BY: FERN SIDMAN
As facts about the September 11th attack on the United States embassy in
Benghazi, Libya continue to unravel at a furious pace, scathing accusations of
culpability are being hurled by both prominent Republican leaders and Democrats
regarding exactly who is at fault for the heinous murders of US Ambassador
Christopher Stevens and three other American personnel.
On Sunday morning, October 14th, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham (R)
leveled conspiracy charges against the White House for attempting to cover up
the attack. Appearing on CBS' "Face the Nation", Senator Graham said he knows
for a fact the administration was told within 24 hours of the incident it was
carried out by al-Qaeda operatives.
For days and weeks following the attack, the White House had exclusively
assigned blame for the deadly attack on "an excessive response to an anti-Islam
video" amongst Muslim demonstrators who were protesting outside of the embassy.
The controversial video entitled, "Innocence of Muslims" which appeared on
YouTube in English and Arabic-dubbed versions, depicted a deranged, womanizing
Prophet Muhammad facing a hypothetical trial. No mention of a premeditated and
heavily armed strike on the embassy by al-Qaeda forces in Libya were made by
President Obama, despite the fact that Congressional testimony revealed that the
White House had been informed on day one by intelligence gathering agencies that
the attack was an act of carefully coordinated terrorism by al-Qaeda.
During a round of television news talk show appearances, United Nations US
Ambassador Susan Rice had reiterated the White House's position on this issue by
saying the attack could be attributed to a “spontaneous outbreak” of violence by
demonstrators who were provoked by a “hateful” movie denigrating the Muslim
prophet Muhammad.
“They’re trying to sell a narrative, quite frankly, that the mid East, the
wars are receding, and al-Qaeda’s been dismantled,” the South Carolina
Republican said. “And to admit that our embassy was attacked by al-Qaeda
operatives and Libya, leading from behind, didn’t work, I think undercuts that
narrative. They never believed the media would investigate. Congress was out of
session. It just caught up with them.”
Echoing Senator Graham's charges
of a White House cover up on the Benghazi affair was former Republican
presidential candidate and House Speaker Newt Gingrich who blasted the Obama
administration’s handling of the terrorist attack. He said in a "tweet" that the
growing scandal is "bigger than Watergate", adding that, "No one died at
Watergate! The Obama lies about Benghazi and Biden's deliberate lies Thursday
night should be a bigger scandal than Nixon,” declared Gingrich.
Early in the televised vice-presidential debate on October 11th between Joe
Biden and Rep Paul Ryan (R), Vice President Biden told his audience regarding
the Benghazi attack, "We weren't told they wanted more security; we did not know
they wanted more security."
“It is clear the Obama team decided to have the vice president lie about an
event that killed four Americans, including an ambassador,” Gingrich continued
in his tweet. Moreover, he believes that the facts surrounding the September
11th terrorist strike should be a major focus of the remaining two presidential
debates. “We've now had over a month of dishonesty and cover-up from Obama team
about Benghazi,” Gingrich wrote on Saturday. “Getting to truth should be the
number one goal in the next two debates.”
The White House was under intense pressure on Friday to disclose whether
any senior administration officials were aware of requests for increased
diplomatic security in Libya ahead of the fatal September 11th attack in
Benghazi, White House press secretary, Jay Carney, came under fire by the media
during Friday's news briefing about what precisely Biden had meant when he made
that comment. The Romney campaign has seized upon testimony given to a
congressional committee the day before the debate that suggested requests for
beefed-up diplomatic security had indeed been made to the Obama administration
prior to the attack.
Carney said that Biden's "we weren't told" remark related specifically and
only to the White House. "The vice-president was speaking about himself and the
president and the White House. He was not referring to the administration." He
added that there were countless diplomatic facilities around the world and it
was left to security experts in the state department to ensure adequate
protection for embassy staff abroad.
