Right Truth

Marrying Your Horse

By Kevin O'Neil

Well, here we are again, another charming variation on the evil Jew canard. Whatever it is, from famines and poverty, to wars and pestilence, the Jew is to blame.
 
A UKIP Parliamentary candidate who rejoices in the name of Anna-Marie Crampton has been suspended, pending an investigation, to the credit of UKIP leader, Nigel Farage.  Her misdeed? She aired the opinion on a conspiracist site, 'Secrets of the Fed', that there are two types of Jew; what she terms 'the real Jew' and 'the Zionist Jew', aka 'the Rothschild Jew'. Apparently she loves the one and despises the other with an undying hatred.
 
So far so good, not very promising, but we'll let it go.

 

However, she then descends Dante's gloomy stairway from the ridiculous into the airless realm of the obscene: Into the eternal darkness, into fire and into ice. 

 

She claims: "Holocaust means a sacrifice by fire. Only the Zionists could sacrifice their own in the gas chambers."  And the reason they did this?  So that the world would "feel so guilty and outraged....that a Treaty would be signed to create the State of Israel as we know it today."  She maintains that the evil "Rothschild Jews" facilitated, nay, succeeded in gassing, shooting, hanging and disposing of the remains of 6 million so-called "real Jews", a million and a half of whom were children, so that a tiny nation could be established in the most violent area of the world and in an area which has virtually no natural resources whatsoever!  6 million innocents to gain this? And the indecent concept that these mortal souls were really human sacrifices offered up by their fellow Jews!  The mind may reel in horror but the heart sickens at such an outrageous proposal. On her Facebook page she reaffirms, "It was thanks to them (the Rothschild Jews) that 6 million Jews were murdered in the War."  Could "thanks" be something of a Freudian slip? I hope not.
 
Now, in case we feel disturbed by her indelicate outburst, she goes on to assure us that she is not anti-Semitic at all but that she is anti-Zionist. This, of course, is a horse of a very different colour, isn't it?  Isn't it?  I think not. Sam Westrop, director of Stand for Peace, said, "Time after time, conspiracy and anti-Zionist sentiment is revealed to be nothing more than thinly-veiled anti-Semitism." Hear, hear.

 

Unsurprisingly, she doesn't tell us how to distinguish between the evil, mass-murdering "Rothschild Jew" who will stop at nothing to achieve his ends, and the benign, Tevye-type, "real Jew," nothing obvious to help us recognise the counterfeit from the real, the malign from the harmless. This is a grave oversight, just when she could have done us all a favour, her batteries run low.  I have to presume that successfully distinguishing between the Jews is like the old adage about identifying what is a weed and what a flower, cut everything down and whatever grows again is a weed. This appears to be her line of thought: the ones that died in the Holocaust were the good ones, the others were evil. They survived because they were evil; they were evil because they survived. I'm kidding, of course, but this woman has a peculiarly pernicious turn of mind and I wish she would keep it to herself.
 
The only certainty, then, that we have that the Jew is good, that he is "a real Jew," is that he's dead. Am I being too hard on Ms Crampton?
 
Then, what about this. The "real Jew" is the one who doesn't have the audacity to claim a place among the nations (this is what has really got under her skin), he doesn't entertain unhealthy ideas beyond his station, that he can claim that postage-stamp sized bit of land just because his forefathers happen to be the only ones to have ever really called it their homeland, and to all others it's been nothing more than a byway to better places; until the Jew came, that is, and made the desert blossom and then the passers-through decided that they wanted it.  No, the "real Jew" knows his place. The stubborn fact that he has an unbroken tradition connecting him to this particular patch of earth which goes beyond the Roman Empire, the Greek, the Babylonian, the Assyrian, the Egyptian, means nothing, nada, zip. The world will only suffer the Jew to exist with the proviso that he "wanders", and keeps on wandering; if he stops too long anywhere, he gets moved on, and that includes in Israel. We might let him stand for a while with his face to the Wall, that's about all.

 

So, dare I suggest, that these are the ones who qualify as "real Jews" to Ms Crampton: the dead and the dying. Am Yisroel Chai! (the People of Israel Live!) is an offence to this self-confessed and boastful "Democracy activist, supporting peace, justice, truth, freedom of expression." Why are these type of people always so toxic? 

