June 30, 2009

America’s Tripwire: the Coming Revolution in Rational Politics

America’s Tripwire: the Coming Revolution in Rational Politics

By R.J. Godlewski
© June 30, 2009, All Rights Reserved.
(Right Truth Exclusive)


    Every revolution has, at its heart, a tripwire that might seem inconsequential to the events that will ultimately transpire on its merits. No one could adequately understand, for instance, the death and destruction that resulted from the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. Nor would anyone believe that the protests currently expressed in Iran have anything to do with the failure of a single political candidate. Yet, each of the above events will forever be linked to the initiator regardless of the underlying stress on the respective culture that ultimately caused the crisis.

    America, in the midst of 2009, is riding atop another bubble of societal dissatisfaction, aided in no small part to the grandiose promises of an anointed opportunist. President Barack Obama’s ascendance from political obscurity had less to do with his promises of extraordinary change than the growing resentment of a society on the verge of chucking out its national leadership en masse. President Obama did not win, the ruling class merely lost.

    The United States has always been a boiling stew led by the froth of turmoil. The more that our national leadership becomes corrupt, the more the underlying recipe becomes putrid and indigestible. Like a hardening crust on an otherwise magnificent soufflé, our nation has unwittingly elected the worst possible government during a period of great economic expectation. With the likes of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and now, apparently, Al Franken at the helm, the pot is primed to boil over. Perhaps even detonated.

    As our culture of death, entitlement, government control, and rampant spending festers, the final spark for revolution may be quite unobservable to the untrained eye but it exists nevertheless. For the past one hundred years, Americans have quietly endured the erosion of personal liberties and economic success. We have endured these transgressions because natural evolution of our economy always kept pace with the overindulgence of our national leadership. Unfortunately, however, our present government has exceeded this equilibrium to unsustainable levels.

    With the ‘Guerrilla Government’ takeover of the banking, auto, energy, and, soon, heath industries, the average American will come to realize what large segments of the global population had already learned long ago: government programs invariably fail. It is the private individual who inspires evolution, not bureaucracy.

    What has kept America safe and secure for two hundred and thirty-odd years has been that we remain – and will continue to remain – an armed population. This silent undertow has propelled the United States as the world’s vanguard against tyranny and it is this reality that will keep the country safe and secure from those who have repeatedly overstepped their Constitutional boundaries. With the election of Barack Obama, this safeguard has been accelerating at a phenomenal rate as thousands of men and women assail their local gun shops to purchase firearms and ammunition in historical quantities.

    With 300+ million firearms already in America before President Obama’s election, it would not have taken a large change to drastically tip the balance beyond even Hitler-esque confiscation. The fear on the street is that President Obama understands that messing with firearm ownership would be political suicide so he will have to resort to taxing ammunition to effect his progressive anti-gun legislation. This too, however, can be considered political suicide for many of his votes came from otherwise gun-toting Democrats.

    Every significant culture has gone through both a civil war and suffered under the prospects of a tyranny. America had endured a bloody Civil War, but it had never experienced allegiance to a tyrant since its founding. We have fought them and most of us know to prefer freedom to government, but a direct tyranny is something that we have never witnessed while under our flag. Until now…

    With each takeover of a capital enterprise, those presently infesting our government take an oath of treason. With each new tax raised upon us citizens, their allegiance to George III of old is reaffirmed. Their desire is for absolute government control of our lives without due representation and their insistence upon taxing us into oblivion is merely the energy source for the coming revolution. It is not the blasting cap for change, however. That comes when President Obama and his dominant progressive legislation acts on imposing further gun laws upon a skeptical populace.

    Progressives understand this. They want this. They want to tip America into full-scale revolt. This is what treason is – destroying the very fabric of a society for personal gain. Nowhere is this more evident than through a brief rummage of history’s refuse pile. The progressives in Washington have convinced you that they need to spend trillions to jumpstart an otherwise cyclic economy. They have convinced you that businesses, corrupt as they are, are simply “too big to fail”. The more that the progressives find excuses for their extravagances, the more they will try to convince you that the “crisis” in question mandates another trillion or, at a minimum, another czar. Leave it to our government to equate itself with a failed monarchy.

    The Great Progressive Spin Machine, riding on the current of post-Clinton gun control defeats, is now salivating over the neighboring crisis in Mexico as their prime opportunity to enact restrictive measures on law-abiding patriots. Our Constitution guarantees that each of us is permitted to keep and bear firearms (including ammunition) for self-protection, subsistence, and entertainment, yet over the past one hundred years we have allowed them to subjugate these very rights under the guise of “reasonable” gun laws. The problem is, there is NO reasonable interpretation of the Constitution that sacrifices an inalienable right in the process.

    We the people of the United States remain more powerful than the President, the Congress, and the Supreme Court combined. They are our limbs, not our brains. They represent our servants, not we their slaves. Police and federal agencies are bound by the Constitution. We are empowered by it. The stresses underlying our society are sufficiently powerful enough to topple one or more political parties and, quite possibly, the very nature of our Washington leadership. We are resilient and permissive, but the cracks enforced by the Obama Administration’s unconstitutional threats upon our culture have laid the foundation for serious change beyond even that envisioned by his campaign promises. Gun ownership may very well represent the tripwire that detonates society’s “claymore” of wholesale activism. It may represent that final line in the sand that distinguishes citizens from inhabitants. 
   

June 16, 2009

Iran does not allow assault rifles.

Iran does not allow assault rifles.

By R.J. Godlewski
© June 16, 2009, All Rights Reserved.
(Right Truth Exclusive)

IranElections

  
Iran photos received by email from Dr. Paul Williams www.thelastcrusade.org.

“It’s nuts for ordinary citizens to go out and buy assault weapons. Assault weapons are difficult to operate, they jam easily. If you want a gun to protect your home, it’s the last thing you should have…If you have an assault weapon to protect your house, you’re crazy..they’re not very effective.” --Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell quoted in America’s Freedom, July, 2009.


    Governor Rendell is an idiot. Plain and simple. If “assault weapons” are sufficient to protect nuclear plants, Army barracks, and convoys, then they are most assuredly capable of defending our homes. What makes Governor Rendell equal to the mullahs in Iran, in my opinion, is not that he apparently knows very little about weaponology, but that he knows even less about American history and our Constitutional rights.

    We do not need the premise of “home protection” to qualify our purchases of assault rifles. We can purchase them for whatever reason we so choose. My AKMS (a folding stock AK-47 – considered a “pistol” here in Michigan) can and does protect my domicile. But that’s not the only reason that I purchased it. I purchased it because it consists largely of Polish parts and therefore represents something of a proud family heritage. I also purchased it because it aids me in studying Middle East firearms and, well, fully auto AKs are just too damn expensive to acquire. Mostly, however, I purchased my AK because they are just so much damn fun to shoot. Need I any further excuse?

    Governor Rendell’s idiotic statement that they “are difficult to operate” and “jam easily” completely ignores recent global history. Millions of child soldiers around the planet use them every day. Many of these weapons can be buried into the sand, mud, snow – what have you – for months and come out fighting. Apparently, Governor Rendell’s mind fluctuates too rapidly back to the early days of the Vietnam War when the then new M-16 was rushed into service. He is obviously an opponent to American industrial capability and innovation.

    However, I suspect that his reaction to “assault rifles” stems from the progressive

45_AK_270_300WM_3006_Cartridges

liberal hatred of ALL guns and they try to push semi-automatic weapons across as some form of demonic “killing machine”. Fortunately, you have yours truly here to set you straight.

    In the image above, you will see a .45 ACP pistol cartridge pulled from my Taurus 24/7 OSS, my personal “concealed carry” weapon of choice. Next to that is a 7.62x39mm round from my AKMS. Next to that, is a .270 rifle cartridge, a .300 Winchester Magnum, and everyone’s favorite deer cartridge, the .30-06.  Notice how “tiny” the AK-47 round appears?


    Naturally, everyone says that an AK-47 with a thirty round magazine can unleash a “hail of bullets” but so could I with any of the above options. The .45 is good out to about 25 yards, the 7.62 to about 400 yards, and with the .300 and .30-06 rounds I can take down a man-sized object out to 1,200 yards. For those of you fairly new to the realm of firearms and ammunition, the 7.62 (which is an intermediate round and slightly shorter than the NATO 7.62x51mm cartridge), the .300 Winchester Magnum, and the ubiquitous .30-06 all possess the same basic bullet diameter. There is just more oomph with the full rifle cartridges whose bullets are also a bit longer.

    Well, there you have it. The mystique of the infamous “assault weapon” round demystified as nothing more than a military’s decision to fabricate something between a pistol cartridge and one belonging to a rifle. Its entry into the world of firearms technology brought about simply because soldiers after World War II got tired – literally – of lugging around twenty-pound rifles all day. Everything else that makes “assault rifles” so scary to most citizens is simply their use of modern materials and designs. You know, the same thing that makes your Buick Rendezvous so “scary” when compared to a 1928 Model A Ford.

    Bans on assault rifles are nothing more than a prelude to bans on all types of firearms. Subsequently, bans on all firearms lead directly – and inevitably – to the kind of chaos that we are witnessing in Iran today. A nation in flames because ruling despots have decided to fabricate an election to appease the world and to highlight the mastery of their self-appointed messiah.

    A pathetic wimp like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would probably last a day or two at the most in charge of a free nation such as the United States and do not believe for an instant that it is not our country’s 300+ million guns that keep us free from tyranny. This is the primary reason that our founding fathers gave us the “right to keep and bear arms” – to keep fanatics such as the mullahs from ever taking control of our rights.

    Our freedoms and liberties hailed from a “shot heard around the world” not some weak “round of diplomacy heard around the block”. The one thing that Hitler, Mussolini, and every other tyrant wannabe had in common is that the first action they took was to remove guns from the hands of their citizens. Thus disarmed, anyone could come into power.

    When Governor Rendell spoke his stupidity, he immediately acknowledged two key points. First, he does not want a nation free enough in which the likes of him could be removed from power should they overstep their legislative boundaries. Secondly, Governor Rendell announced his opinion that all of you are just too damn stupid to know better.

    The power of the vote is useless without the backing of an armed and free population.  Take a look at those photographs from Iran again. How much do you believe that the Iranian people would have loved to own firearms to keep the mullahs and Ahmadinejad at bay? When you go to bed tonight, say a prayer of thanks to God that your safety and survival are in the hands of your neighbors who know that our right to own firearms – any firearm – upholds your freedoms more than tyrannical politicians such as Governor Rendell. They are the ones “crazy” enough to be a threat upon your life…



June 05, 2009

Tennessee Gun Laws and State Rights

Tennessee  passed a new law that permits handgun carry permit holders to take their weapons into all eating and drinking establishments in the state, although they will not be allowed to drink if armed.    (The TennesseanWay to go Tennessee, my lovely State.  State legislators voted to override the governor who vetoed the bill

Tennessee also has a new law under consideration that would say if firearms are manufactured and sold inside the state of Tennessee, federal gun law would not apply -- Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act .  (WZTV.comMontana passed a similar bill earlier this year.  It's a matter of State rights.


The legislation that takes effect July 14 retains an existing ban on consuming alcohol while carrying a handgun, and restaurant owners can still opt to ban weapons from their establishments.

Thirty-seven other states have similar laws.  [snip]

Read HB0962 at: http://www.capitol.tn.gov   (AP)

The federal government isn't going to like states passing laws to by-pass them on guns.  I see a battle brewing and I also see more states passing similar laws.

Gun buyers are stocking up on weapons, and ammunition is in short supply.

"It is a very significant fear for a lot of Tennesseans," says John Harris, Executive Director of the Tennessee Firearms Association

Harris says gun owners are worried. They believe the Federal government may soon restrict certain weapons.  [snip]

But if the law passes, it will put the state at odds with the federal government, and set the stage for a showdown over guns.

Both the House and Senate versions of this bill will be up for a committee vote tomorrow.

Many believe this issue may ultimately be settled by the United State Supreme Court.


June 01, 2009

Political "S"elections

I received an email on the Iranian elections where the author referred to them as selections rather than elections, since candidates are screened and must meet all the requirements "Only criminals who have moved up the Islamic Republics ranks by murder, rape and torture of the innocent Iranians and have proven themselves loyal to Islamic republic are allowed to run for office."  Closer to home here in the United States I think the same title applies -- we have selections rather than elections.  We the people really don't get to decide who will represent us, because long before we think about going to the voting booth those working behind the curtain have already selected the candidates for us.

One of Rush Limbaugh's listeners called in wondering when a true Conservative candidate would come to light, suggesting that we the people raise such a candidate up.  How do we, Conservatives, do that?    Does anyone think Barack Obama could have risen to President of the United States on his own?  We could ask that question about many previous leaders.  From the time Obama entered college he was supported, tutored, directed toward the office he now holds.  Look back, as we did during the campaign, at those in Obama's life who surrounded him, who had influence on him both physical, emotional, political and most importantly financially.

So, can Conservatives take a lesson from the rise of Obama?  I think we can.  In the last election we had John McCain pushed down our throats.  The many Republicans who ran in the primary elections really did not give Conservatives a true choice, divided the votes, and gave us McCain.  We do not want to be in that position again.  Stuck with a RINO (Republican In Name Only), who is more like a Democrat than Republican, and certainly not a Conservative.

It's never too early to start thinking about the next election.  If we had to vote today, who would our choice be for our Senators, Congressmen, and new President?  Have any ideas?  We need to seriously think about this and start working, supporting, financing, those people who truly believe the way we do.  Getting in true Conservatives on the ground level of politics, supporting them through each office they hold no matter how many years it takes.

Depressed yet?  But wait!  There is serious talk about another party, a third party, but we already have third, forth, fifth, ... parties.  Where has that gotten them or us?  Nowhere.  The Left and Democrats like to point out that the Republicans are divided, yes and the Conservatives are not exactly together either.  We have The Constitution Party, The American Conservative PartyThe Conservative Party US,
Libertarian Party , Constitution Party , Green Party , America's Independent Party A quick visit to Wikipdeia (which may or may not be complete or accurate) provides a full page of smaller less-known US political parties and groups.  Then there are many sub-groups, just look on FaceBook or other networking sites and see the hundreds of supposedly Conservative groups.  We are organized into so many sub-groups it's both pathetic and encouraging at the same time.

What's the answer?  It takes work, money, notoriety, publicity, and a platform that people agree with to get elected.   We live in a media era when a political career can be ruined with one misstatement;   where a candidate comes from, what kind of accent they have, the type of family life they lead, and how easily they can be smeared seem more important than what they stand for.  Think Sarah Palin...

Honestly I do not have an answer to US selections.  If we had to vote for the next President, and we could vote for anyone qualified, .. I do not know who I would vote for.  I do know that my Iranian friend's statement about selections in that country could be applied to the US.  I know it was true for the 2009 election:  Only criminals those who have moved up the Islamic Republics  party ranks by murder, rape and torture of the innocent Iranians towing the party line or towing the opposition's line, and have proven themselves loyal to Islamic republic the party or useful to the party, and are propped up by the MSM, are allowed to run for be elected to office.  Make that selected to office.  Heaven help us.


May 30, 2009

How Free is Your State?

 

Mercatus Center of George Mason University has released a study:  Freedom in the 50 States: An Index of Personal and Economic Freedom, which shows some very interesting, but not surprising, results.    You will notice that Tennessee, my lovely state, is ranked number 8 of the most free states.  You can download the full document in pdf here.

