By Frederick William Dame
According to William Jacobson in the very precisely-written-content-correct essay titled Clarity at http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/,
"We are on a path to nominate someone who campaigned against Reagan, campaigned against the Contract with America, campaigned against those who are pro-Life, campaigned against 2nd Amendment rights, campaigned against conservatism, and designed and enacted the precursor to Obamacare from which he will not back away."1
These are six concise reasons why a Republican Party candidate other than Mitt Romney should be President of the United States of America. This author believes that there are some other prime grounds why Mitt Romney should not be the next President. The arguments have to do with
1. Mitt Romney being wishy-washy
2. Mitt Romney and the natural born citizen clause
3. Mitt RomneyCare in Massachusetts
4. Mitt Romney being a politically correct idiot regarding Islam and jihad
The following is a presentation of these areas at some length so that the reader can be in a better position to decide whom s/he will support in the 2012 Republican Party primary for the presidential election. As was the case with Barack Hussein Obama, it is the presidential primary that inevitably indicates the possible future of the United States of America. With Barack Hussein Obama, there is no positive future. With Mitt Romney, the American future will not be remarkably different.
1. Mitt Romney is a RINO, a Republican In Name Only.
There is no political action that Mitt Romney has taken in his political career that proves that he is conservative, or even close to being conservative, to say nothing of being a Republican. Conservativism and the free market economy are what made the United States of America a great nation. It was not leftist politics or progressivism. Even the progressivism of Theodore Roosevelt (1858- 1919, President 1901-1909) was conservative when compared to the protest- progressive movement under the dictatorship of Barack Hussein Obama. In the 2008 presidential primary, Mitt Romney flipped more than he flopped and flopped more than he flipped. He was more liberal than conservative, then more conservative than liberal on abortion,2 then more conservative than liberal, then more liberal than conservative on illegal immigration,3 and the same regarding the right to bear arms,4 etc.5 These positions mean that Mitt Romney wants to transform America, also. Those who want to transform America hate America, as the conduct of Barack Hussein Obama proves. This process of transformation is destruction that has been with American politics for over one hundred years. In the 1912 presidential election campaign, the staunch progressive Democrat Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924, President 1913-1921) stated, “all that Progressives ask or desire is permission...to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle.” Translated into English this statement means that the Constitution for the United States of America should be expanded in its powers to promote an expansion of government powers. What was blocking the expansion, according to Woodrow Wilson was that “some citizens of this country have never got beyond the Declaration of Independence. ... The Declaration of Independence did not mention the questions of our day.”6 This neither was the intent of the Declaration of Independence, nor was it the intent of the Constitution. The intent was explicitly stated by the Republican President John Calvin Coolidge Jr. (1872-1933, President 1923–1929) on the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence in 1926.
"It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning cannot be applied to this great charter.
If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions.
If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction cannot lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary Fathers."7
According to President Coolidge, backwards is the direction of the Democratic Party.
This author adds that no advance and no progress beyond the provisions of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States of America are necessary to live in freedom. (continue reading http://www.colony14.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/mittromneymustnotbepresident.pdf )