the very beginnings of that faith. Far from being manifestations of a degenerate phase of Islam, all of them go back to the founder of the faith himself," Muhammad.

"It is instead an entirely different entity." It proclaims to be a different entity. Islamists and Muslims will argue that it is. Yet their position will be nothing more than abrogation and dualism. Abrogation means that if there is a contradiction in the Koran, a later verse supersedes the earlier verse. The earlier verse is still correct and the latter verse does not contradict it. The earlier verse can be used to present the positive side of Islam, while the latter verse can be used to call Muslims to Jihad. For example, Jihad supersedes tolerance. Jihad is the other side of the coin of active world domination. Verses may contradict each other on the one side, but on the other side they are still true. This is Islamic dualism. Jihad is not a separate entity. Jihad is the heartbeat of Islam until the whole world believes in the Moon God.

"In no way do I suggest it is a part of Islam." Regardless of what Mitt Romney suggests regarding Islam and jihadism, it is off target. Indeed, Mitt Romney's statements are more than an attempt at being politically correct. They are sucking and licking statements! That is what the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Islamic organizations in the United States of America, as well as Islamic organizations around the world like!

Anyone who is so politically correct to believe the contrary is, in my estimation, a politically correct idiot regarding Islam.


Frederick William Dame


Snake Hunter Sez,

That's much better, sir!

I prefer straight talk, rather than wishy-washy name-calling when we're dealing with a 1400 yr old Death Cult.

As to Romney Vs Gingrich, I trust the majority of independents and conservative republicans to give us their judgements by May 1st.

I would remind the folks here on Right Truth that in 2008, far too many blacks, 96 percent, and over 50% latino voted skin-color over logic & reason, and our country cannot afford a repetition.

The eventual winner, be it Gingrich or Romney, must chose his V.P. running-mate
with that highly emotional 'race factor' in mind.

Florida's young senator Marco Rubio should be the top contender by May or June, 2012 to fill that position.


Postscript: See my 'link-page.. You'll find "No-Slappz" Andrew C. McCarthy's book - Grand Jihad - listed at the top. - reb

___ ___


It is irrelevant who the GOP candiddate is , none has the wit or wisdom to stop Barack getting four more years.

Get used to it christian wingnut prolife godbots.


Snake Hunter Opines,

It's remarkable that most progressive/democratic minds are so alike in their inane notions of "christian wing-nuts" that they are willfully blinded by their own self-love and vanity, and without shame, do it publicly in the hope of gathering admiration from the great, unwashed masses.

___ ___

New Attitude.

Don't you just love free speech? Especially if you post as DemocratsAbroad.

Oh, then again, maybe not.

R.J. Godlewski

"none has the wit or wisdom."

Pretty brave words from someone who supports another who once claimed the existence of 57 states, thrice mispronounced the word Corpsmen, and still refuses to show his allegedly proud college record.

Personally, I would much rather be an aspiring but tainted Christian and let the world think that I am somehow dumb than to say that I was a Progressive and remove all doubt... ;o)


his entire plan is conservative tard. do you listen to anything he has ever said. he wants to get people to help themselves through his economic plan. you are a tard in your first sentence.


This article was written in January. Romney was running against a full lineup of Republicans and Independents. Everyone had their choice and Romney was not the first choice of many at that time.

After the primaries and after it was clear that Romney would be the Republican candidate, Conservatives, Independents (many), some Democrats, and Republicans rallied around him.

If the choice is 4 more years of Obama, Romney is light years better than Obama and gets our votes.

The comments to this entry are closed.



  • Debbie Hamilton

Most Influential Blogger Award

2011 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

2010 Fabulous Blog Award

  • Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Thinking Blogger Award

Support Right Truth


April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      


Never Again Is Now

Book Club Now Reading

Right Truth Mosaic

J. Post


Jerusalem Post

  • Vote for Right Truth articles

I support Israel

Wikio Blogs

  • Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Politics

Blogroll Me

Thank You Troops



  • This blog is an exercise in the author's First Amendment Rights as pertaining to Free Speech with all the protections as afforded & granted by the Constitution of the United States of America. The blog owner is not responsible for content of sites linking to this blog or sites that this blog links to. Opinions quoted on this blog or left as comments on this blog, do not necessarily represent the opinions of the blog owner. Opinions included in articles written by anyone other than the blog owner, do not necessarily represent the opinions of the blog owner. If you are offended by anything written, quoted, excerpted, referenced, linked to ... on this blog: Then go somewhere else.

  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2005


  • Debbie Hamilton