Below are listed the States from most to least free according to your current weights. Shown above is a map representing the ranking by color: States change from blue to green to yellow as their ranking increases (they become "more free").
New Hampshire0.361
Colorado0.352
South Dakota0.322
Idaho0.297
Texas0.294
Missouri0.269
Tennessee0.238
Virginia0.235
Arizona0.227
North Dakota0.220
Utah0.209
Kansas0.183
Indiana0.174
Michigan0.171
Wyoming0.152
Iowa0.148
Georgia0.128
Oklahoma0.126
Montana0.094
Pennsylvania0.084
Alabama0.078
Florida0.051
North Carolina0.016
Delaware-0.004
Nevada-0.004
Mississippi-0.005
Oregon-0.007
Nebraska-0.015
Arkansas-0.021
South Carolina-0.033
Alaska-0.052
Kentucky-0.068
West Virginia-0.080
Louisiana-0.088
Minnesota-0.089
New Mexico-0.122
Wisconsin-0.167
Ohio-0.172
Connecticut-0.180
Maine-0.180
Vermont-0.181
Illinois-0.197
Massachusetts-0.198
Washington-0.226
Hawaii-0.261
Maryland-0.341
California-0.343
Rhode Island-0.377
New Jersey-0.380
New York-0.639

Freedom in the 50 States This paper presents the first-ever comprehensive ranking of the American states on their public policies affecting individual freedoms in the economic, social, and personal spheres. We develop and justify our ratings and aggregation procedure on explicitly normative criteria, defining individual freedom as the ability to dispose of one’s own life, liberty, and justly acquired property however one sees fit, so long as one does not coercively infringe on another individual’s ability to do the same.

This study improves on prior attempts to score economic freedom for American states in three primary ways: (1) it includes measures of social and personal freedoms such as peaceable citizens’ rights to educate their own children, own and carry firearms, and be free from unreasonable search and seizure; (2) it includes far more variables, even on economic policies alone, than prior studies, and there are no missing data on any variable; and (3) it uses new, more accurate measurements of key variables, particularly state fiscal policies.

We find that the freest states in the country are New Hampshire, Colorado, and South Dakota, which together achieve a virtual tie for first place. All three states feature low taxes and government spending and middling levels of regulation and paternalism. New York is the least free by a considerable margin, followed by New Jersey, Rhode Island, California, and Maryland. On personal freedom alone, Alaska is the clear winner, while Maryland brings up the rear. As for freedom in the different regions of the country, the Mountain and West North Central regions are the freest overall while the Middle Atlantic lags far behind on both economic and personal freedom. Regression analysis demonstrates that states enjoying more economic and personal freedom tend to attract substantially higher rates of internal net migration.

The data used to create the rankings are publicly available online at www.statepolicyindex.com, and we invite others to adopt their own weights to see how the overall state freedom rankings change.

Be sure to check out the independent site that allows you to create personalized freedom rankings from their data by moving sliders to weight the policies differently.

Note the locations on the map above of free vs not free states, which should remind us all that should states want to break away from this new socialist administration, it would be very difficult to form a new union with like-minded states and have any continuity of borders.  Just a thought.



May 26, 2009

Take your guns everywhere!!!

I carry my personal weapon everywhere I go.  Everywhere.  Better to be alive, tried by 12 than carried by six.  Having said that, I got into a discussion with a friend about a Tennessee bill that would allow gun owners to take their personal weapons into a "bar".  Actually the bill would allow gun owners to take their weapons into any establishment that serves alcoholic beverages, including restaurants like Applebees, The Olive Garden, or The Outback.  When people read about this bill, as my friend did,  they immediately think about some sleazy, dark bar with drunken degenerates hanging over the bar inebriated to the point of almost unconsciousness, waving a loaded gun around at others.  What's wrong with this image?  Plenty.

I tried to explain to my friend that an American's right to own and carry firearms is a constitutional right, also an individual's right provided by the concealed carry permit issued by the State in which they live.  To forbid these honest Americans from carrying their personal protection is to favor the bad guys over the law-abiding citizens.  The bad guys will have illegal guns wherever they want to take them, don't have any doubt about this.

Here's another instance, Senate Bill 730 would allow employees to bring guns onto their employers' property, as long as they are kept in their cars, even if the business prohibits doing so.  

Allowing employees to carry firearms onto their employers' property invites someone to assume the responsibility of law enforcement. No matter how dire the situation, the last thing the brave men and women of the law enforcement community need is having to determine the perpetrator from the Lone Ranger.

Guns have a place in our society, but the workplace is not one of them. (Statesman.com)

No. NO NO NO NO.... Wrong!  The workplace, and school and the grocery store, and church, and everywhere the average American citizen goes ... is the VERY place you need a gun.  What good is a personal weapon if you have to leave it in your car?  A bad guy doesn't care where he attacks and no matter where the threat is, you need to be able to defend, not only yourself, but those who are not armed and who cannot defend themselves.

Remember the Virginia State shooting?  If these students had been allowed to carry their own personal, legal, firearms to school, this shooter would have been taken down immediately and many lives would have been saved.

I think it is stupid that Americans can be approved for a concealed carry permit, and at the same time be told "you have permission to carry, but you can't carry at a school, at your employment, at a place that serves any alcoholic beverages, ..."  That's just wrong folks. 

It's your life, the life of your family, friends, co-workers, fellow students, and yes ... fellow restaurant patrons.

No one will ever know you have a weapon on you, ... unless you have to draw it to protect yourself!

May 20, 2009

Victory for gun owners


800px-Ruger_P89_3 Gun rights advocates are poised to win an unexpected victory under Obama and an overwhelmingly liberal Democrat Congress that they were unable win under President Bush --  a provision allowing visitors to national parks and refuges to carry loaded and concealed weapons.

How can this be?  Simple: In a similar way that those pesky hoards of advertisements seem to get slipped into the envelope with your credit card bill, some clever underdog Republicans slipped in a pro-gun measure to the Credit Card reform Bill before Congress.

From the New York Times:  Advocates of Gun Rights Are Poised for a Victory

To the frustration and discouragement of many Democrats, House and Senate lawmakers and aides say it now appears likely that President Obama will this week sign into law a provision allowing visitors to national parks and refuges to carry loaded and concealed weapons.

The White House is lukewarm at best on the gun provision, which was added to a popular measure imposing new rules on credit card companies. But the Democrats who now control both Congress and the White House appear ready to allow it to survive rather than derail a consumer-friendly credit card measure that Mr. Obama is eager to sign as Congress heads off for a Memorial Day recess.

“Timing is everything in politics,” said Senator TomTypePad - Compose New Post Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma and the champion of the gun proposal.


I say kudos to Senator Coburn and "sauce for the goose" to the Democrats.

May 13, 2009

Conservatives Under Attack

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
     --Voltaire


In the past, the above quote seemed to be one of the foundations of American life -- but that is quickly changing.  Many groups inside the US want to control the speech of Conservative Americans.  In the case sited below,
the individuals investigated were 'outraged that the policy could be used to launch long-term investigations of conservatives simply for articulating conservative principles. And they knew the policy could be used to create a chilling effect on constitutionally protected expression. '

In April of 2007, two groups at Michigan State University (MSU) decided to host a speech on illegal immigration. The speech was disrupted by radicals. Some arrests were made. As a result, some protesters decided to retaliate by going to the MSU Office for Inclusion. They claimed to have been harassed in violation of the MSU anti-discrimination policy.

The Office for Inclusion then decided to launch a six-month investigation of all members of the two groups who invited the speaker. They also decided to investigate the two faculty advisers. This was despite the school’s claim that its anti-discrimination policy was not meant to trump free speech.  (Mike Adams, Family Security Matters)



"I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left."
     -- Margaret Thatcher


"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."
     --Thomas Jefferson


From attacks on freedom of speech we move to attacks on the second amendment and our right to own weapons.

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of the original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government."
     --Alexander Hamilton

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."   --Alexander Hamilton

"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue when the law-abiding(are) deprived the use of them."
     --Thomas Paine



2A For the USA (Second Amendment for the USA) is a movie in several parts posted below, by Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.  Watch the videos, forward them or this link to your friends, family, enemies, Democrats, Republicans, whatever.

Part I
.

.

Part II
.

.

Part III
.

.

More quotes at TOTUS Blog.


May 08, 2009

Montana vs Federal Government on Guns -- Wins

Montana Defies Feds on Guns, Ammo, Silencers and Other Accessories

Now the Democratic governor of Montana has signed into law an incredible attempt to erode the power of the Federal Government as it applies to gun laws. Let me just lay it out from the bill:

A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce... 


What this functionally means is that items that the federal government loves to regulate and prohibit: handguns, silencers, ammunition, scopes and so on - would be perfectly legal in Montana and exempt from requirements to engage the Federal framework of registration.

Montana’s argument is sound - those items which are made in Montana for use in Montana are not being involved in “interstate commerce.” That small clause of the constitution which lies at the heart of many federal laws, including drug laws, alcohol laws, transportation laws and firearms laws among other things is being directly challenged by this legislation.  (continue at Zeal For Truth)


I love it.  Other states should follow Montana's lead.  A commenter at Zeal For Truth, Glen California, provides this:

I did some research and found  that Utah, Texas, Arkansas, and several others are pondering the same thing. This is amazing. If successful, it could reverse all the BS that has been happening for years. Imagine that States Rights


How will the federal government react?

Can this type action be used for things other than guns?  What about California marijuana, grown and smoked inside California???

Read the full Bill at ATV, where I found this:

Discussion – Let us see what Obama does. If he hits Montana hard they will probably vote to secede from the USA. The governor of Texas has already been refusing Federal money because he does not want to agree to the conditions that go with it and he has been saying secession is a right they have as sort of a threat. Things are no longer the same with the USA. Do not be deceived by Obama acting as if all is the same, it is not.




For some find reading, check out the following winning articles from the Watcher of Weasels Council:

Predators, Prey and Pelosi: A Weasel Watching Perspective

Congratulations go out to all the winning entries. Remember, keep your head up, your eyes wide open and your keyboards clicking. Please share these great articles with all your fans!!

Winning Council Submissions

Winning Non-Council Submissions




May 05, 2009

I, Militia - An individual's guide to protecting our nation from Tyranny

I, Militia

An individual's guide to protecting our nation from Tyranny

Imilitia2

PART TWO

Does Patriotism require defense of the state or of the nation?

Warfare is the greatest affair of the state, the basis of life and death, the Way [Tao] to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed” Sun-tzu (Sawyer 1993, 157).

There is only one law recognized in warfare: winning at all costs. Nothing else matters. When engaged within battle, the gloves come off and you fight like hell until the enemy no longer exists. Strangely, however, for a nation that has been at war far longer than it
has remained in peace, the United States seems to prefer dwelling upon civilized approaches to international disputes as if Western sportsmanship transcends to the field of battle. 

Modern asymmetrical warfare
requires the complete integration of intelligence, command, and tactical application into a singular operation (Balor 1988, 244). While our military is first-rate and the best the world has ever witnessed, our national leadership is often last in decisiveness and our intelligence gathering mediocre because of this.

Let us focus, for a moment, on our intelligence operations – specifically that involving the Central Intelligence Agency.

Agency leadership, historically,
has always centered upon liberal activists that viewed Republicans as “dull, earnest, and Midwestern” (Thomas 2006, 101). In other words, those who gave birth to the Agency and structured its foundation tended to look down upon those who did not fit the Georgetown social cache of “well-to-do liberal Democrats” who formed “a kind of elite within the elite” and who “took care of their own” (Thomas 2006, 99). Perhaps this is why today’s CIA could not fight the Taliban in Afghanistan without employing one hundred pounds of Starbucks coffee in the process (Schroen 2007, 220).

When Sun-tzu wrote that warfare
“must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed”, I doubt very much that he meant sitting around Langley or perhaps the ultrasecret Moscow Hall of the Defense Intelligence Agency passing out jove while Muslim fanatics dreamt of beheading innocent women and children. To the contrary, he wrote “Thus the army values being victorious; it does not value prolonged warfare”(Sawyer 1993, 160) hinting at the decisiveness and expediency of the effective battlefield commander.

With the Obama Administration’s recent decision to close Gitmo and its on again/off again stance regarding prosecuting those who waterboarded terrorists, the vast American divide between intelligence collection and tactical action will only intensify.

Washington versus America

If we have spent untold billions developing a logistics capability able to send Starbucks coffee to one of the remotest plots of real estate on the planet but restrain ourselves from spending a buck (what I pay through Cabelas) on a single bullet that could
alleviate the world from having to send yet another terrorist down to that “dreadful Gitmo”, then we have a serious problem in national leadership.

If we could focus just one-tenth
the energy that Progressive Liberals spend on demonizing law-abiding gun owners against the terrorists, the Islamists would quickly discover that
seventy-seven virgins just ain’t worth the effort. Instead, we allow ourselves to become distracted from the need to win the war against terrorists.

At this point, I would like to make three basic assumptions: 

(1) The average American citizen trusts their elected officials too damn much;

(2) The average American citizen
believes that the federal government’s primary purpose is to protect the country and its citizens;

(3) The average elected official in Washington sees their job as basically one of protecting their status quo.


Taken together – as they
invariably come – these three assumptions of mine explain why we’re in such a mess today. So how do we change this situation? Glad that you
asked.

(continue reading below the fold)

Continue reading "I, Militia - An individual's guide to protecting our nation from Tyranny" »

April 18, 2009

The Left Is Making a Mistake in Ridiculing the Tea Parties

The Left Is Making a Mistake in Ridiculing the Tea Parties

By Frank Salvato

(posted at the author's request)

 

The political Left in the United States is making a grave mistake in diminishing and dismissing the anger of the American people. Where it may be common place for liberals, Leftists, neo-Marxists and Progressive-Leftists to take to the streets over anything and everything, including a change of wind direction, it is entirely a different story with conservatives and Republicans. Conservatives and Republicans don’t march in the streets for anything. The fact that they have now taken to the streets in protest of massive government spending and government’s encroachment into our liberties speaks volumes to those who would listen.

 

“Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!”

An amazing thing happened on the way to America’s socialistic demise...a revolution has fomented. Born of a righteous anger centered on wasteful and special interest government spending, lack of honest representation in government, a move toward transforming the United States Constitutional Republic into a Socialist Democracy, excessive taxation and many more constitutionally based grievances, conservatives, traditionalists and Republicans, as well as centrists, independents and Democrats, took to the streets of just about every congressional district to protest a behemoth runaway government run by an elitist and opportunistic political class. From Chicago to New York, St. Louis to San Francisco, St. Paul to Austin and Miami to Portland, hard-working, taxpaying Americans, who aren’t too often moved to taking to the streets in protest, took to the streets to redress their government.

 

What makes this “protest” more important and more potent than any petition drive, any email, letter writing or phone campaign, is that it moved conservatives, traditionalists and Republicans to take to the streets, something that in most every instance and in every circumstance they are not wont to do. The question that is being asked now is this: Will this movement grow and gather strength enough to affect real, meaningful and constitutionally friendly “change” or will conservatives, traditionalists and Republicans fall prey to their traditional boogey-man, factionalism?

 

The Conservative Challenge

For decades– both in my political life and for as long as I have been writing and publishing – I have contended that conservatives and Republicans – the Right – aren’t cohesive. Since entering into the new media publishing and non-profit educational venues I have come to understand that they don’t financially support the organizations and publications that carry the water for them; who defend the traditionalist ideology from mainstream media and Leftist attacks. They employ ideological litmus tests for their prospective candidates instead of selecting candidates that would dedicate their public service to preserving their individual rights to pursue their special interests. And it is obvious to anyone but those walking around with eyes wide shut that it takes an act outrageous and egregious to motivate conservatives and Republicans to the streets in protest.

 

While this analysis may sound harsh (and with regard to the lack of financial support for those who carry the water for conservatism it is meant to be), for the most part there is an underlying philosophical reason for the differences between the pack mentality of the Left and the individualism of the Right. Where the Left leans more toward identifying our populace in the collective (what’s good for the country is good for the individual), the Right identifies our populace as individuals who, together, make up the whole (what is good for the individual is good for the country). This individualist philosophy lends itself to self-sufficiency and individual responsibility which leads to a community of people who believe that solutions come from individuals and not government. This, of course, leads to a civically responsible community.