 

As shocking as it may sound, I prefer the Palestinian muslim who at least has the honesty to admit that he seethes with hatred for every single Jew and will never rest until they are sent to oblivion and Israel is no more.  He has a quality which the self-congratulatory and dishonest Anna-Marie lacks. He foams with hatred for every Jew, you won't convince him that there are good Jews and bad Jews, no such nonsense crosses his mind. To him, they are all descended from "apes and pigs."  You know where you stand with this hyena, not so with the slippery Anna-Marie.

 

One more observation and I'm through.  How do such people as this woman presume to stand for high office? Her Facebook page is peppered with conspiracy nonsense such as: acts of terror are perpetrated by the FBI and CIA in order to gain control of the nation; HAARP, weather control, strikes again; GMO's; GM grain; dead sea-lions; save the Arctic; and, horror of horrors, "Israeli police use cuffed teen to calm protests." We don't expect to see this drivel on the Facebook page of somebody who aspires to a government position, however lowly. 

 

I suppose it happens to all erstwhile-great nations sooner or later. Wasn't it Caligula who married his horse or made him a Consul or something? Or did I imagine it?                 

 

Christianity declining 50pc faster than thought – as one in 10 under-25s is a Muslim - UK

A new analysis of the 2011 census shows that a decade of mass immigration helped mask the scale of decline in Christian affiliation among the British-born population – while driving a dramatic increase in Islam, particularly among the young.

It suggests that only a minority of people will describe themselves as Christians within the next decade, for first time.

Meanwhile almost one in 10 under 25s in Britain is now a Muslim.

The proportion of young people who describe themselves as even nominal Christians has dropped below half for the first time.

Initial results from the 2011 census published last year showed that the total number of people in England and Wales who described themselves as Christian fell by 4.1 million – a decline of 10 per cent.

But new analysis from the Office for National Statistics shows that that figure was bolstered by 1.2 million foreign-born Christians, including Polish Catholics and evangelicals from countries such as Nigeria.

They disclosed that there were in fact 5.3 million fewer British-born people describing themselves as Christians, a decline of 15 per cent in just a decade.

At the same time the number of Muslims in England and Wales surged by 75 per cent – boosted by almost 600,000 more foreign born followers of the Islamic faith.

While almost half of British Muslims are under the age of 25, almost a quarter of Christians are over 65.

The average age of a British Muslim is just 25, not far off half that of a British Christian.

Younger people also drove a shift away from religion altogether, with 6.4 million more people describing themselves as having no faith than 10 years earlier.

(continue reading at the Telegraph UK)

 

2013 World Press Photo of the Year was faked with Photoshop - UPDATED

Via Extreme Tech:

It turns out that the 2013 World Press Photo of the Year — the largest and most prestigious press photography award — was, in actual fact, a fake. The World Press Photo association hasn’t yet stripped the photographer, Paul Hansen, of the title, but presumably it’s just a matter of time. Rather than discussing the politics of photo manipulation, though — is it faked, or is it merely enhanced? — we’re going to look at how Hansen managed to trick a panel of experienced judges with his shooping skillz, and how a seasoned computer scientist spotted the fraudulent forgery from a mile off.

The photo, dubbed Gaza Burial, was purportedly captured on November 20, 2012 by Paul Hansen. Hansen was in Gaza City when Israeli forces retaliated in response to rocket fire from Palestinian rocket fire. The photo shows two of the casualties of the Israeli attack, carried to their funeral by their uncles. Now, the event itself isn’t a fake — there are lots of other photos online that show the children being carried through the streets of Gaza — but the photo itself is almost certainly a composite of three different photos, with various regions spliced together from each of the images, and then further manipulation to illuminate the mourners’ faces.

This revelation comes from Neal Krawetz, a forensic image analyst. There were two main

(continue reading at Extreme Tech)

Click on image to enlarge

 

UPDATE:

Experts Say Prize-Winning Photo Of Gaza Funeral Is Authentic

Read the above article and see which side you believe.

 

 

Pope Francis canonizes hundreds of martyrs beheaded for refusing to convert to Islam...

VATICAN CITY (AP) - Pope Francis on Sunday gave the Catholic church new saints, including hundreds of 15th-century martyrs who were beheaded for refusing to convert to Islam, as he led his first canonization ceremony Sunday in a packed St. Peter's Square.

