Frederick William Dame
Four Truths
***
TRUTH NUMBER ONE
Source: http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=160920
TRUTH NUMBER TWO
Here are ten reasons from the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama concerning why the person who calls himself Barack Hussein Obama is 100 percent pro-abortion. The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama has stated them and when the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA came up for a vote in the Illinois State Senate, the person calling himself Barack Hussein always voted NO, or PRESENT, which is the same as NO![1]
- Reason 10. Babies who survive abortions are not protected by the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
On March 31, 2001, the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama was the only opponent to speak on the NO position on the Illinois State Senate floor.
"I just want to suggest … that this is probably not going to survive constitutional scrutiny. Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a – child, a 9-month-old child that was delivered to term. …
I mean, it – it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional."
- Reason 9. A ban to stop aborted babies from being shelved to die would be burdensome to mothers.
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama stated on March 5, 2002,
"What we are doing here is to create (sic) one more burden on women, and I can’t support that."
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama then voted NO!
- Reason 8. Aborting babies alive and letting them die is a doctor’s prerogative.
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama is of the opinion that BAIPA included provisions that
“would have taken away from doctors their professional judgment when a fetus is viable.”
- Reason 7. Anyway, doctors don’t do that.
In an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times in October 2004, the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama said that he opposed BIAPA because
“physicians are already required to use life-saving measures when fetuses are born alive during abortions.”
- Reason 6. Obama apparently read medical charts and saw no proof.
In a speech at Benedictine University in October 2004, the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama said,
“there was no documentation that hospitals were actually doing what was alleged in testimony presented before (me) in committee, …” (quoted in the Illinois Leader.)
- Reason 5. Aborting babies alive and letting them die is a religious issue.
During his U.S. Senate contest against Obama, Alan Keyes famously said:
"Christ would not stand idly by while an infant child in that situation died. … Christ would not vote for Barack Obama, because Barack Obama has voted to behave in a way that it is inconceivable for Christ to have behaved."
To the dumbed-down public and to the enemedia, the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama has always mischaracterized Keyes’ condemnation. The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama maintains that Alan Keyes' opinion was a blanket statement against the pro-abortion position of the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama. This claim of the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama is not true. (Are you surprised?) Alan Keyes was emphatically discussing infanticide.
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama condones induced labor abortion that sometimes results in babies being aborted alive. Alan Keyes stated in a USA Today article opposite the editorial page (op. ed. article), that the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama responded,
"[W]e live in a pluralistic society, and … I can’t impose my religious views on another."
- Reason 4. Aborting babies alive and letting them die violates no universal principle.
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama said that the answer above was a
“typically liberal response”
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama continued,
"But my opponent’s accusations nagged at me. … If I am opposed to abortion for religious reasons but seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."
- Reason 3. Introducing legislation to stop live aborted babies from being shelved to die was a political maneuver.
During the speech at Benedictine University, the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama said,
“The bill was unnecessary in Illinois and was introduced for political reasons,” – (quoted in the Illinois Leader.)
- Reason 2. Sinking Born Alive was about outmaneuvering that political maneuver.
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama has a website. Found on that website was
"Pam Sutherland … of … Illinois Planned Parenthood … told ABC News, 'We worked with him specifically on his strategy. The Republicans were in control of the Illinois Senate at the time. They loved to hold votes on "partial birth" and "born alive." They put these bills out all the time … because they wanted to pigeonhole Democrats."
And the No. 1 reason why the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act was:
- Reason 1. Introducing Born Alive was a ploy to overturn Roe v. Wade.
The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama debated Alan Keyes in October 2004. The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama stated,
"Now, the bill that was put forward was essentially a way of getting around Roe vs. Wade. … At the federal level, there was a similar bill that passed because it had an amendment saying this does not encroach on Roe vs. Wade. I would have voted for that bill."
This is another lie, indeed two lies, coming from the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama. (Are you surprised?)
Lie Number One: the federal bill did not have an amendment to it. It had the following statement that allowed Liberal Democrats to vote for the bill:
"Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being born alive as defined in this section."
At that time Barbara Boxer (Senator, D-CA) was of the opinion that this included phrase did not attack the Supreme Court Ruling Roe v. Wade. On July 18, 2002, Harry Mason Reid (Senator, D-NV) said that the federal Bill should be unanimously approved. It was unanimously approved. When the state bill came up for a vote in the Illinois Senate later that year, the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama voted NO![2]
Lie Number Two: The definitions of born alive were always exactly the same. Only in the federal version was the final paragraph changed so that liberal Democrats could vote for the federal bill. However, as chairman of the Illinois Health and Human Services Committee that vetted the Illinois’ version in 2003, the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama refused to allow an amendment rendering both concluding paragraphs identical. The person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama also refused to call the bill for a vote, thus killing it. This killing of the bill is symbolical of the stance on unborn life and survived abortions that the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama propagandizes.
The person who calls himself Barrack Hussein Obama supported and still supports supported infanticide.[3]
TRUTH NUMBER THREE
“No laws can eliminate evil from the world—but that can’t be an excuse for inaction. Surely we can do better than this. If there is even one step we can take then we have an obligation to try. In the coming weeks I will use whatever power this office holds in an effort to prevent more tragedies like this. …This is our first job, caring for our children. That’s how as a society we will be judged. Are we really doing enough to keep our children safe from harm? …Can we honestly say that we’re doing enough to keep our children, all of them, safe from harm? If we’re honest with ourselves, the answer’s no. We’re not doing enough, and we will have to change. …Are we really prepared to say that we’re powerless in the face of such carnage, that the politics are too hard? Are we prepared to say that such violence visited on our children year after year after year is somehow the price of our freedom? We will have to change. If there is even one step we can take to save another child, or another parent, or another town, from the grief… then surely we have an obligation to try."[4] (Speech With False Tears in Newport, Connecticut on December 16, 2012)
TRUTH NUMBER FOUR
Never let a crisis go to waste, and if there is no crisis, create one.
All of the above prove that the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama is a
HYPOCRITE!
Frederick William Dame
Patriotic, Steadfast, and True
December 20, 2012.
[1] In this essay the author uses the phrase the person calling himself Barack Hussein Obama because there is no proof that Barack Hussein Obama is his real name. It is as if he was born without a name, which is also another way of not existing legally.
[2] http://www.creators.com/opinion/terence-jeffrey/obama-is-the-most-pro-abortion-candidate-ever.html.
[3] Adapted and quoted from: http://www.wnd.com/2008/01/45553/#QwFC9br4iofIAgG8.99 See also http://pennance.us/?p=60.
(Originally posted at The Obama Timeline here http://www.colony14.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/fourtruths.pdf )
Comments