 

A vulnerability that exists in extreme individualism is that it leads to a community of individuals who always want to be the leader. We’ve all heard the phrase, “Too many chiefs and not enough Indians.” When everyone believes that their way of achieving things is the best, factions develop that impede the whole of the community from being effective in achieving common goals.

 

A prime example of this can be found in the ideological litmus test for political candidates. Instead of supporting candidates that would fight to protect an individual’s right to pursue matters important to the individual, factions within the conservative community threaten to withhold support if their individual special interests, the subjects and issues most important to them, are not embraced by candidates. Using the individualist philosophy in political pursuits instead of measuring candidates on their dedication to preserving and defending the individuals’ rights to pursue their individual interests makes it next to impossible to not only come to a consensus on a candidate, but slate a candidate that can beat the Left’s cohesive, pack-mentality voting style.

 

Extreme individualism is also the main reason that the Right continually falls to the Left in establishing and funding political action and advocacy groups. It is the primary reason why, even though there are people on the right side of the ideological aisle who have even more money than neo-Marxist financier George Soros, there are no groups like MoveOn.org, America Coming Together, Media Matters, etc. Those ideological groups that do exist on the right side of the ideological aisle are almost always extremely limited in what they can do to combat the Leftists because they are so underfunded.

 

This is why the events of April 15th, 2009, are so incredible and important in and of themselves. It would seem that the acts outrageous and egregious have occurred at the hand of our government, so much so and for so long that – to borrow a line from a Bob Dylan song, “...the times, they are a changin’.”

 

The Beneficiaries of American Political Apathy

The American Fifth Column – an association of one-worlders, neo-Marxists, Progressive-Leftists, Communists, Socialists and anarchists, to name some of the more notable groups – has successfully intruded into our daily lives by implementing a shadow set of societal laws in “political correctness”; a shadow set of rules antithetical to the United States Constitution. This is true to such an extent that elected officials are basing the creation of legislation on these tenets, tenets directly taken from the Marxist-Leninist philosophy. From hate crime laws whose definitions are open to ideological interpretation to the mass redistribution of wealth currently being perpetrated upon the American people by the Obama Administration to the government funded indoctrination of our children into special interest ideology via the public schools system, the elements of our society that believe government is the answer have infiltrated every avenue of our lives and they have placed the importance of their ideology above even the proper execution of representative government.

 

But most disturbing is that the American Fifth Column has so successfully employed the tactics of Marxist “community organizer” Saul Alinsky  to achieve their goal – the radical transformation of America's social and economic structure – that they have taken control of the US government. Nancy Pelosi’s oligarchy in the US House of Representatives, combined with the almost filibuster-proof Democrat majority in the US Senate, place the Legislative Branch firmly in control of the neo-Marxist wing of the Democrat Party. President Obama – who has talked unabashedly about “economic justice” and the “arrogance” of the United States and who is a self-declared “community organizer” in the mold of the Alinsky model – has populated his administration with far-Left ideologues – many from the Clinton Administration – including many members of the biased and agendized mainstream media.

 

It can be successfully argued that the neo-Marxist Progressive-Left has become “the establishment” and traditionalist Americans – those who believe in the sanctity of the US Constitution, in freedom, liberty and personal and civic responsibility – have become the “counter-culture.”

 

Enter the tea parties...

 

Goebbels Would Be Proud
As real, hard-working Americans from all walks of life – rich, poor, religious, non-religious, Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Independent, white, black, yellow, brown, male and female – took to the streets to send a message to their elected officials; those elected to office to represent the best interests of their constituencies, not their political parties, perhaps the most organized and vicious threat to our Constitutional Republic took to the airwaves to discredit, diminish and otherwise smear We the People: the mainstream media.

 

Make no mistake, while the neo-Marxists elected to office are a threat to our liberty and freedom, to our Constitutional Republic, they wouldn’t be able to come close to the success they have seen so far if it weren’t for the propagandists in the mainstream media. The mainstream media disingenuously and blatantly violated their constitutionally mandated responsibility to act as citizen’s advocate by championing the Obama campaign in the 2008 elections. By refusing to ask the tough questions and selectively airing favorable coverage of the Obama campaign, while criticizing the McCain campaign for even the most benign faux pas, they ensured a victory for Barack Obama thus violating the public trust. True journalism is dead in the mainstream media. It has been replaced by a propaganda dissemination mechanism that would have made Nazi propaganda chief Josef Goebbels envious. With regard to the tea parties two examples stand out...

 

Radio talk show host, Bill Press, on FOX News, April 14th, tried to float the idea that nefarious conservative organizations were behind the organizing of the nationwide tea party assemblage, saying he ”didn’t see anything genuine or see anything real” about the protests. He advanced a ridiculous theory that because advocate organizations and politicians decided to get on board with the public outrage that they somehow were pulling the strings of the total of protesters from coast-to-coast. Press may understand protests on the Left to be funded by nefarious political and ideological forces – George Soros, MoveOn.org, America Coming Together, Media Matters, the Communist and Socialist Parties, etc. – but conservatives and Republicans aren’t that adept at organizing “march-in-the-street” protests.

 

Another came from CNN’s Susan Roesgen who displayed a level of elitism in her interviewing of tea party protesters in Chicago heretofore unseen throughout the history of journalism. Roesgen questioned one protester whose frustration with Barack Obama’s totalitarian governmental style led him to equate it to the political stylings of a young, pre-holocaust Adolf Hitler. Forgetting that fascism exists on the left side of an accurate political spectrum, Roesgen chastised the protester for being “offensive.” One must question how offended she was when the same thing was happening to President George W. Bush. Then Roesgen, under the guise of asking a question, lectured and entered into debate with another protester before cutting him off and declaring that the entire protest was orchestrated by FOX News and was, in fact, “anti-government,” “anti-CNN” and “not family viewing.”

 

This blatant disregard for the public’s genuine anger lends credence to the argument that the mainstream media is not only in the tank for the Obama Administration, but that they have reached such a level of elitism, possessing such an agenda-driven arrogance, that they have literally become not only an enemy of the Charters of Freedom but an enemy of the people.

 

Overthrowing Men Who Pervert the Constitution

According to the recently released DHS threat assessment titled, Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic & Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization & Recruitment, my proclivity to actively defend the US Constitution, to actively question a reckless government that has strayed from the principles set forth by our Founders and Framers – principles born of Natural Law and Judeo-Christian values, principles that forged a Constitutional Republic, defines me as a threat to our nation. According to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano (please tell me again what her qualifications for this post are?) because I am angry about the government’s abdication of effective representative government I am a threat to the nation, along with US soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan and each and every American who turned out for the tea parties across the nation. Both Napolitano and President Obama – for his silence on the matter – consider We the People “the enemy.”

 

As of this writing, there are 564 days until the 2010 midterm elections. The questions that remains are these:

 

Will this truly patriotic movement continue to grow?

Will those who took to the streets on April 15th, 2009, continue to do so until the totalitarian forces of the neo-Marxist Progressive-Left are vanquished once and for all?

 

Or will conservative, traditionalists, Republicans, concerned centrists and honest Democrats look at their singular achievement and say job well-done as they retreat to the status quo?

 

To be sure, if the mid-term elections had been held on the day of the tea parties I truly believe most incumbents would have been ousted from office. The anger is that concentrated. But the past holds the truth of the future and it shows that – traditionally – conservatives are hard pressed to maintain cohesiveness over a prolonged period of time. Truthfully, I hope I am proven wrong on this point. The fact is, our nation’s future depends on me being wrong.

 

After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto is credited with having said, "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." If the Left is smart – and that is truly being questioned by many Americans – they will form a new-found respect for the admiral’s words with regard to the events of April 15th, 2009.

 

If the Right is smart, and in their awakening it appears they are, they will realize this needs to be an ongoing effort, that there is hard work ahead, that everyone must act cohesively and that...

 ...the revolution starts now!

 “We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the constitution.” -– Abraham Lincoln

 

Frank Salvato is the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for BasicsProject.org a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization, BasicsProject.org, partnered in producing the original national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism. He is a member of theInternational Analyst Network  He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel, and is a regular guest on talk radio including on The Captain's America Radio Show airing on AM1220 WSRQ and on the Internet catering to the US Armed Forces around the world and on The Right Balance with Greg Allen syndicated nationally. His opinion-editorials have been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times & Human Events and are syndicated nationally. He is occasionally quoted in The Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking engagements.

He can be contacted at

 

April 16, 2009

I AM and I WILL

I AM and I WILL

By R.J. Godlewski
<© April 15, 2009, All Rights Reserved

RJGodlewski1NOV08

    I am a citizen who simply loves America. Make no bones about it. There is no greater country on the planet in my opinion and I will carry this thought with me to the grave. This great nation of ours gives me the strength, courage, and blessings that I need to not only survive within this world but to actually succeed as well. More importantly, however, I am allowed to fail and fail I have. More times than I care to remember, in fact. For every failure there has been as instrumental lesson learned which I shall also carry with me unto the grave.  That is part of being an American – to rise up from our failures and conquer when all else have given up hope. If you try to stop me from achieving this success, even after many years of failure, I will stop you. And you know that I will.

    I am an American, and a damn proud one at that. I uphold my country’s motto as expressed by the recent pirate incident off Somalia – “you kidnap one of ours, we will kill three of yours”. I will not – ever – apologize for placing great care upon my fellow Americans and desiring that we be protected above all else. I will not cower to the world for fear that I may offend others. I will not permit terrorists, pirates, and other tyrannical thugs to go scot-free just because they complain about injustices or curry favor with liberals. If you try to harm America or any of her citizens and I have the opportunity, I will hurt you instead. And you know that I will.

    I am a veteran who spent four years on active duty in the United States Navy and nearly another four and a half in various aspects of the Reserves. I am damn proud of my two honorable discharges. My current President does not even hold one. When he was barely a year into college, I enlisted within the military. He studied law; I protected the law. He graduated with honors; I served with honor. Therefore, I have no qualms about protecting our country even if I fully disagree with who presently serves within the White House. I have defended America before under a president that I did not vote for (President Reagan) and I will continue to protect American under another president that I did not vote for. And you know that I will.

    I am also a proud Roman Catholic. God so loved the world that He came down amongst us so that we might have eternal life with Him. I am but a miserable sample of His human creatures but I take hope in knowing that His Church is infallible. Part of being Christian is knowing that all other faiths are second-rate at best. The rest of being Christian is knowing that all other human beings are first-rate at worst. What this means is that I scrutinize humanity on an individual basis – I do not arbitrarily lump people into any category for judgment. I do not believe in Judaism or Islam or Buddhism, but I will defend innocent Jews, Muslims, and Buddhists to the best of my ability. And you know that I will.

    I am a fervent capitalist. Economies soar best when left in the hands of the individual. The American businessperson alone creates American jobs and opportunities. Little was given to me but I expect to give much back to this nation in return. I come from humble beginnings and I will always humble myself before other Americans. My talents are on loan from God to serve His purpose. Eventually, these talents will provide my fellow Americans with jobs, contributions, and even education. If those in Washington, D.C. ever try to tell me how to aid my country, what to do with my money or whether I am qualified to embark upon any pursuit, I will gladly correct their thoughts. And you know that I will.

    I am a proud Independent. I hate weak Republicans as much as I do “enlightened” Democrats. I vote for whomever I feel will uphold traditional values and the U.S. Constitution the best. Nobody – repeat nobody—tells me how to vote. I learn, I discover, and I challenge. I vote for the best person available who carries my core values at heart. I will continue to do so. And you know that I will.

    I am a law-abiding citizen. Changes come about within our nation through rational thought and due process. I judge by actions alone and will raise just as much hell over someone who misuses firearms as I would regarding any illegal immigrant. I do not believe that our Constitution is evolving or outdated. It represents the very bedrock of the Republic and I will not permit anyone to chisel away at this foundation. I twice took an oath to uphold our Constitution and I will always do so. And you know that I will.

    I am an educated person – contrary to popular opinion. Education does not, however, suggest having been taught. It means having learned and I have learned quite a bit in my relatively short life. I am a knowledge sponge and absorb as much information as one man can possibly learn. Whether the subject is related to astrophysics, aerodynamics, business, computer technology, literature, music, military history, or sports – I consume until I am full and then embark upon another subject matter to quench my insatiable curiosity. I never argue a point unless I know. And you know that I will.

     I am outspoken – to say the least. I am not afraid, for instance, to call Spaniards miserable crybabies whose glory is long since passed. Want to try Americans as war criminals? It is because of you that Islam has taken root within Europe. Therefore, there can be no greater insult in the world than to call someone a Spaniard in my book. The nation that once settled an entire hemisphere no longer has the backbone necessary to confront radical Islamists who threaten everyone. I have not challenged you on this issue before but as I have said, what greater insult could I unleash than by knowing that you are Spaniards? Alas, I will therefore refrain from aggravating your condition. And you know that I will.

    As I have said, I am an American.  I will not accept anything without challenge. Nor will I allow my country and its people to be harassed by others. You want a piece of me? Well, then, come and get it. I will defend my country, my neighbors, my government, and my ideas to the greatest extent possible. If you harm Americans, if you vote in over-bearing tax and spend policies, if you so much as spit on a photograph of our flag, I will be on your ass like smoke on the water. I do not care if you are Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, or Nancy Pelosi. If you desire for harm to come onto America, I will do everything within my legal power to stop you. And you know that I will. But what about the rest of you?

April 13, 2009

The right of self-defense

Whether we are talking about personal self-defense, or self-defense of air-line pilots and passengers, or personal defense of merchant sailors on open seas -- it is our individual right to protect ourselves.

On the Somali terrorist pirates, "  ...  it remains a scandal that Somali pirates continue to routinely defeat the world's naval powers says  Fred C. Iklé :

So why do we keep rewarding Somali pirates? How is this march of folly possible?

Start by blaming the timorous lawyers who advise the governments attempting to cope with the pirates such as those who had been engaged in a standoff with U.S. hostage negotiators in recent days. These lawyers misinterpret the Law of the Sea Treaty and the Geneva Conventions and fail to apply the powerful international laws that exist against piracy. The right of self-defense -- a principle of international law -- justifies killing pirates as they try to board a ship.  [snip]

The international right of self-defense would also justify an inspection and quarantine regime off the coast of Somalia to seize and destroy all vessels that are found to be engaged in piracy. These inspections could reduce the likelihood that any government will find itself engaged in a hostage situation such as the one that played out in recent days. Furthermore, the U.N. Security Council should prohibit all ransom payments. If the crew of an attacked ship were held hostage, the Security Council could authorize a military blockade of Somalia until the hostages were released.

Cowardice will not defeat terrorism, nor will it stop the Somali pirates. If anything, continuing to meet the pirates' demands only acts as an incentive for more piracy.(continue reading)

America is been active inside Somalia

The U.S. has rained down at least five air strikes on Al Qaeda and its allies in Somalia in the past two years and has unmanned drones spying on targets, said David Shinn, former U.S. ambassador to Ethiopia and State Department coordinator for Somalia.

Counterterror operations in Somalia remain "very covert" as analysts increasingly fret that Al Qaeda will gain a foothold there in a potential safe haven, Shinn said.

While intelligence officials downplay any hard links between Al Qaeda and the pirates, the crisis has increased pressure on President Obama's Pentagon to draw up plans for nailing the brigands in their home bases in six Somali ports, sources said.  [snip]

The CIA stepped up its collection of intelligence over the past year as pirate raids quadrupled alarmingly and an Al Qaeda-affiliated jihadi group, al-Shabaab, rose in potency, sources said.