The "Martyrs of Otranto" were 813 Italians who were slain in the southern Italian city in 1480 for defying demands by Turkish invaders who overran the citadel to renounce Christianity.

Their approval for sainthood was decided upon by Francis' predecessor, Benedict XVI, in a decree read at the ceremony in February where the former pontiff announced his retirement.

Shortly after his election in March, Francis called for more dialogue with Islam, and it was unclear how the granting of sainthood to the martyrs would be received. Islam is a sensitive subject for the church, and Benedict stumbled significantly in his relations with Muslims. (continue at MyWayNews, via Drudge)

.

Benghazi Whistleblower Hicks A Democrat, Voted For Hillary And Obama Twice…

Oops!

via Weasel Zippers:

Sorry libs, Hick is not a partisan hack.

Via Daily Caller:

A key Benghazi whistle-blower who has allegedly been punished for speaking out against the administration is a registered Democrat who voted for both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

The lawyer of Gregory Hicks, the former U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya who testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Wednesday, confirmed the information to The Daily Caller on Saturday.

According to the lawyer, Victoria Toensing, Hicks voted for Clinton during the 2008 primary, and for then-Illinois Sen. Obama in the 2008 general election. He again voted for Obama in 2012.

“The fact is he is a registered Democrat in Virginia. The fact is he voted for Hilary in the primary and Obama and then again for Obama,” Toensing said.

Keep reading…

.

Also see:

Geraldo: Sources Tell Him That Benghazi Was About Hiding Shoulder-Fire Missiles Running To Syria

Revisting the Diary

Via A.C. at Fore-Left:

One of the biggest stories to do with Benghazi is something CNN and Anderson Cooper know intimately but haven't followed up on--the diary:

Three days after he was killed, CNN found a journal belonging to late U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens. The journal was found on the floor of the largely unsecured consulate compound where he was fatally wounded.   CNN notified Stevens' family about the journal within hours after it was discovered and at the family's request provided it to them via a third party.  The journal consists of just seven pages of handwriting in a hard-bound book.

So, three days after the event on Friday September 14--the same day the CIA talking points were allegedly massaged by someone (according to Jay Carney,

(continue reading the article at Fore-Left)

 

 

1/3 Population of Puerto Rico Gets Food Stamps from U.S. Gov’t -- $2 Billion in 2012

(CNSNews.com) – The federal government spent more than $2 billion to provide food stamps to Puerto Rico in 2012, up to 25 percent of which is untraceable because it is distributed in cash and there is “no way to verify that funds are spent on food,” according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

The funds are used to supply more than one-third of the population of Puerto Rico with food stamps.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Nutrition Assistance Program (NAP) for Puerto Rico, an unincorporated territory of the United States, received $2 billion in Nutrition Assistance Block Grants in fiscal year 2012.

Part of that total includes funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), popularly known as the “economic stimulus,” which passed in 2009 -- $165 million in economic stimulus funds went to food stamps in Puerto Rico in FY 2012.

The $165 million in stimulus funding is on top of $494.3 million in food stamp grants to Puerto Rico from the ARRA in FY 2009 and 2010.  Stimulus spending will continue towards the program this year, with an estimated $101.3 million in FY 2013.

A spokesman from the USDA Food and Nutrition Service told CNSNews.com that, on average, 1.37 million people received food stamps in Puerto Rico each month in FY 2012. Puerto Rico has a population of 3.7 million, meaning 37 percent of Puerto Ricans are on food stamps paid by the federal government.  (continue at CNS News)

 

The Muslim Discovery of America - Review

In 2001 the great  Professor of Near Eastern Studies, Emeritus, at Princeton University, Bernard Lewis, wrote the book The Muslim Discovery of Europe, which is described as a must-read for anyone interested in Middle Eastern history and ultimately Islam's spread to Europe.

The Muslim Discovery of America is the new 2013 book by Frederick William Dame that  addresses not only the erroneous premise that Muslims, not Columbus, discovered America, but the historical reasoning behind the promotion of this lie and how America is simply the next step in the spread of an Islamic caliphate.

I highly recommend this book.

The Muslim Discovery of America is not a book you will read in a few hours, but one you will want to take time reading and keep on your bookshelf for future reference. 

As Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs notes in her Foreword to The Muslim Discovery of America, "This book is the record of a colonization."