Carney then attempted to shift the focus of the controversy back on to the
Republicans by charging that Republicans in congress dramatically reduced the
budget for diplomatic security "in order to cut taxes for the wealthiest 2% in
this country". Carney said that under the budget proposal of Romney's running
mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, non-military discretionary funding would be cut by 19% by
2014, which the Obama campaign has calculated would lead to a cut of $300
million in embassy security.
Repeatedly circumventing questions from reporters about whether President
Obama had been informed about several previous threats to attack the Benghazi
consulate in the days leading up to the September 11th attack, Carney said, "I
cannot get into the specific details of a classified briefing. There was no
actionable intelligence that suggested there would be an attack at the Benghazi
facility."
Dan Senor, a senior Romney adviser, questioned the administration's grasp
of vital national security issues. He said Biden's comment had pointed to "the
larger failures of the administration to be completely transparent about the
terrorist attacks in Benghazi and the security situations leading up to the
attacks."
On Wednesday, the Congressional Oversight and Government Reform Committee
was presented with a diplomatic cable sent on August 2nd by Ambassador Stevens
to the State Department in Washington asking for an additional 11 security
personnel to be added to the rotation of 24. Though the 11 were to replace
temporary security staff who were leaving, Stevens made clear in the cable that
violence and terrorism were a threat amid a volatile political landscape.
He wrote: "Due to the level of threat in regards to crime, political violence
and terrorism, post feels this is an appropriate number of LES [locally employed
staff] security personnel needed to further embassy diplomatic outreach
missions. Violent security incidents continue to take place due to the lack of a
coherent national Libyan security force and the strength of local militias and
large numbers of armed groups Host national security support is lacking and
cannot be depended on to provide a safe and secure environment."
The Republican dominated congressional committee had also heard testimony
from Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, former head of a US military team in Libya, who
corroborated Ambassador Stevens' assessment, by saying, "the security in
Benghazi was a struggle and remained a struggle throughout my time there". He
added that the head of US security in the region had pushed for more people "but
was never able to attain the numbers he felt comfortable with".
Shortly after the September 11th attack it was reported that the White House
proposed to cut $129 million from the allocation for "Embassy Security,
Construction, and Maintenance.” The cut can be seen on page 148 of the 394-page
sequestration report.
While acknowledging that Congress has the power of the purse, House Minority
leader Nancy Pelosi, excoriated slammed Republicans for not having a full
hearing on the subject and said Democrats held a hearing on how Medicare would
be affected by a theoretical Romney/Ryan budget without GOP participation.
Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton said that the State Department would
cooperate fully in the continuing congressional
investigation.
There'll be no truth coming from this regime. None. These corrosive, cancerous libs can't abide decency, truth, or facts. It's all about them and their power. I doubt these bastards have ever taken responsibility for anything they've done wrong.
Posted by: Skunkfeathers | October 15, 2012 at 09:24 AM
Just love how David Axelrod has been blaming the GOP for all of this. Is not the White House milking the Bin Laden raid (most recently with the Morgan Freeman-dubbed ad) for all they can get out of it?
Let's face it, Bin Laden was a depraved old man sitting around in Abbottabad watching porn.
Posted by: R.J. Godlewski | October 15, 2012 at 05:26 PM
and Axelrod wants in on Osama's 'virgins' (it's that "from them what has, to those what needs" nonsense). Must like camels...
Posted by: Skunkfeathers | October 15, 2012 at 05:47 PM
RJ,
For Bin Laden, "Porn" means "Animal planet".
Posted by: (Rhino!) CBPO Jon A Underwood, CBP, Ret. | October 16, 2012 at 12:13 AM
Snake Hunter Sez,
The Question Remains:
WHO Immediately Ordered UN Ambassador Susan Rice to LIE About The Lethal Bengazi Consulate Raid?
reb
http://www.lazyonebenn.blogspot.com
___ ___
Posted by: reb | October 17, 2012 at 10:47 PM