"Al-Shabaab is operating numerous training camps in southern Somalia attended by some Americans," said the U.S. counterterror official. "We believe that al-Shabaab and Al Qaeda have their sights set on hitting U.S. and Western targets elsewhere in Africa."  (-- James Gordon Meek, NewYorkDailyNews



News around the world
:

David Kilcullen — a former Australian army lieutenant colonel who helped devise the US troop surge that revitalized the American campaign in Iraq — fears Pakistan is at risk of falling under al-Qaeda control, posing a nuclear threat to her neighbors and the West.

Egyptian forces in the Sinai Peninsula have been put on high alert in recent days following the arrest of a Hezbollah spy network operating on Egyptian soil.

Police search for a second al-Qaeda terror cell believed to be planning carnage in the UK.

More on guns:

Some people do not really understand the implications of things, like special guests who reports, "The U.S. Senate passed an amendment by Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) to force the federally subsidized Amtrak to allow passengers to carry firearms in checked bags! And it passed with a whopping 64 favorable votes to boot. Talk about a story under radar! How did this one slip by? Now thugs will think twice before they attempt to mug a little old lady—packing heat!"  Wrong.  The little old lady would not be packing heat, the gun would be in checked baggage, just like the airlines.  Passengers would not have access to the gun.  A gun packed away in the bowls of an airplane or train baggage compartment isn't helping anyone.  [snip]

April 05, 2009

Two years, two people, none too soon.

Two years, two people, none too soon.

By R.J. Godlewski
© April 4, 2009, All Rights Reserved

    Throughout the day yesterday, I, like most Americans I suppose, remained glued to the television as the horrendous shooting in Binghamton, New York unfolded. I have covered a great deal of U.S. territory within my life, but few places that crop up on Fox News Channel hit home for me. Binghamton is one. Besides a handful of fans who occasional visit my Website from that particular location, I have myself been to Binghamton several times. The first being when Sara and I worked within the household goods industry and we relocated a customer from Binghamton to Aurora, Illinois.

    Although I had spent most of my trucking career in the refrigerated goods industry, delivering people’s personal possessions provide you with a chance to get to know “someone” other than a sanitized and impersonal cold storage facility. You come to know their personalities through where they had lived and where they are relocating. You understand their hobbies and chores by the nature of their possessions and the care in which they provide for them. You just cannot move an entire three-bedroom home with the same level of indifference as you would 40 tons of Grade A frozen beef. It is through this effort – of spending perhaps ten hours loading a person’s prized possessions into a fraction of a 45-foot trailer – that I came to know the city of Binghamton some fifteen years ago.

    Today, my heart and prayers go out to the residents of that beautiful town and to the families of those killed and injured within that barbaric attack. I also pray that those who were injured and the families of those killed will not incorporate the actions of a maniac into hatred of America as a whole. America is still the best country on the planet – bar none – as evidenced by so many people desiring to come over here for a chance at a brighter future. If it were within my power, those killed and maimed by yesterday’s actions would become instant citizens in the same manner that those killed down at Virginia Tech were granted their degrees posthumously.

    There is a connection beyond the obvious between Virginia Tech and Binghamton, though nobody probably cares to consider it, for it is relatively insignificant and mostly involves your humble author. Two years ago this month, Debbie Hamilton of Right Truth posted an announcement that my book, Integrated Technical Warfare: An Organizational Guide to Creating a Corporate Counterterrorism Force , would be her Blog’s “book of the month” for that May. Since the terrible shooting at Virginia Tech, I have released the PDF version of ITW as a public courtesy. I felt that if someone could take away a bit of practical knowledge from the book that might just increase their personal safety, then it was far more important than whether I received a paltry two-buck profit.

    Since that decision, hundreds if not thousands of people have downloaded ITW throughout the world and it is impossible to know whether those copies were distributed to even more readers. A few have written to me that they have enjoyed the text. Others have posted that it was a complete “piece of fiction”. I guess that goes with the territory, but I rather have ten thousand enemies if I could just benefit one single individual. I think that Debbie would agree, which is why I suspect that she keeps Right Truth Blog going even when it becomes a drain on her and her personal life. That one person benefitted means much more than the hundreds that ridicule the effort.

    During the course of the past two years, I have lost track of how many articles and features I have written for Right Truth Blog and its readers. She had posted an article of mine regarding leadership and I replied with a courtesy copy of ITW in gratitude. Our friendship took off from that moment onwards and, as I said, I have lost track of how many postings on Right Truth bear my name. I have a good idea, though. Google my name and you will see almost 7,000 pages ascribed to R.J. Godlewski. Most of those come from my association with Debbie Hamilton.

    I believe that our friendship is based upon our united effort to show our love for this great country of ours by doing whatever we can to defeat her enemies, both foreign and domestic. We collaborate, each in our individual way, in the Independent Counterterrorist training program, which is an extension of the goal behind ITW. We simply want our citizenry to assume a larger role in their own safety and survival. I suspect that I am the more unbridled of the two of us – I believe that captured terrorists should be hung from their scrotum on public television for the entire planet to partake of our desire to bring harm to those who wish to kill or maim our friends and neighbors. Call me radical; just do not call me weak.

    That our ICT training program has, perhaps, reached an even greater audience – through its various “modules” – than even ITW proves that we are not alone in this ambition to rid the world of tyrants and terrorists. The range of nations represented by ICT readers is far too broad to list here and includes many Muslim nations such as Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Iran – not exactly locations friendly to the United States from a leadership perspective. In one of those strange coincidences of fate too peculiar to mention, I have more fans today in Vietnam than from any other nation outside the United States. It is a nationality represented on both sides of the massacre in Binghamton. The world is thus simply too small to ignore troubles anywhere.

    There is no one cause for why some people decide to terrify and murder others. Our more “enlightened” culture can lay blame to whichever group and grievance they deem appropriate but the truth remains that we live within a comparatively civilized era just the same. There have been those who desire to kill and maim others ever since there were neighbors upon this planet. This did not begin with America’s involvement within the Middle East. It did not begin with Israel’s occupation of the disputed territories. It will not end with a global “Green” movement either. For all of our billions, there are only three types of people upon this tiny planet of ours – those who wish to destroy, those who care less about being destroyed, and those who want to do something about the first two groups. Debbie and I fall into this latter classification.

    We will not allow our nation to go down without a fight. We will not permit our citizenry to become inept and fodder for terrorists and impotent leaders. America represents the people and it is “We the people” that need to rise up and challenge both our politicians and those hell-bent on our destruction. Care to join us?  Or are you permanently anchored to the sidelines? The time for Americans (and others) to fight back has come none too soon…

   

March 30, 2009

Anti-jihad group helps fill U.S. ammo shortage

Via email:  Worldnetdaily Supports, ATF'S Counter-Jihad Fundraiser - .223 ammunition sale


An ammunition manufacturer and a non-profit group are teaming up in a unique venture to help address both the short supply of commercial ammo and the need to alert Americans about the threat of radical Islam.

America's Truth Forum announced it is making available through its website .223 Remington (5.56) rounds suitable for all sporting and military-style rifles, including the AR-15 and Ruger Mini-14.

"Like gold and silver, ammunition is coming into vogue as an affordable security investment - a multi-purpose asset that not only protects homes from violent attacks and citizens from tyrannical oppression but a tangible one that could be bartered as collateral during the most troubling economic times," says the president of America's Truth Forum, Jeff Epstein.

Purchasers of the ammunition will have an opportunity to donate to America's Truth Forum, Epstein said, and help "awaken our citizenry to the radical Islamic-Jihadist threat."

"If we fail to take the appropriate actions now, our children will be left to carry on the battle against an even stronger and more determined foe, an evil whose flame we failed to extinguish," he said. "Our legacy should be one of bravely confronting our adversaries and of diligently defending what is rightfully ours. Our actions need to serve as motivating examples for future generations, instilling in them the proclivity to stand resolute in the face of evil."

Learn here why it's your right -- and duty -- to be armed.
As WND reported, firearm sales have spiked since the election of a perceived anti-gun president, and the stockpiling of bullets has stressed the ammunition market.
The Orlando Sentinel reported months of steady, heavy buying have left gun dealers facing shortages of ammunition.

"The survivalist in all of us comes out," John Ritz, manager of a Florida shooting range, told the Sentinel. "It's more about protecting what you have."

"People are just stockpiling," said a spokeswoman for Georgia Arms, which has seen bullet sales jump 100 percent since the election. "A gun is just like a car. If you can't get gas, you can't use it."

WND reported earlier this month that amid outrage from private gun owners, the Department of Defense scrapped a new policy that would deplete the supply of ammunition by requiring destruction of fired military cartridge brass.

The policy already had taken a bite out of the nation's ammunition supply, leaving arms dealers scrambling to find ammo for private gun owners.

The Department of Defense explained it had placed small arms cartridge cases on its list of sensitive munitions items as part of an overall effort to ensure national security is not jeopardized in the sale of any Defense property.

Montana's two Democratic senators, Jon Tester and Max Baucus, pressed the issue with Defense officials, arguing that "prohibiting the sale of fired military brass would reduce the supply of ammunition - preventing individual gun owners from fully exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms."

.223 REM. (5.56) AMMO
 
 As widely reported, commercial ammunition is in short supply - in particular, .223 Remington (5.56) rounds suitable for all sporting and military-style rifles including the AR-15 and Ruger Mini-14.  America's Truth Forum (ATF) is pleased to announce that a patriotic American corporation has agreed to fill this void by manufacturing and distributing small-arms ammunition, to qualified purchasers, in support of our educational initiative.  

  
Caliber: .223 Remington (5.56)
Bullet weight: 55 grains
Muzzle velocity: 3200 fps

Place of manufacture: USA
Newly Manufactured:   NOT RELOADS!!!!
Packaging 1000 Round cases
Price: $455 / 1000
Shipping Charge $20.00 (Flat fee)
State sales Tax: N/A 

Supplies are limited so order now!   Product details and ordering information are posted on our site at:

www.americastruthforum.com

March 28, 2009

Joshua, Joshua, Where Art Thou Joshua?

Joshua, Joshua, Where Art Thou Joshua?

By R.J. Godlewski
© March 28, 2009, All Rights Reserved
(Right Truth Exclusive)


    I do not know about you, but I believe that it is high time we go Biblical on the Islamist terrorists seeking to destroy our country and our world. Ever since I have been studying terrorism – since the early 1970’s, to be certain – our nation seems to function in spurts regarding its counterterrorism functions. We remain peaceful. We are attacked. We hit back. We grow bored. We go back to being peaceful. We are attacked again. A never-ending cycle that will only cease when our adversaries are pushing up daisies.  Or whatever the hell sprouts up in the desert.

    Our nation was never inclined to worry about civility in conquering anything. We came to exist through the exploits of such legendary souls as Captain Jedediah Strong Smith who, after having an enraged grizzly nearly swallow his head whole, calmly instructed  companion James Clyman in the proper technique of sewing his face – and dangling ear – back together again  (Goetzmann 2006, 113-115). It was not only the mauling bears that our ancestors battled either. The weather could be just as dangerous, yet herein lay tales of even more extraordinary Americans – Crow Indians “naked to the waist and almost contemptuous of the sub-zero weather” were joined by Clyman and others in massive buffalo hunts (Goetzmann 2006, 115).

    Somewhere between those literally snatching defeat out from the mouths of grizzly bears in the early nineteenth century and our modern, convenience-driven culture of today, our national leadership simply lost the will to devour our enemies. Apparently, it did not take very long for during the later years of the nineteenth century General Nelson A. “Bear Coat” Miles charged his contemporaries with treating vanquished Apaches as “conquerors than prisoners”, arguing that “They have been petted and, if that policy is continued, they will furnish warriors for the next twenty years”  (Utley 1989, 89). One can just imagine General Miles’ spirit lambasting the current Obama Administration over its “petting” of our Muslim adversaries today.

    Human evolution, being what it is, has ensured us of the ability to do unto others before, during, and after they have dealt unto us. In short, peace is “the aberration of the human condition”  (Godlewski 2008, 25). We are genetically and psychologically geared towards beating the hell out of our competition in order to survive. Regardless, we now find it “offensive” to wage war. We do not seem to have any inhibitions towards finding ourselves involved within wars, it is just that we never find the courage to obliterate our enemies once we find ourselves engaged within them. At least not since the end of the Second World War.

    Long gone is the time when we feared God and challenged man. Today, we are far more likely to challenge God and fear man. This imbalance of nature has shortchanged our  national security, giving rise to a Washington leadership and Mainstreet population without the confidence necessary to lay waste to radical Islam. Oh, if only we could find a modern Joshua today. Someone who could accept God’s law and “not swerve from it either to the right or to the left” (Jos 1:7 NAB). Sadly, our left is criminal and our right is incompetent. Our Congress is staffed with people whose ideals of heroism parallel that of ancient Eleazar, also called Avaran, who was killed stabbing a drunken elephant in the belly (1 Mc 6:44-46 NAB).  Today, it will not just be the jackasses who are crushed underneath the weight of an inebriated pachyderm.  We, the American people, are being smothered under the bloated belly of “change” and the GOP is the one dishing out the vodka to spike the Democrats' Kool-Aid.

    Where is our Joshua? Our military commander who is not afraid to put to death all those who subvert our security and purpose (Jos 1:18 NAB)? Who amongst us can “go out to war against [our] enemies and…[will] not be afraid of them, for the Lord [our] God” is with them (Dt 20:1 NAB]? Who amongst us today is quite capable of waging war by “putting to the sword all living creatures…men and women, young and old, as well as oxen, sheep, and asses” (Jos 6:21).

    Our culture today largely consists of sheep and asses that watch Jericho but cannot understand the tactics, psychological warfare, and intelligence witnessed by the actual town bearing the name. We do not want to fight; we want to debate and herein we find our future resting solely in the hands of the “Great Community Organizer”. Whereas the Great Communicator  once warned us about the “Evil Empire” and proceeded to pound it into bankruptcy his contemporary warns us about the evil of empire and proceeds to pound us into bankruptcy.

    Where enemies of a state were once hung, drawn, and quartered; modern adversaries are fed with hind quarters. Where General Douglas MacArthur once spoke boldly that “It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it”  (Godlewski, Surgical Warfare: An Impediment to Conflict Resolution? 2003-2006), we now enter all our wars with the meter running for the whole world to observe. Our national surrender begins as soon as a conflict commences.

    Our economy has cycled down, and our Treasury Secretary wants to abandon two hundred  and thirty-three years of heritage.  The drug cartels in Mexico are battling their own country but our leaders want to restrict our right to arm and protect ourselves. Our entrepreneurs invented the aerospace industry but because the rest of the world is “Green” with envy, the ruling class in Washington wants to tamper with our innovative spirit. That white flag of surrender that our Legislature and Presidency is waving in front of the Islamists, Cartels, and Tyrannies is none other than the Constitution of the United States of America and we need to restore it back to its rightful place of honor within our society.

    Like Joshua of old, we need to circle Washington with our “army”, trumpeting our voices loudly until the walls of bureaucracy come tumbling down. Only then can we safely inhabit the land that God has laid out before us and welcome all people back into our fold. Only when we pave over our enemies can we hope to build the towering structure of civility that carries the torch of freedom and liberty atop its apex. Only when we remain America can we become the United States.


    R.J. Godlewski is a member of the National Military Intelligence Association, the National Rifle Association, Golden Key International Honour Society, a veteran of the United States Navy, and a student of Middle East Terrorism and Explosive Ordnance Disposal operations. He is the author of the Independent Counterterrorist training modules.


References


Godlewski, R.J. Mini-Manual of the Independent Counterterrorist. Houghton Lake: Road Sailor Books, 2008.