... it is not an ordinary colonization, but it is a colonization nonetheless.  [snip]

Every citizen must now work to defend America's constitutional government and stop the Muslim colonization of America in its tracks.  Every free citizen must join this fight.

How can citizens fight if they do not know the facts, the history, the motivation, the plan, and the playbook of the enemy?  This is what makes The Muslim Discovery of America an absolute must have book.

It would be impossible for me to include all the important excerpts from the book in this short review.  However, you will see from the chapter titles the vast amount of information, history, and references that Frederick William Dame has packed into 443 pages.

Don Fredrick, author of The Obama Timeline, calls The Muslim Discovery of America a tour de force of exposition.

Mr. Dame's book arrives at a time when Muslims are aggressively trying to extend their influence around the world, either blatantly or surreptitiously. After spending an evening or two reading "The Muslim Discovery of America," the reader will better understand the tactics used by those who would not hesitate to "fundamentally transform" the American way of life of liberty to a life of submission to Shari'ah law.

It is said that politics figures very little in the book by Bernard Lewis.  That is not the case with The Muslim Discovery of America.  Politics is an important part of The Muslim Discovery of America, by Frederick William Dame.  Islam is a political system.  The book highlights Islam's Twenty Point Strategy to Undermine Democratic-Republican Governments and the Countermeasures that the United States can employ.

Again, I highly recommend this book.  The Muslim Discovery of America is a resource book, a history book, and a blueprint for what Americans can do to save this great nation.

Order your copy today, order copies for Father's Day and gifts for other family and friends.

Benghazi walls come tumbling down - updates

This post will be updated throughout the day as more information becomes available on the FACTS and events that resulted in four dead Americans and dozens more wounded and covered up by their government.  Scroll down for evening updates

Mother Of Slain Benghazi Victim Rips Hillary Clinton: "I Blame Her" (video at Real Clear Politics)

.

Father of Slain Benghazi SEAL: White House Order Was “Don’t Help Them, Let Them Die”

.

Via Drudge:

Shock testimony expected from Benghazi witnesses...
SENATOR: 'The dam is about to break'...
'Operation Smear' already underway...
Bolton: Could bring down admin...
Cheney rips 'leadership'...
Hillary in spotlight...

 

MORE:

 

 

Flashback: Obama One Week After Benghazi – “Extremely Offensive Video Directed At Mohammed And Islam” Responsible For Attack…

Shock testimony from Benghazi witnesses...
Moment-by-moment account of attack...
Emotional recollection of murders...
CONGRESSMAN: 'Death is part of life'...
Dem vows to 'protect' others at State Department...
Fourth whistleblower blocked from testifying...
SENATOR: 'Dam about to break'...
'Operation Smear' already underway...

 

 EVENING UPDATES ON HEARINGS:

 

 

Fourth Benghazi witness gagged by red tape

[dailycaller.com: 312] from BadBlue -  

 

Graphic New Video of Chris Stevens in Benghazi Hospital; Ansar Al-Sharia Credited

[soopermexican.com: 282] from BadBlue -

O’Reilly And Kirsten Powers Bash Dems For Defending Obama, Clinton In Benghazi Hearings

 

...on the Benghazi hearings in Congress today and, in particular, how much Democrats on the House committee were going out of their way to defend Hillary Clinton and President Obama. Kirsten Powers and Kate Obenshain piled on the Democrats for aiding in a potential cover-up, though Powers was a little more hesitant about calling it a cover-up, sugg...

from Mediaite

 

Cummings: I Would Say 99.99 Percent of What I Heard, I’d Heard Before

...at the Benghazi hearing already, but later admitting he had never heard several pieces of information from today. “I would say 99.99 percent of what I heard, I’ve heard before,” he said. “I basically think that the Republicans are trying to keep this issue going and not dealing with reform, which is what we want.” But two questions later, Chris ...from Free Beacon 

 

Benghazi Victim’s Father on Hillary Clinton’s Claims: ‘I Knew That She Wasn’t Telling the Truth’

...consulate in Benghazi on the the day of his son’s funeral. SEAN HANNITY: But you also learned to that the line that was fed to the American people and to you and your family, that this was related to a YouTube video, was not true, that this was spontaneous, that that was not true and never talked to Mr. Hicks, that the administration changed wha...from Free Beacon -

 

Benghazi whistleblower: 'I've been demoted' for challenging Susan Rice's claims (Joel Gehrke/Washington Examiner)