—. Surgical Warfare: An Impediment to Conflict Resolution? 2003-2006. http://www.rjgodlewski.com/SurgicalWarfare.html (accessed March 28, 2009).

Goetzmann, William H. Exploration and Empire: The Explorer and the Scientist in the Winning of the American West. New York: History Book Club, 2006.

Utley, Robert L. "Crook and Miles, Fighting and Feuding on the Indian Frontier." MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History, Autumn 1989: 81-91.


   

March 25, 2009

Defending America against Obama’s Franken-Geithner Monster: The recurrent need for an American National Militia.

Defending America against Obama’s Franken-Geithner Monster:
The recurrent need for an American National Militia.

By R.J. Godlewski


© March 25, 2009, All Rights Reserved

(Right Truth Exclusive)


    Okay, we have all had our laugh. We have elected our first partially-black, partially-American, partially-Christian, partially-Senator, partially-transparent, partially-hopeful, partially-sympathetic-to-the-handicapped, and partially-able-to-speak-without-a-teleprompter-present president in U.S. history. It has been the gag to surpass all humor and, in true American form, we have even learned some valuable lessons from our jovial spontaneity. Conservatives have learned that to moderate is to surrender and Liberals have learned that simply wishing for “anybody but Bush” might lead them into desires best left unwished for.

    We get it by now. That to vote in an inexperienced, Ivy-league indoctrinated community organizer comes with a hefty price tag – namely $10 trillion. Even the rest of the world is laughing along with us. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is simply hysterical over our gift of nuclear weapons purchased via the hideaway plan.   Hugo Chavez is happy because he can now boast that our new president knows absolutely squat about Latin America – never even having visited there. Ol’ Vlad Putin would be laughing too, but he is just a bit too serious for true comedy. I doubt that he would be friends with Obama anyway; Russians were never too polite towards blacks – partial or otherwise.

    Under normal circumstances, I would be laughing now too. After all, I possess more business experience (successful or not, take your pick), more military experience (four years’ U.S. Navy, ~ four and a half years’ U.S. Navy Reserve), more Latin American experience (I’ve at least been down to Brazil),  more “Green” experience (my carbon footprint barely registers)  and more American experience (I’ve lived here my whole life except for brief Navy deployments overseas) than my new President! There are even several legitimate copies of my Michigan birth certificate floating around the institutions of Hawaii. For someone my age, all this is pretty damn hilarious. Officially speaking, I even have more experience combating terrorism – in my own unique little way – with my formal efforts beginning in 1994 and my semi-formal intentions dating back to 1979. Actually, you know, I kept up on that whole Patty Hearst affair pretty well so I think that my interest in fighting terrorists goes back fairly far into my life. Regardless, I know there is a global war on terror out there and that it entails combating Islam. Our president doesn’t know that despite his Ivy-league credentials.

    Still, I have been faulted for being too strict, too judgmental. Creature of habit, I suppose. Who am I to criticize someone that sixty-five million others think of as the next messiah? I just wonder where all of this “hope” is leading us. I have done, as illustrated above, my share in protecting this great nation of ours. Our president no longer – nor ever did, apparently – have the stomach to fight our enemies. I can complain about that because it is his DUTY to battle our enemies. So, I guess, I can judge him about being a piss poor military commander.

    Secondly, I see Mr. Obama alienating a large portion of our economic base – particularly the capitalists who are its very foundation. The entire colonization of the New World came about because of – dare I say? –  human greed, so there’s nothing inherently “unproven” in that. The Pilgrims even paid seven years’ wages just to come over here for a shot at the Big Time. Therefore, if you do not mind too terribly much, I will judge our president here too because America is a capitalistic society specifically designed against government interference. Mr. Obama’s policies are against American tradition, ergo Mr. Obama is anti-American, if in action only.

    It is bad enough that Mr. Obama wants to subjugate our nation to the likes of illegal aliens, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Islamists, thereby shirking his duties as our Commander-in-Chief, but his administration also wants to deny the rest of us our God-given, Constitutionally-protected right to bear arms and protect ourselves. Sorry, but anyone who intentionally flies in the face of God and the U.S. Constitution simply has to be judged. It does not bother me that I could probably outshoot our president in competition and that he holds no interest in owning firearms, but why should he work so diligently to deny the sixty-five million of us who do own guns? If he abandons our interests, then I am free to abandon the interests of those who placed him into office. Yet, I cannot.

    Everyone makes major mistakes within their lives and usually we do so by the time that we are thirty years old.  Strangely, this is pretty much the same age group that had placed Mr. Obama into office. Could they now be regretting their decision to toss our nation’s future into someone’s hands that has no verifiable experience whatsoever for the position? Possibly.

    Myself, I am a survivor. I have been through economic crises before. I know enough of the “natural world” to survive should the “material world” disappear and, well, that is how things look now. The question is what we do with the likes of President Obama, Congresswoman Pelosi, and Senator Reid – a new “Axis of Evil” if you will. A new tripartite leadership of liberal tyranny. Sadly, we cannot physically remove them from office though I bet nearly everyone has toyed with the idea at least once.

    Our legal options are therefore very limited indeed. Our ethical solutions are even more challenging. However, we can undertake two quite pronounced actions. One admittedly more practical than the other. We can vote them out of office at the earliest opportunity. On the other hand, we can simply complain loudly enough to make them resign and then we can start working on getting bumbling Veep Joe Biden to follow suit. The choice is yours and you need to start acting fast.

    As I read about a $4 Trillion dollar budget deficit and an eroding economic base, I am losing things to laugh about at both the national and local levels. In Minnesota, comedian à l'effet contraire Al Franken is still suing to become a bona fide politician. In Missouri, the state police are salivating over how many people they can include within the ranks of militias. And in Washington, D.C. , confessed tax cheat Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner now wants the ChiComs to create a new world currency. As if we do not have enough garbage manufactured in China already!

    About the only bright spot on the evening news is that many European leaders are now openly criticizing President Obama’s orgasmic spending rituals. So much for George W. Bush destroying our credibility in the Old World – President Obama took less than two months to get all the former adversaries of the Second World War to agree on his idiocy. I knew the honeymoon would not last.

    However, we can now shed two fundamental discrepancies in our national psyche. First, “White America” no longer needs to fear being labeled as racist if we do not vote for the first black that buys his party’s nomination. We can now simply show that Europe has also realized that political assholes can come from any race – that we no longer need to jump on anyone’s bandwagon solely out of fear of disagreement. It is quite sad, though, to realize just how many properly qualified and honest black Americans may never be able to run for president because “The One” destroyed what little credibility “Change” had.  It used to be the Dope from Hope. Now, it is just Hope from dope and the liberals keep on smoking.

    America’s future has been tossed from the track. Forget the previous forty-three presidents; Barack Obama has done more to destroy America than every fascist and communist adversary from the past century. His administration clearly wants tyrannical powers to commandeer businesses which they feel might harm America’s economy (such as proving to be far too successful);  to confiscate firearms from Americans who might need to defend themselves against Mexican drug cartels (who are probably paying those in the BOH Administration to silence our Constitutional rights);  and now they want American greenbacks sacrificed in exchange for Red notes.

    What I cannot understand, is why we are not seeing masses pouring into the streets and demanding that our government shed itself of despotic ambitions and restore our beloved Constitution. Our government is experiencing the same kind of psychotic personality disorder that leads führender Liberaler Phil Donahue to suggest that if the Roman Catholic Church were to abandon its complete doctrinal history then more “young people” would be willing to join its ranks. In other words, if the Roman Catholic Church would just cease to exist then maybe there would be more people willing to call themselves Roman Catholics. Well, Mr. Donahue will undoubtedly fry in hell but we cannot wait as long to make our politicians pay for their transgressions. Not while our future is at stake.

    Listen, I love America. I think that it is by far the best nation on the planet. Our proud citizens hail from every race, every ethnicity, every religion, and every country on the planet. What makes us equal, ironically, is our individuality. Our founding fathers created a nation “of the people” – not just another country subjugated by royal decree. First amongst the amendments to the Constitution was the provision that:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”


    What this means is, of course, that Congress cannot mandate, among other things, that the Roman Catholic Church support abortions, gay rights, and such other ridiculous beliefs that subvert its infallibility. The first amendment also guarantees the right to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances.  In America, I have a Constitutionally-guaranteed right to stand outside the White House, pray my rosary, and call Mr. Obama the infamous “N” word should I chose to do so.  And, friends, as long as I did not do so with the sole intent of creating a riot, I could petition the legal system to uphold my rights thereof and, under the Constitution, the courts would have no viable alternative but to uphold my actions. If – and herein is a very large word – they bound themselves to the Constitution in the first place.

    America’s problem today rests not with our economic situation, but with the growing numbers of leaders and other authoritative figures who are abandoning the Constitution in favor of personal agendas. Forgot George W. Bush’s alleged abandoning of personal privacy – one “right” fully ignored by the Constitution – today’s politicians are intentionally trying to subvert our laws in order to force us to surrender to their will.

    This is wrong. This is why we possess a Constitution in the first place – to prevent tyrants from gaining foothold within our beloved country. The first amendment makes us free. The second amendment – the right to keep and bear arms – keeps us free. It is the American person – not the police, not the government, not even the military – that bears fundamental responsibility for protecting our Constitution. By remaining armed – and trained – we can have the ability to toss out those who tried to enslave us. That’s heavy.

    Adolf Hitler could not have come to power if the “ordinary Germans” had marched against his own march on Berlin. Instead, he took away their guns and they gladly handed their freedoms over to him. Saddam Hussein could not have come to power if the Iraqis had shot him instead of his shooting the opposition and leading to such future atrocities as the gassing of Halabja.

    The only people in the United States who are not equal are our politicians for they are our servants. We are not theirs. We might cry foul over the bonuses paid to AIG executives, but what Congress and the President have done to us is far greater a tragedy than all of the bonuses and golden parachutes on the planet. The AIG executives might have done a poor job of running their company, but the bonuses were part of their agreed upon salary. Those in Washington have been charged with upholding our Constitution, a job that they have done far worse than those bastards over at AIG.

    I call upon America – blacks, whites, Democrats, Republicans, Christians, atheists, everyone – to take back this great nation of ours. Let our votes and telephone calls descend upon Washington like Biblical plagues of justice. Let us form an American National Militia to safeguard our Constitution and hold those charged with its protection accountable for their actions. We do not need an armed revolt in Washington – at least I hope we do not need one – but need to be just as militaristic in our intentions.

    Thousands upon thousands of brave Americans have died to keep our flag flying and our Constitution revered. We owe them the respect that comes from sacrificing our “free time” to ensure that our politicians and national leaders do not permit personal agenda to stand in the way of national security and liberty. Let them not have died in vain. Let us fight Capitol Hill and fire everyone who picks away at the Constitution. What are you waiting for? A new leader to emerge? Look in the damn mirror!

   

March 09, 2009

Protect your guns, they will protect you

Obama Lies To Gun Owners As Holder Reveals Gun Attack Plan

As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama deliberately and repeatedly lied to America's 90 million gun owners across the country when he insisted that he would not try to take away anyone's firearms, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.

CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, reacting to yesterday's remarks by Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder that the president will seek to reinstate the ban on semi-automatic firearms, said Obama "knew he was lying to the nation because his own website touted his plan to revive the gun ban and make it permanent."

Select Here to Reject Gun Bans and Fax to all 100 Senators and all 435 House Representatives


The Obama administration wants to make if so difficult to get or keep personal firearms, that eventually no private citizen will have any guns.  There is a new push to ban assault rifles in the works too.  With the economic situation continuing to go downhill, with possible domestic violence on the rise, with terrorists within our own borders, with  Mexican violence crossing the border into the US, we need to protect ourselves now more than ever.

A U.S. citizen was one of the three men who were found decapitated this week in Tijuana, Mexican authorities said Friday.

The body of George Harrison, a 38-year-old former Chula Vista resident, had been dismembered and mutilated and was dumped in a vacant lot near Tijuana’s beachside bullring.  (continue)

March 01, 2009

Separation of Church and Will: There is no joy in Obamaville

Separation of Church and Will:
There is no joy in Obamaville


By R.J. Godlewski

© March 1, 2009, All Rights Reserved
(Right Truth Exclusive)

When I look around me – more, when I look inside me – I see such ridiculous joylessness that it seems as if the Good News was never preached. The common Christianity in the land is: ‘God exists and love your neighbor.’ This is not the Good News; in fact, it is neither good nor news, but a poor platitude inexplicably encumbered by a transcendental mystification.” Peter Kreeft, Everything you ever wanted to know about Heaven but never dreamed of asking! (Ignatius)


    One thing that I always liked about Christ was that He always surrounded Himself with the self-employed – carpenters, tax collectors, fishermen, prostitutes – and I have said this on many occasions. It does, however, bear more scrutiny in light of today’s economic stress. He Who came to aid the poor and chastise those in positions of power and “Enlightenment” chose to befriend those who created jobs and managed small businesses. After all, for thirty years he aided his step dad with the family business. The moral of the story, of course, is that Jesus sided with those who created things instead of simply demanding them from others.

    There is not a single parable within the whole New Testament that tells of someone receiving something that 1.) they did not earn themselves or 2.) was not given to them by God Himself. Furthermore, when God gave, He did so from His heart; His Gifts did not come based upon our integrity. We can learn much from these parables today, but few of us could really be considered as “Joyful Christians”.

    In a way, this is not a religious article. I merely wanted a tie-in to the concept of joy, which isn’t found or discovered or handed out. Joy is God and if He possesses us then we cannot ignore joy for it is within us as He is always within us. What began these thoughts, unfortunately, is entirely political.

    Rush Limbaugh has been in the news as of late because he expressed his desire that President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus plan and other liberal policies fail. Democrats have caricaturized Mr. Limbaugh as unpatriotic for this statement. I would argue that it is Mr. Obama who is unpatriotic for it is his policies that run contrary to American values and our Constitution. I, however, believe that the crux of this argument is not whether Mr. Limbaugh or Mr. Obama is patriotic or not, but whether either is joyful.

    I have not listened to Mr. Limbaugh’s radio program since February of 2005. Having said that, whenever I see the man being interviewed on television or giving speeches in public or simply being quoted, I see a person wrapped within joy. No, I do not mean that it is joyful to listen to him. What I mean is that he exudes joy in doing what he does. You cannot listen to his words and not believe that the man truly, honestly, believes in what he says.

    One cannot help but imagine Mr. Limbaugh sitting at home, enjoying his cigars, comfortable in the knowledge that he has created something rather unique within this great nation of ours. Even when he battled his alleged OxyContin® addiction, one cannot help but believe in the joy he must have felt when he finally conquered the vice. The same must have gone for his recovery from deafness. Joy is joy. We cannot define it because it simply is.

    Someone who I do not see as particularly joyful is our President, Barack Obama. I do not detect the “glow” of joy about him. Never did. And it might have something to do with him not believing a word that he says. Granted, he is the highest elected official in the country and serves during an economic recession, but he does not – ever – reflect the same human glow that his predecessor showed.

    The man who preached “Hope” and “Change” during the election cycle now cries “Catastrophe” and stocks his staff with people whose policies were soundly rejected in the 1990’s. Mr. Obama claims to be a Christian, yet after twenty years he could not remember a word his pastor spoke. He claims to be proudly American, but cannot remember the communists and terrorists that he associated with all through his life. He claims to have been born in Hawaii but, for some reason, fears showing the world his birth certificate.

    I am almost positive that Mr. Limbaugh knows more about the cigars that he smokes than Mr. Obama knows about the friends that he keeps. Perhaps Mr. Limbaugh simply enjoys his cigars more than our President enjoys his associates. There is a lesson in all of this for the rest of us. Joy is not necessarily what we have, but how we think about what we have.

    I have been laid off from work more times within my life than I can remember. I have lost homes, automobiles, and, yes, even my wife to cancer. When I look back upon the past four and a half decades, however, it’s not the material things that I remember. It is the things that I have done within my life that I remember most of all. It is the songs that I’ve composed, the books that I have written, the photographs that I have taken,  the jobs that I have created, and the one love that I devoted my entire existence to taking care of. You will kindly note that I have not made any references to fame and/or fortune.

    Now that our economy has tanked, I still find joy in the simpler things. I am joyful to be able to live within a free enough society where I can write and publish pretty much anything that comes to my mind. I look now upon the wall of my office/bedroom and feel joy as I observe photographs of two of the Navy ships that I served aboard during the early 1980’s. I feel joy as I stare at the simple oil painting that my late father labored over many, many years ago. I feel joy simply looking at my worn out old dog who I had to crawl into a culvert fourteen years ago this just passed February and rescue. I can still hear Sara’s words quite distinctly, “We are not keeping that damn dog!” Rocky brought more joy into Sara’s life than I can recount here.

    Life is never meant to be easy, but that does not exclude joy even many years after the fact. In 1994, Sara and I were left stranded in San Antonio for the weekend with only a buck between the two of us. A whole pantheon of strange events left us without any way of retrieving funds from the trucking company that we drove for and so we were left sharing a Kentucky Fried Chicken® sandwich for the entire weekend. Horrible then. Joyful today. Such are the memories of the deceased.

    There are very few things that I can imagine that I have not personally experienced in some form or another. What I have experienced, however, has shown me through the concept of time to be joyful in the very passing of that time. This is where I believe that President Barack Obama will go down in history as our worst president ever. He simply cannot understand the concept of joy. Neither can his “I have never been proud of my country…” wife. To enjoy life, you must allow the joy which is within you to come flowing out unimpeded.

    I enjoy shooting my guns. President Obama wants to deny me of this right. His administration’s latest excuse is that by my owning guns, somehow the Mexicans are in danger. Listen, Mr. President, I have to travel south to get to Canada. I do not think that anything I do affects the drug cartels in Juarez.  I enjoy seeing smiles upon little children as they move through stores awed beyond belief by the stuffed animals. Mr. Obama wants to promote abortion as a form of mandated birth control. I enjoy knowing that God chose me to be part of His Church, yet Mr. Obama continually tries to sacrifice my faith in order to appeal to infidels who call me, you’ve guessed it, Infidel in return. I have nothing against Muslims, for example, I just do not believe they will get into Heaven unless they come to know Christ in their own way.  What brings me joy is knowing that it is God, not me, who makes that ultimate determination – of who is Christian and who is not.

    You simply cannot know joy unless you know God, for God is Joy. Building a barrier between this fact and your attitude isn’t going to make life enjoyable. If anything, it makes you miserable. You can see this everyday – joyless people. They want the Government to make them happy by providing them with someone else’s money. Their arguments usually sound something like “My boss pays me a sorry-assed wage and works me hard so he doesn’t deserve his nice home and car. Give me his money!” These types should be joyful that they haven’t experienced what most self-made people have experienced within life. Others, weighed down from exuberant purchases, want everyone else to pay for their transgressions. Part of my joy is realizing how many errors I’ve experienced in life and knowing that someday, I will be able to pull myself out of these troubles through my own efforts.

    There can be thus no separation between Church (Joy) and Will (Happiness) for both come from and represent eternal life with God. Barack Obama cannot grant you joy. Nancy Pelosi cannot grant you joy. Pleasing the Muslims cannot grant you joy. Only giving your entire ‘will’ to God – being content with what He has challenged you with and making something out of it – will bring you a joyful life. Everyone else just wants to bitch and take what is not rightfully his or hers.
   

February 22, 2009

Better Bubba than Barry

Better Bubba than Barry

By R.J. Godlewski
© Sunday, February 22, 2009, All Rights Reserved
(Right Truth Exclusive)


    You might have caught Glen Beck on Friday “war-gaming” the potential threats to the United States. One of his scenarios involved the “Bubba Factor”, the inherent rise in militias as confidence in the federal government decreases. I will be the first one to admit that I do not place much stock in so-called militias – private communes of citizens arming themselves against Legislative aggression – but this does not mean that I abandon the concept itself. Merely that I trust very few individuals without careful scrutiny on my part. That makes me human. That I believe that all men were created equal and that our founding fathers placed the government into our care makes me American.

    While I am not one of those barricading myself in my home for fear that Big Brother will come crashing through the walls in armored vehicles, I am quite prepared to handle the situation should it ever arrive. For well over two hundred years, our nation earned the respect of the entire planet for our defiance towards tyranny. We beat George III. We beat slavery. We beat fascism. We even beat the bounds of earth’s gravity. So when we find ourselves faced with an interminable camp representing us in Washington, I do not fear as much as others may.

    Our Congress and our President are toying with a fire that they cannot quench. They may be cramming a bloated “stimulus” package down our throats, but they cannot silence the American “free enterprise” spirit. They cannot toy with our Constitution without incurring the wrath of those who have pledged to defend it. A symptom of Liberalism is the irrational belief that any government’s ways are superior to what has worked for thousands of years. Its antidote is obeying God’s Law while human law matures. While you can be American without believing in God, you cannot remain free while believing the state to be superior to the individual. This is our current Government’s most fatal flaw.

    President Obama, who once seduced our nation with fraudulent claims of hope, now preaches eternal damnation if we do not obey his line-item entitlements without challenge. How much more hopeful we would be if our leader had actually spent some of his youth getting to know this very nation, getting to know the very people that he now serves. Instead, President Obama is trying to sacrifice our future in order to pay those who have elevated him to an office he may not actually deserve.

    I possess one argument against Mr. Obama’s stimulus package that he cannot challenge: if we spend $1 Trillion now, how will we be able to withstand the loss of two or three of our cities through terrorism? If we bury ourselves further into debt by building new infrastructure, how will we be able to replace this infrastructure if al-Qaeda or Iran decides to destroy it? The terrorists are patient, but we are greedy. Those who obtain office through any means necessary do not care one iota about those of us who placed them there.

    When failing automakers are ridiculed over the use of luxury jets, our President is flying seemingly everywhere on the most expensive one imaginable. His example is far more egregious, however. I can decide not to purchase a new car in protest. I cannot withhold from paying taxes. If Christ can humble Himself to wash the feet of His disciples, President Obama can wash his Administration of waste.

    With Mexico on the verge of failure (its economy already failed once in 1982), terrorists on the verge of destroying several of our cities, and our economy on the verge of a liberal-induced depression, I will take the Bubbas over President Barry any day. At least the Bubbas do not want to steal any of my hard-earned money.

February 19, 2009

Gun Humor and Truth

Doctors vs Gun owners (via email, hat tip Betty)

Doctors 

(A)   The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000.

(B)   Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are   120,000.  

(C)   Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171.

Statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services.     

Now think about this: 

Guns

(A)   The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000.    (Yes, that's 80 million)

(B)   The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is  1,500.    

(C)   The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is    .000188.  

Statistics courtesy of FBI 

So, statistically, doctors are approximately 

9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners. 

Remember, 'Guns don't kill people, doctors do..' 
 
FACT:   NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT  

ALMOST EVERYONE HAS AT LEAST ONE DOCTOR. 

Please alert your friends to this  alarming threat.  (bwhahaha) 

We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!! 

Out of concern for the public at large,  I withheld the statistics on 
lawyers  for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention!



Why I Carry a Gun , (via email from LazarusUSA, at the NEW Gun Room.  hat tip R.J. Godlewski)


My old grandpa once said to me, "Son, there comes a time in every man's life when he stops bustin' knuckles and starts bustin' caps and usually it's when he becomes too old to take an ass whoopin'.

I don't carry a gun to kill people. I carry a gun to keep from being killed.

I don't carry a gun to scare people. I carry a gun because sometimes this world can be a scary place.

I don't carry a gun because I'm paranoid. I carry a gun because there are real threats in the world.

I don't carry a gun because I'm evil. I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the world.

I don't carry a gun because I hate the government. I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.

I don't carry a gun because I'm angry. I carry a gun so that I don't have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be prepared.

I don't carry a gun because I want to shoot someone. I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed, and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.

I don't carry a gun because I'm a cowboy. I carry a gun because, when I die and go to Heaven, I want to be a cowboy.

I don't carry a gun to make me feel like a man. I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love.

I don't carry a gun because I feel inadequate. I carry a gun because, unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.

I don't carry a gun because I love it. I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me.

"Police Protection" is an oxymoron. Free citizens must protect themselves. Police do not protect you from crime; they usually just investigate the crime after it happens and then call someone in to clean up the mess.

Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take an ass whoopin'."

..author unknown (but obviously brilliant)

Remember the average response time to a 911 call is over 4 minutes.
 
The average response time of a 357 magnum is 1400 FPS

 
 

February 06, 2009

HR 45: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009

I warned you here about this.   Congressman, Rep. Bobby Rush [D-IL], Introduces Controversial Gun-Control Bill to provide for the implementation of a system of licensing for purchasers of certain firearms and for a record of sale system for those firearms, and for other purposes.  Here's the full text of the bill, and here's a summary of the bill, from GovTrack:

Congressional Research Service Summary

The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress. GovTrack did not write and has no control over these summaries.

1/6/2009--Introduced.
Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 - Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license under this Act or a state system certified under this Act and such license has not been invalidated or revoked. Prescribes license application, issuance, and renewal requirements.
Prohibits transferring or receiving a qualifying firearm unless the recipient presents a valid firearms license, the license is verified, and the dealer records a tracking authorization number. Prescribes firearms transfer reporting and record keeping requirements. Directs the Attorney General to establish and maintain a federal record of sale system.
Prohibits: (1) transferring a firearm to any person other than a licensee, unless the transfer is processed through a licensed dealer in accordance with national instant criminal background check system requirements, with exceptions; (2) a licensed manufacturer or dealer from failing to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements of this Act; (3) failing to report the loss or theft of the firearm to the Attorney General within 72 hours; (4) failing to report to the Attorney General an address change within 60 days; or (5) keeping a loaded firearm, or an unloaded firearm and ammunition for the firearm, knowingly or recklessly disregarding the risk that a child is capable of gaining access, if a child uses the firearm and causes death or serious bodily injury.
Prescribes criminal penalties for violations of firearms provisions covered by this Act.
Directs the Attorney General to: (1) establish and maintain a firearm injury information clearinghouse; (2) conduct continuing studies and investigations of firearm-related deaths and injuries; and (3) collect and maintain current production and sales figures of each licensed manufacturer.
Authorizes the Attorney General to certify state firearm licensing or record of sale systems.



More:

Image

One day into the 111th session of Congress was all it took for Illinois Democrat and former Black Panther, Bobby Rush, to take a run on a new measure of gun control. Problem is, quite a few don’t like the language—in particular, the part about “anyone wishing to purchase, own or possess a ‘qualifying firearm’ would have to be licensed by the state or the federal government in a licensing program managed by the Attorney General.”

“I might be a gun rights advocate,” says Larry Pratt, the Executive Director of the Gun Owners of America, “but anyone with any sense, or any respect for the Constitution at all, has to bristle at proposed legislation that wants to place our Bill of Rights in the hands of one man.”

Pratt is available for interviews to comment on this political move, and the foreshadowing he fears it may represent in a President Obama/Speaker Pelosi Washington tag team.

With an eye on the bill’s details that require redundant personal identification, a release of personal health records to the Attorney General and other unnecessary, intrusive measures, Pratt and other gun rights proponents find it a harsh pill to swallow, and a disturbing political double standard that shows a government more preoccupied with its own citizens than foreign enemies.

“What I find frighteningly ironic,” adds Pratt, “is the bill’s mandate requiring gun owners apply for a federal firearms I.D. card. Isn’t this the Party that, together with the ACLU, had a tirade over the proposal of a post-9/11 national I.D. card?”

In 1969, Rush himself served six months in prison for an illegal weapons conviction. Currently, the bill has no cosponsors, has not been scheduled for a committee hearing and, if it were to get as far, would likely have a difficult time passing in the Senate. Nonetheless, with a heavily left-leaning D.C. right now, folks like Pratt are taking nothing for granted.  (Special Guests)


Related:  The "Make My Day" law, (Castle Doctrine?) is up for review in at least one State, see Skunkfeathers article here.

Other news:

Democrats Look to Muzzle Conservative Radio

Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow says she wants hearings on “accountability” in radio, suggesting Democrats are eying a return of the Fairness Doctrine.

During an interview with Stabenow, syndicated radio host Bill Press said conservatives should not be the only voices heard on talk radio and asked the Michigan lawmaker: “So, is it time to bring back the Fairness Doctrine?”

Stabenow responded: “I think it’s absolutely time to pass a standard. Now, whether it’s called the Fairness Standard, whether it’s called something else — I absolutely think it’s time to be bringing accountability to the airwaves.(continue at NewsMax)




January 27, 2009

Ammunition Accountability Act

In short, the Ammunition Accountability Act would require the manufacturer to code all ammunition in a database on every ammunition sale.  Doing so would track how much ammunition was purchased, by whom and what calibers. All ammunition that is not coded must be destroyed. The provisions of this bill would also charge gun owners an additional 5-cent tax on every round.   This has been tried in the past, but with Democrats in the majority it may have a chance this time.

While a federal law is being considered by proponents of such laws, gun owners in individual states are witnessing what's referred to as Ammunition Accountability Acts being pushed through they're state legislatures by impatient lawmakers. 

Ammunition Accountability, a liberal gun control organization, has developed sample legislation to achieve its purposes and reports that versions of it have been introduced in the legislatures of Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Washington, according to John Snyder. [snip]

  ...  another attempt to chip away at the 2nd Amendment, it is just plain wrong. Since the 2nd Amendment defines a citizens "right" to defend themselves, with a gun, it clearly does not address ammunition.  [snip]

"[Lawmakers] should ignore the media hype on the firearms issue and pay attention to what the public – their constituents – are saying on the matter,” gun rights expert John M. Snyder stated.

“According to an August poll conducted by Zogby International for Associated Television News, the American public rejects the notion that new gun control laws are needed by a two-to-one margin,” Snyder continued.

“Maybe the House of Representatives should have taken a reading of public opinion on this issue before rushing headlong without a roll call vote to pass a bill before the recess,” said Snyder, who is a firearms advisor for the National Association of Chiefs of Police.   (News With Views)


"No later than January 1, 2011, all non­coded ammunition for the calibers listed in this act, whether owned by private citizens or retail outlets, shall be disposed."  (USAvsUS.info)



 Ithica Journal states "
a national crusade known as the Ammunition Accountability Act is suddenly a legitimate threat.":

 ... mandate the engraving of a unique serial number on the base of each handgun and “assault weapon” bullet, and an identical number on the cartridge's case. The act calls for dealers of this “encoded ammunition” to record the purchaser's name, birthdate, drivers license number, etc.

All non-encoded ammunition must be disposed of prior to Jan. 1, 2011. The database and other expenses involved would be paid for by a special tax of a half-cent per round of ammunition sold.



The Ammunition Accountability site, which is pushing for this legislation, is here.  They provide reasons why they believe this act should become law:

About Us

Ammunition Accountability is a newly forming group of ammunition coding technology supporters.  Our group includes gun crime victims, industry representatives, law enforcement, public officials, public policy experts, and more. We are working together to pass legislation to make ammunition coding technology a reality.

Ammunition coding technology works by laser etching the back of each bullet with an alpha-numeric serial number.  Then when a potential criminal purchases a box of 9mm cartridges, the box of ammunition and the bullets’ coding numbers would be connected to the purchaser in a statewide database.  When a bullet is found at a crime scene, the code on the bullet can be read with a simple magnifying glass and then be run through a statewide database to determine who purchased the ammunition and where, providing a valuable investigative lead. 