...Benghazi whistleblower: 'I've been demoted' for challenging Susan Rice's claims … Gregory Hicks, former deputy chief of mission in Benghazi, told Congress today that a State Department official began criticizing his job performance, and he was ultimately demoted, after he asked why U.S. Ambassador …from memeorandum -

 

Chaffetz: ‘Surreal’ to Hear Attempts to Obstruct Hicks from Speaking With Him

...investigate the Benghazi attack: During that trip, a lawyer from the State Department was excluded from a classified meeting because he did not have the appropriate security clearance. Following that meeting, State Department general counsel Cheryl Mills called Hicks angry, demanding a report about the meeting. “A phone call from that senior a p...from Free Beacon -  

 

Benghazi Whistleblower Says He Was Told Not To Talk To Congressmen Investigating Attack, Top Clinton Adviser Called

[weaselzippers.us: 264] from BadBlue -

-

.

 

Cursing Yourself

By Kevin O'Neil

The Report pompously entitled "The Inheritance of Abraham? A Report on the Promised Land" by the Church of Scotland, in which the committee states their opinion that the Jews have no inherent right to the Holy Land, is hopelessly flawed with faulty theology and bitter prejudice. The authors must be either ignorant or deceived or both.
 
I offer the following thoughts in response.
 
The authors' method in approaching the noble study of Biblical hermeneutics, if adopted, would make nonsense of huge swathes of both the Old and New Testaments and render the surviving texts vague and unreliable for any practical purpose. With them, words don't really mean what they say, they may even mean the opposite, we just can't be sure. The rock becomes a swamp, a shifting and untrustworthy sand.  These so-called scholars appear mortified at the suggestion that some poor souls may actually believe these things to be understood literally.  They have passed on from that primitive stage, and besides, everything is subjective, the text means whatever you decide it means, if it works for you, then fine, go for it.  A far cry from the Covenanter days of 17c Scotland.

 

I pity a church and, particularly, the ordinary people who compose such a church, that would so irresponsibly misuse God's Word and fill peoples' minds with doubts and uncertainties instead of faith and confidence. This is very serious.
 
When God says that the Land, Haaretz, will be given to Abraham's descendants, as He does in all the verses on which the authors try to cast doubt, He safeguards against the danger of spiritualising this Land by instructing Abraham to physically look north, south, east and west, and that everything he could see was included in what God meant by the Land. At another time God said, get up and walk on it, that's the Land, the place you can feel under your feet! And yet another time God gives actual geographical reference points, a sort of GPS.  The Land is modern day Israel, including Judea and Samaria (the misnamed West Bank), and a whole lot more besides.
 
When God says, as He does in most of the references given, that the Land would be given forever, it seems to elude the minds of the sophisticated ones that the Almighty meant exactly what He said and that forever means forever. It's a sad fact that human beings may not always mean what they say but we may rest assured that God has more integrity than do His creatures. The Hebrew word translated forever is olam and is defined in Strong's Dictionary as follows:  Long duration, antiquity, futurity, for ever, everlasting, evermore, perpetual, and so on. What is it that the authors of the Report don't understand here?  If they doubt that olam is forever then they must doubt the eternality of God's Kingship and the Messiah's Kingdom, for the very same word is used with respect to these also, Jer.10:10, Isa.9:7, etc. Or are we to think that their reasoning only applies to God's promise of the Land to the Jews?
 
The authors' speak derisively of a literalistic interpretation of the Word of God as though we are now too sophisticated to believe it for what it says, we must treat it, as it were, with a pinch of salt. Contemptible arrogance we call it and lacking in the true fear of God, which is the very beginning of any wisdom.
 
Regarding the attitude of the Report to the people who have cleverly adopted the name of Palestinians I hardly know where to begin, the authors' ignorance beggars belief. The following brief points are all I can manage, others have done sterling work in refuting these things from a practical and logistical point of view, their work is readily available online.

A little definition of just who the Palestinians are will be useful being as they appear to be such objects of admiration to the authors.  The Palestinians were regarding themselves as Syrians as recently as 1939 and it is well-documented that they are the descendants of any number of nations including Afghani, Algerian, Arab, Bosnian, Copt, Egyptian, and so on, almost ad infinitum.  The term Palestinian was first used in 1964 in Moscow when the PLO was established and its founding document was drafted. In fact, ironically, the name is derived from a root meaning Dividers, Penetrators or Invaders. This is all fairly elementary history. But the major point is this: the name was an invention which was made with the purpose of lending these non-indigenous people a false history and a supposed link with the land once known as Palestine. And the plan has largely worked, the UN, most of the media, and these authors have swallowed it hook line and sinker.