See Tennessee House Bill 3245 and Senate Bill 3395 here.


Get busy spreading the word on this my friends.


January 25, 2009

National Right-To-Carry Reciprocity Bill Introduced

 

From the NRA:

U.S. Representatives Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) and Rick Boucher (D-Va.), recently introduced H.R. 197-- the "National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2009"--a bill that would provide national recognition for valid state Right-to-Carry licensees. 

The bill would allow any person with a valid carry permit or license issued by a state, to carry a concealed firearm in any other state if the permit holder meets certain criteria.  In states that issue permits, a state's laws governing where concealed firearms may be carried would apply within its borders. In states that do not issue carry permits, a federal standard would apply.  The bill would not create a federal licensing system; it would simply require the states to recognize each other's carry permits, just as they recognize drivers' licenses. 

Senator John Thune (R-S.D.) is expected to introduce the Senate companion bill in the near future.  Rep. Stearns has introduced such legislation since 1995. 

Please be sure to contact your U.S. Representative at (202) 225-3121, and urge him or her to cosponsor and support H.R. 197! 

For more information, please visit

www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?ID=189.

January 20, 2009

“Hope is not a strategy…”

“Hope is not a strategy…”

By R.J. Godlewski
© January 20, 2009, All Rights Reserved
(Right Truth Exclusive)


    A few fellow classmates of mine at American Military University, when analyzing the historical threat generated from Islam, spoke of the “hope” that the religion would somehow calm down, mature, or be cleansed by Muslims that are more moderate. My instructor rebuked them saying “Hope is not a strategy” and then challenged us to come up with a strategy to fight such ideologies. I accepted that challenge, as much as I could, but that’s not what this commentary is about.

    Hope is a wonderful feeling, the yearning for expectations and anticipation as my archaic dictionary tells. It is an emotion that I feel whenever I hear the B-52’s wail out Sugar Shack or AC/DC crank up their exploits about the woman that shook them “all night long”. Yet, hope is not an action any more than prayer is a strategy. God might work in mysterious ways, but our own personal involvement dictates responsibility, effort, and resilience.

    We now find ourselves at the dawn of the Obama presidency and the entire nation is buzzing with, you guessed it, hope. Expectations are high throughout the planet. Everyone is warm and fuzzy with anticipation for “change”. Nearly everyone is voicing “hope” that “Obama succeeds as president”. Not me. Personally, I’d like to see the man fail catastrophically – it would teach a gullible nation a lesson or two regarding the deification of someone with very little practical experience. No, I will not hope that the Obama Administration succeeds. I merely pray that our nation survives.

    This “One nation, under God” already has a Lord to watch over it. Our role is to roll our sleeves up and work hard to better ourselves, our community, and our world. Christ hints at this when He says “We are unprofitable servants; we have done what we were obliged to do” (Luke 17:10). In other words, we won’t get off our fat asses and do something to improve the world unless we either make a fantastic amount of money for it, gain recognition for the effort, or are forced to do so at the literal point of a barrel.

    When we say, “hope”, we are merely saying “demand”. Our pleas for hope from the Obama Administration are thus demands that he somehow turns our economy around and provides us with more for less. Simply put, we want him to solve our problems for us and, here’s the catcher, to improve our “hopes” we’ve elevated him to a deity. After all, we remind ourselves, God can do anything. Unfortunately, Barack Obama is nothing more than a man and an inexperienced one at that. Stratfor speaks of three immediate issues for Obama: the economy, Afghanistan, and Russia. They should keep him busy for the next four years.

    I do not know what Mr. Obama’s successes will be – all presidents achieve “something”— but I know what his failures could be. First, he cannot increase any taxes, even against the “villainous” wealthy five-percent. It never ceases to amaze me that there are still people out there who think that income redistribution or higher taxes work. We hear of the “trickle down” economics of Republicans, but Democrats force a “trickle up” tax system: the rich abandon investments, write off their losses, and the rest of us “trickle up” our meager taxes to cover the burden. Everyone suffers.

    The second mistake that Mr. Obama will make is to further unrestricted abortions. Pissing off workers is bad enough, but this man wants to get God angry too. It would be one thing if he claimed to be an atheist, but any “Christian” who supports abortion in any way, shape, or form is worse than all of those Islamic terrorists running around blowing up weddings and beheading tourists. The man who oozes “hope” tries to deny life itself. Now that’s a warm, cozy feeling…

    The third mistake that Mr. Obama will make is to acquiesce anything to the gun control lobby. This will infuriate a substantial lobby and push many Democrats from his fold. For all of the hatred that the liberals had against President Bush, one of the main reasons the man was elected in the first place was that President Clinton presided over one of the most anti-gun administrations in U.S. history. It will also kill a multi-billion dollar industry and lay off hundreds of thousands of workers. And for what? To provide people with the “hope” that they won’t be attacked by someone who doesn’t give a rat’s ass about our laws in the first place? Yeah, right.

    The fourth mistake that Mr. Obama will make is simply to institutionalize labor on the national level. If unions were so productive and valuable, they would not be in decline today. One only needs to gaze upon Europe for a visual aid as to their outmoded nature. America is the land of the individual and being forced to pay someone for a job or representation at work merely profits those in control. Of course, what would you expect from a “community organizer” that somehow spent $1 Billion to acquire the presidency?

    A fifth mistake, and the final one that I will discuss, that Mr. Obama will make is to defer national interests to Europe. As Stratfor says, Europe is bound to care for itself. They will not aid us in Afghanistan or in the greater war on terror. They will not aid in our economy and, besides, Democrats are introverted when it comes to the subject. At the moment, Putin’s Russia is far more influential than our new president. If Europe is so great, why then are they under our security umbrella? America has more soldiers buried in Europe than Europe has living soldiers aiding us in the fight against our mutual enemy. Yet, they all “hope” that the Obama Administration will not act unilaterally like the Bush Administration and will be able to pull them out of their self-constructed cesspool. We should pull all of our troops and businesses out of Europe and let the Russians take over. We’d deal with two problems at the same time! I’m sure that there are many countries in Africa and South America that would love – and deserve – our aid.

    It is not right to bitch without effort, so I will still do whatever I can to contribute my own talents and efforts to this (at the moment) great nation of ours. My INERT organization will continue its unilateral battle against terrorists without relying upon the “hope” that somehow the supporters of Muhammad come to realize that their Prophet was a maniac. My Sara Ann Doss Cancer Research Center project will continue to push the need to cure cancer, not simply treat it without “hope” for a patient’s future. My Road Sailor businesses will continue to plan, produce, and distribute quality books, music, and, eventually, films so that entertainment becomes a real word again within the industry. My MEDISHIPS organization will continue its efforts to provide medical facilities and personnel to regions hard hit by war, disease, and natural disasters.

    All of my efforts are singularly ambitious. None are easy or inexpensive. However, it is not merely my “hope” that I will succeed for the benefit of my nation. It is my commitment. Whether you are a terrorist, a disease, or a period of boredom, you do not stand a chance. That, my friends, is the purpose of my life’s strategy.

January 15, 2009

Bush, America's Heroes, America's Enemies

There really is evil in the world.  Don't doubt me on this one!  "The most urgent threat he [Barack Obama] will have to deal with and other presidents will have to deal with is an attack on our homeland." said President George W. Bush in his fairwell address to the nation tonight.  President Bush, for all his faults, recognized the real threat to the United States on September 11, 2001 and acted accordingly.  He put in place the tools that, if left in place, will continue to keep America safe.

Over the past seven years, a new Department of Homeland Security has been created.  The military, the intelligence community, and the FBI have been transformed.  Our Nation is equipped with new tools to monitor the terrorists’ movements, freeze their finances, and break up their plots.  And with strong allies at our side, we have taken the fight to the terrorists and those who support them.   [snip]

There is legitimate debate about many of these decisions.  But there can be little debate about the results.  America has gone more than seven years without another terrorist attack on our soil ... [snip]

And we must never let down our guard  (full text here)

Unlike the Democrats who parade victims before us, or use them as props behind them, President Bus introduces heroes to the world:


We see America’s character in Dr. Tony Recasner, a principal who opened a new charter school from the ruins of Hurricane Katrina.  We see it in Julio Medina, a former inmate who leads a faith-based program to help prisoners returning to society.  We see it in Staff Sergeant Aubrey McDade, who charged into an ambush in Iraq and rescued three of his fellow Marines. 

We see America’s character in Bill Krissoff, a surgeon from California. His son Nathan, a Marine, gave his life in Iraq.  When I met Dr. Krissoff and his family, he delivered some surprising news:  He told me he wanted to join the Navy Medical Corps in honor of his son.  This good man was 60 years old – 18 years above the age limit. 


Terrorism continues to be a threat, but the form of that threat has changed somewhat.  The enemy now has the backing of much of the Western media, and the Western governments are putting leaders in place who are weak and sympathetic to the enemy, even here in America.  Average citizens can look to have their personal rights weakened or taken away.  At no other time in history has personal responsibility been so important when it comes to individual safety.  I fear we may not be able to depend on the new US president and his appointees to make the right decisions:


Leader of Group Linked to Terror Will Deliver Inauguration Day Prayer at National Cathedral,  (Bob McCarty Writes)


Ingrid Mattson, the first woman president of the Islamic Society of North America, will offer a prayer at the National Cathedral on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20.  It’s newsworthy, because her organization has admitted to having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas and was, according to Jihad Watch, an unindicted co-conspirator in the same Hamas funding case that named the Council on American-Islamic Relations as a Muslim Brotherhood group.  (continue reading)

OBAMA CHOICE FOR ATTY GENERAL NO FAN OF SECOND AMENDMENT: Gun Owners Of America Opposing This Nomination Strongly And Publicly

Image

Based on past statements and positions, gun owners are very concerned about what the upcoming Barack Obama presidency will mean for 2nd Amendment protections.

Executive Director of Gunowners of America (GOA), Larry Pratt is no exception. Of particular interest is Eric Holder, Barack Obama’s choice for Attorney General. As you can tell from the statement from GOA below, Pratt does not consider Holder to be in support of the second amendment.


STATEMENT FROM GOA ON ERIC HOLDER
Barack Obama is wasting no time poking a sharp stick in the eyes of gun owners.

The incoming President's choice for U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, is an anti-gun extremist who has assailed gun owners since his days in the Bill Clinton administration.

Holder, who served as Deputy Attorney General from 1997-2001, supports a 3-day waiting period for handgun purchases, one-gun-a-month rationing, licensing and registration of all gun owners, mandatory so-called smart gun technology, a lifetime gun ban for certain juvenile offenses and regulating gun shows out of existence.

As Janet Reno's top deputy, Eric Holder was the go to guy on gun control issues. In a 1999 statement, Holder told members of Congress not to cave in to "the special interest that value the cold hard steel of guns more than the lives of children, neighbors and police officers," and urged them to pass legislation that would have destroyed the gun show industry.

Gun Owners of America members flooded the Congress with postcards and e-mails and stopped Holder's gun control plan.

In 2000, Holder was instrumental in the Clinton Administration's effort to strong-arm firearms manufacturers into voluntarily accepting regulations that had stalled in the Congress.

In a brazen legislation-by-extortion plot, the federal government filed suit against gun makers but offered to drop the suit if the companies would bow to the administration's demands.

Again, GOA and its members took the lead in opposing Holder and the Clinton Administration and slowed down implementation of the agreement until it completely went away when Clinton left office.

One company went along with the deal but after intense pressure from gun owners, no others joined the unholy alliance.

After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, in an op-ed in the Washington Post, Holder pushed for more gun control and greater restrictions on gun shows, even though the terrorists were armed with box cutters that could be purchased at any hardware store.

Just last year, Holder joined Janet Reno and 11 other former Justice Department officials in an amicus brief before the Supreme Court arguing in favor of the gun ban in Washington D.C.

The Holder/Reno brief also took the position that the Second Amendment protects a collective government right, not an individual right.

GOA and its members have defeated Eric Holder and his agenda in the past, and we need to do it again. The Holder nomination is subject to Senate confirmation in a vote which is set to occur at any time.

Gun Owners of America has asked all members of the U.S. Senate to reject this anti-Second Amendment activist.

Now we're urging gun owners across the country to contact their own Senators and insist that they vote "NO" on Eric Holder.  (Special Guests)



MUSLIMS FIGHT FOR “PEACE”: Pro-Palestine Rallies Around the World Miss the Point

ImageIn Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington—to focus on just a few U.S. cities for a moment—protests against the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in Gaza the past few days have been mostly relegated to absurdly ironic placards comparing Israel to Nazi Germany.

But in the progressive European Union, of all places, Arab demonstrations for peace have turned violent. Offering your audience a unique and insightful perspective is Walid Shoebat, a former Palestinian terrorist, now U.S. citizen and Christian, who finds these “peaceful” movements turned into assaults hardly surprising.

“You’re talking about a culture of war among the Arabs that dates back thousands of years,” says Shoebat. “Peace is generally a concept they have difficulty grasping.”

In Paris, a Jewish teenage girl was mobbed by a group of protestors who vowed she would “pay for Israel’s acts.” In both France and Sweden, Jewish monuments were firebombed. And in London, during a Palestinian rally bordering on a riot, Arab supporters chased police while calling them “[expletive] cowards” and shouting “Allahu Akhbar.” (Visit http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/01/uk-muslim-peace-protesters-chase-police.html to watch the video.)

Meanwhile, on the World Wide Web, an Islamist site posts a hit list of prominent British Jews.

“Think about it,” adds Shoebat, “Since giving Gaza back to the Palestinians in 2005, Israel has suffered some 6,000 indiscriminate rocket attacks into its civilian neighborhoods. When are Israeli concessions enough for the likes of Hamas to accept peace?”  (Special Guests)

Those supporters of Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, and related terror groups, are here in the US right now.

Yes America, there is evil in the world and it wants to assimilate or destroy you.  There is no doubt.


January 10, 2009

Voices Crying in the Wilderness...

My friend A.C. at Fore-Left expresses my sentiments today perfectly:  "Hard to write anything today. Sometimes it seems like the events of the day become so overwhelming as to prevent even sarcasm or satire or, God forbid, thoughtful insight."  Concentrating on one subject has been hard for me this week.  There is so much going on, so much news and so many facts to share, and so little time. 

A.C. quotes Mustang at Social Sense, who says "
The American sheeple are following along because they well understand by now that it doesn’t matter what “we the people” really think; the government elite will do whatever it wants no matter what we say, even when it is well-said."  American Conservatives are like voices crying in the wilderness and no one is listening.  We feel helpless.  We know the answer is to get rid of the Washington as usual crowd, start from the bottom and vote in new blood.  There are problems with that too, because it take big bucks and lots of free time devoted to getting these people elected, and did I say lots of money???

What can average Americans do?    What are most Americans hoping for at this point?  A.C. provides the answer... it seems all we can do is  "
to survive this near unsurvivable crisis created by government, which only a government can fix."

We're suffering from knowing what the right answer is, but realizing that no one is listening.  No one.

Those of us wandering in the wilderness also suffer from knowing that everything happening here in the United States of America domestically is weakening us from the threat 'out there', because the geniuses in Washington fail to acknowledge who the enemy is and fail to see how they are enabling that enemy.  Who is the enemy?  Islam.

The unnamed enemy is Islam. Not some small fanatical group of Islamists, not some zealous band of religious extremists, but just plain, old-fashioned Islam. Islam has unequivocally declared war on the infidels. And we have unequivocally decided to deny the existence of this declaration. By conveniently defining this to be some amorphous "War on Terror", we have deluded ourselves into thinking that it is something altogether different, something far less dangerous and pervasive than it really is. We have denied the existence of the monster who threatens us, and therefore we firmly believe that the monster ceases to exist.  (by Roger Gardner of RadarSite, posting at Wake Up America.  Continue reading)


The title of Roger's article above is "We Are Losing The War Against Islam".  The question is "Why are we losing?".  We have the geniuses in Washington to thank.  Again we in the wilderness seem helpless to make them see the error of their ways.

 Our friend the Curmudgeon from Eternity Road discusses the situation like no other can:


Governments are instruments of force, nominally created to defend the order and norms of society against invasion and predation. However, like all human-peopled institutions of any sort, they possess an internal dynamic: to survive and grow. Government's method of increase is to prey upon those it supposedly serves: taxation, expropriation, and abridgments of individuals' rights.

Of course, to persuade its subjects to accept its ever-accelerating predation, a government must convince them of several propositions:

  1. That the threats they face are best combated by government;
  2. That they, as private individuals and voluntary organizations, have neither the right nor the ability to defend themselves;
  3. That the costs of government, both in money and abridgments of freedom, are fully justified by its "services" to its subjects;
  4. That this is the traditional, universal state of society, such that even the suggestion of departure from it is unacceptably radical;
  5. That there are no satisfactory alternatives -- that this is the way it must be.

(In point of fact, all those propositions are subsumed by the last one.) (continue reading at Eternity Road)

I've said it before and I'll say it again:  I long for some true Conservatives to stand up in Congress and tell it like it is.  Because until that happens, the situation will not change.  They need to stand upn against these bailouts, against the far Left who, if allowed to have their way, will continue down the path of making us helpless and dependent on Government, who will only disappoint us.

Below find some news, if you can stomach it.


Watch Obama commercial they don't want you to see
Fox, CNN, MSNBC refuse ads questioning Barack's eligibility, WND

Barack Obama's campaign officials and transition office repeatedly have rejected reporters' requests for comment on questions raised over his lack of documentation regarding his birth and the resulting concerns over his eligibility to be president. Now a number of media organizations apparently don't want questions raised either.

WND columnist Janet Porter told WND she found that out when her organization, Faith2Action.org, tried to purchase airtime to publicize information about the eligibility concerns.

She told WND that national networks that refused to sell her time for a 60-second commercial included CNBC, MSNBC, Headline News, CNN and Fox. Washington, D.C., outlets for the same organizations did the same.

The ad to be broadcast already is available on YouTube, and also is embedded here:

"Heard rumors about Barack Obama's citizenship? These are the facts," the ad states.


Children of Hamas, via Anti-Mulla:

They are still innocents but with their innocence being ripped from their souls and minds by their palestinian mentors and Hamas trainers. None of that is Israeli doing, nor a way to a peaceful future. And currently no future at all for so many of them.



Response to a bunch of photos (some unclear as to whether the “oppressor” is an Israeli) Emailed out by a group of Iranians protesting attacks on Gaza.


See:

Internal Divisions of Hamas,
By Volkhard Windfuhr in Cairo, Spiegel (hat tip Marcus Wilder, The Naive Abroad)

The Egyptian-French cease-fire proposal for the Gaza Strip remains on the table. Hamas, though, is divided. One camp is calling for a decisive battle while others continue to negotiate. And it remains uncertain which side will prevail.

December 17, 2008

Christmas Thoughts

In one week Christians will be celebrating the birth of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.  That's what Christmas is, that's what it is all about.  Too many people have forgotten why we have this holiday.  Every religion I know has it's own holidays and has the freedom and right to celebrate those holidays as they see fit.  Not so any more with Christmas, we might offend someone. 

In an article "Onward Christian Soldiers", the author Liz Hunt makes the statement "
At the core of Christianity is a force for good and we should not forget that."  My first thought was, what an odd statement... what an odd thing that someone has to make that statement.  The author points out incidents in the UK that mirror events here in the US:

 ...  rewriting carols to reflect the tenor of our times – hence the uplifting inclusion of hoodies, single mothers, Aids sufferers, and lottery losers in a version of The Twelve Days of Christmas by the Rev George Fisher from Lichfield.  ...

The Rev Stephen Coulter has gone one better and banned O Little Town of Bethlehem from his services in Blandford Forum, Dorset, because, he claims, it fails to reflect the little town’s recent troubles ...

In Essex, a school choir was forced to pull out of the Corringham Winter Festival because its programme of carols was “too religious”.   (continue reading)


Muslims get prayer rooms and foot bathes in public airports, schools, etc.  Yet Christians cannot display a nativity scene -- a scene of the baby Jesus, for whom CHRISTmas is named.    Snowmen, Christmas trees, light displays, angels, all seem to be on the politically correct and green grinch bad list.  Some stores decorate for Happy Holidays and employees won't say Merry Christmas.

Banner1


As the Christmas Holiday nears, imprisoned border agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean will likely spend it without their families.

Image While the two agents share a common bond, so do their familiesGun Owners Foundation (GOF) already has filed not one, but two friend of the court briefs for Ignacio Ramos and Jose Antonio Compean. In those briefs, GOF has pointed out to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that the 10-year conviction of the two agents is for a crime that doesn't exist.

We have called on President George W. Bush to free these men immediately.

Banner2



AL GORE: NORTH POLAR HAS FIVE YEARS TO LIVE! While In Germany Last Week, Former V.P. Says North Polar Ice Cap Will Be Gone Soon

Image

An “Allegory” is a visual symbol representing an abstract idea. It’s also a word that may sufficiently explain Al Gore’s argument that Santa will have to think about relocating.

Rob Roselli is an average American citizen with a civil engineering background that was utilized to unmask the fake science of the scam radical environmental movement and the real intentions of the environmental movement; a group our illustrious new leader embraces. Today, he has reached a point of such concern for his country that it has assumed “top priority” status.

Roselli is convinced that the entire climate change movement is a scam with a much bigger agenda. “People need to open their eyes,” he says, “Never has their been better time for the old Wizard of Oz movie line, ‘pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.’”

“Besides,” Roselli says, “all the evidence is showing that the earth has actually been cooling for quite some time now. Mr. Gore better start thinking about getting himself a flamethrower if he wants to bolster his argument.”


Banner3


Parents I know shop wisely for their children, looking for safe toys, toys that teach and build character, physical and mental growth.  But not all parents are this responsible. 

The Nation -- For the second straight year, HealthyToys.org is highlighting test results for more than 1,500 toys and children's products. Researchers at the Ecology Center, a Michigan-based nonprofit, tested more than 1,500 popular children's toys for lead, cadmium, arsenic, PVC and other harmful chemicals in time for this year's holiday shopping season. The results are sobering: One in three toys tested were found to contain "medium" or "high" levels of chemicals of concern.  (continue reading)



The greatest gift ever given is the gift of life from Jesus Christ.  We celebrate the fact that he left Heaven, came to earth, was born as a human baby, lived a perfect life, and then gave that life in death on the cross -- paying the price for our sins.  No gift compares.

GIVING THE GIFT OF VIOLENCE: Are Parents Paying Enough Attention This Holiday Season?


Image

Ignorance is bliss . . . if you don’t mind your child playing a video game driven by death, criminal behavior and “health boosts” that involve a virtual visit with a prostitute.

Such is a glimpse inside the immensely popular Grand Theft Auto video game series, one of a growing number of shockingly violent selections targeted for stockings this year. Art Ally is president of the Timothy Plan family of mutual funds—an investment firm that only buys into companies with quantifiable moral and ethical standards—and he’s prepared to sound the alarm for the parents in your audience.

“It’s not that moms and dads universally don’t care about their children’s exposure to the drug use, murder and mayhem in video games today,” explains Ally. “Many of them just don’t know about it.”

Ally points to data that shows the dynamic of parental discretion is shifting right under our feet. While 88 percent of parents report regularly supervising their children's use of television, only 48 percent report regularly supervising their children's use of video games. No wonder. After all, this can be especially difficult when one third of all children living in a home with video games have a video game system in their own bedrooms. 

Banner4 

Let's make a point this Christmas season to remember the reason for the season.  Let us praise and worship our Lord.  As Liz Hunt said, "Christianity is a force for good and we should not forget that."  We should never let others forget this either.


December 16, 2008

On Bill of Rights Day, Imagine the D.C. Gun Law in 1775

On Bill of Rights Day, Imagine the D.C. Gun Law in 1775,
by Stephen P. Halbrook, Ph.D., J.D.,


Today is the United States’ Bill of Rights Day, but District of Columbia residents are second-class citizens when it comes to the Second Amendment. President-elect Barack Obama certainly does not support it. When I filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court this June supporting the respondent in District of Columbia v. Heller on behalf of 55 senators, the senate president, and 250 representatives, Obama declined. And his voting record in the Illinois legislature and the U.S. Congress has been as hostile to American gun owners as King George III was in 1775. What’s in store for Second Amendment rights come January?

Imagine that at Lexington and Concord, British Major John Pitcairn does not shout “Disperse you Rebels—Damn you, throw down your Arms and disperse!”…and that the shot heard ‘round the world is not fired. Imagine that instead he reads to the assembled colonists the following decree by British Commander-in-Chief General Thomas Gage, modeled of course after the newly-minted 2008 District of Columbia gun law:

  1. Bans “assault weapons,” defined by a long list of various rifles, pistols, and shotguns, and concludes with the catch-all: “Any firearm that the Chief may designate as an assault weapon by rule.” Anyone who disobeys will be imprisoned.

  2. Requires all non-banned firearms to be registered with the Chief, who promises never to confiscate them—unless you forget to register them, that is—and “registration certificates shall expire three years after the date of issuance unless renewed.”

  3. A non-banned pistol can be registered but only “for use in self-defense within that person’s home.” You cannot defend yourself outside the home. “The Chief shall require any registered pistol to be submitted for a ballistics identification procedure and shall establish a reasonable fee for such procedure.” Oh, and only one pistol can be registered in a thirty-day period.

  4. Within two years—1777 for the colonists, 2010 for D.C. residents—you will go to prison if you have a pistol that is not “microstamp ready” or is an “unsafe pistol” as determined by weirdoes in the futuristic state of California.

  5. Knapsacks with more than ten rounds of ammunition are banned as “large capacity ammunition feeding devices.” Essentially, you will be arrested if you have eleven or more rounds.

Of course the “Chief” is the Chief of Police, and these quotes came directly from the new law. Imagine that the colonists reverently surrendered their “assault weapons” and sought to register their non-banned arms and pay the Chief his “reasonable fee.” Imagine that our founders were sheepish wimps who remained subservient to royal tyranny instead of demanding the American Revolution. Imagine that two centuries later we delegated all power to the California legislature and that in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), D.C. won instead of lost.

Thankfully, that was not the case. The Supreme Court ruled against D.C. and held its handgun ban to be in violation of the Second Amendment’s “right of the people to keep and bear arms.” But with Obama’s recent appointment of Eric Holder as his attorney general and D.C.’s determination to leave its citizens helpless against the criminals the police can’t control, history shows you can’t hold your breath waiting for others to protect your rights. It seems the colonists at Lexington and Concord had it right.


Stephen P. Halbrook, Ph.D., J.D., is Research Fellow at The Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif., and author of the book, The Founders' Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms, as well as the books, That Every Man Be Armed (Independent Institute) and Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Right to Bear Arms.



Also from The Independent Institute:

Lessons on the Battlefield Need to Be Learned at a Higher Level, by Ivan Eland

December 12, 2008

GUN RIGHTS GROUP TAKES ACTION TO HAVE IMPRISONED BORDER AGENTS RELEASED: Court Briefs Say Ramos And Compean Convicted Of Crime That Doesn’t Exist

President George W. Bush:  FREE RAMOS AND COMPEAN NOW!



<p>Special Guests: Talk Radio Guests;Radio Talk Show Guests; Radio Publicity, Promotion, PR</p>
GUN RIGHTS GROUP TAKES ACTION TO HAVE IMPRISONED BORDER AGENTS RELEASED: Court Briefs Say Ramos And Compean Convicted Of Crime That Doesn’t Exist

Image

(Special Guests)

Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) already has filed not one, but two friend of the court briefs for Ignacio Ramos and Jose Antonio Compean. In those briefs, GOF has pointed out to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that the 10-year conviction of the two agents is for a crime which doesn't exist.

Gun Owners of America Executive Director and President Larry Pratt is available for interviews.

The two agents were convicted of the "Discharge of a Firearm in Relation to a Crime of Violence" -- something which is not an offense, rather it is a sentencing enhancement after the government has established illegal gun possession, use or carrying.

Of course, if the Feds had gone for that kind of charge, they would have run into the problem that the agents were required to possess, use and carry guns on them while on duty. That is why the US Attorney, Johnny Sutton, went for, and succeeded, in making up an offense that would not force him to explain away that the agents are required to be armed.

One of the reasons the Border Patrol requires agents to be armed is so they can use their guns against armed drug smugglers such as Osvaldo Aldrete.

Even if the Supreme Court reverses this injustice done to Ramos and Compean, they could expect to sit in jail for upwards of another two years -- for a crime that was impossible for them to commit.

GOF was a friend of the court in a similar case before the Supreme Court. Our position was upheld nine-to-nothing. It involved a drug dealer who took a gun in payment for a bag of dope. The Feds gave him many extra years because he supposedly had "used" a gun in a crime. The Supreme Court agreed that such a view was ridiculous and clearly not the intent of the law. The Fifth Circuit has simply overlooked these fatal flaws in the government's case.

George Bush is thinking about his legacy. We have a chance to convince him that his legacy is on the verge of staining his reputation with the miscarriage of justice perpetrated by the federal prosecutor, Johnny Sutton. Keep in mind that Sutton lied to the trial court and to the appeals court about Aldrete's connections with the drug trade. He also concealed from the jury that he was paying Aldrete for his testimony against the agents.

Hopefully, President Bush does not want to be known as one who stood by while innocent men -- and the wives and children -- suffered because of a blatant injustice.

All gun owners should be alarmed at what the government has done to these two agents. If they will do this to police officers, we cannot assume they will treat the rest of the population any better. The two GOF briefs are at:

http://www.gunowners.com/amicus10.pdf
http://www.gunowners.com/amicus14.pdf 


Welcome

Translate by Google

Search Right Truth with Google Search


  • Google

    WWW
    righttruth.typepad.com

Author

  • Debbie Hamilton
Subscribe

Feeds

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

The Watcher's Council



Google Page Rank

BlogRankers


  • BlogRankers.com

Wikio Blogs

  • Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Politics

Blogged

Right Truth Mosaic


Important Information

Grab Me For Your Site

Book Club Now Reading

Jerusalem Post


  • Vote for Right Truth articles

AutoPinger

  • Blog: Right Truth - Get your quick ping button at autopinger.com!

World Blog Archive

  • Blog RSS/Atom Feed Aggregator and Syndicate

Blogroll Me

I support Israel

Thank You Troops

Knife and Multi-Tool Website

Pledge to Survive

Patient Evil

Disclaimer


  • This blog is an exercise in the author's First Amendment Rights as pertaining to Free Speech with all the protections as afforded & granted by the Constitution of the United States of America. The blog owner is not responsible for content of sites linking to this blog or sites that this blog links to. Opinions quoted on this blog or left as comments on this blog, do not necessarily represent the opinions of the blog owner. Opinions included in articles written by anyone other than the blog owner, do not necessarily represent the opinions of the blog owner. If you are offended by anything written, quoted, excerpted, referenced, linked to ... on this blog: Then go somewhere else.


  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF

blogroll

Site Meter

Crescent of Betrayal Blogroll

Tennessee ConserVOLiance

Southern Blog Federation Blogroll

Webloggin

Freedom's Zone Blogroll

Jihadi Du Jour

  • Who wants to kill us and why!
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2005

Feeds