 

I would hope that the authors are at least aware that the land known for 1400 years as Israel suddenly became known as Palestine because the Roman Emperor, Hadrian, sought to erase all Jewish/Israeli connection to the area after their revolt in 135AD. The actual name chosen was Syria Palaestina, and was a vindictive reference to that inveterate enemy of Israel, the Philistines, a sea-faring people who were of Hellenistic origin, not Arab.  So, perhaps the authors are confusing these ancient sea-peoples with the modern day Arab Palestinians and therefore attributing to them an ancient link with the land. But this is an inexcusable error from so-called scholars.  Let it be stated once and for all (if only) that today's Philistia, otherwise known as Gaza, is illegally occupied by a hybrid people who chose to call themselves Palestinian in 1964. In short, the invention of the indigenous Palestinian, constantly referred to by the authors, is pure myth and is nothing but a weapon devised by the Arab world in the hope of destroying the Jewish State of Israel.

 

The briefest research would have alerted the authors' suspicions regarding the authenticity of these people because they would soon have stumbled over the fact that not only is there no specific Palestinian history or culture but neither have there been any concrete archeological finds to validate their claim to the land. The binding agent between these recently-invented people is their zeal in implementing the Koranic injunction to dominate every culture in which they come into contact and soon thereafter to re-write history to suit their purposes. This manifesto, posing as a great world religion, begins and ends with Israel, the despised Jews whom their so-called sacred literature describe as 'apes and pigs'. The 4,000 year struggle between Jacob and Esau goes on.

 

The following fact may also be unknown to the authors: Israel is about the size of Wales, much less than a third of the authors' homeland of Scotland. But unlike Scotland, Israel is not surrounded by tempestuous but otherwise indifferent seas, but by an Islamic-dominated landmass a thousand times its size, containing some 422 million people the vast majority of whom long for the day when the Jews are no more.  Yet we are expected to sympathise with supposedly dispossessed Arabs.

 

And what of the origin of the Arab Naqba, the Day of the Catastrophe to which the authors refer? 

 

Five Arab nations declared a war of annihilation in 1948 on the fledgling State of Israel promising the Arab inhabitants of the land, who were not at that time even called Palestinians, certain victory and advising them to vacate their homes until the Jews were exterminated. The Jews invited the Arabs to stay and to continue living alongside them until the war was settled, and those that did stay have children and grandchildren in the land to this very day.  However, an estimated 700,000 took the advice of their Arab 'deliverers' and vacated their homes to await the destruction of the Jews, a destruction that never came. Their descendants can be found intermarried with the other races that go to make up the inhabitants of Gaza and the so-called West Bank. The true catastrophe for them was in preferring Arab promises over that of Jewish guidance.

 

An interesting fact is that practically exactly the same amount of Jews, 700,000, were made refugees by the Arab nations at this time and yet we don't have a Jewish refugee problem, only a Palestinian refugee problem. The reason is that the Jewish State, dirt-poor at the time and struggling for survival, nonetheless welcomed their fellow Jews with open arms. It was a shame that the Arab nations didn't do the same for their brothers who had fled the land on their advice, preferring to use them as pawns in a bigger game. 

 

Space forbids us to address fully the subject of ethnic cleansing that the authors sneeringly suggest God 'apparently' instructed the Jews to carry out during Biblical times.  Suffice it to say that, if any of the Canaanite child-sacrificing tribes present in the land forsook the depressingly-named Roasting Place, Tophet, and behaved themselves like civilised people, they were permitted to remain. Modern day Israel is a testimony to this in that Christians, Copts, Muslims, Zoroastrians, Bahaists, et al, live together with the Jewish majority, untroubled by authorities. Do the authors think for one wild second that, if the land was turned over to the Arabs, all these groups would be permitted to live together?  Can pigs fly?  The notion is laughable and the Muslim-only lands of the Middle East and Africa illustrate clearly who are the ones guilty of ethnic cleansing.  In southern Sudan alone I understand that an unbelievable 7 million souls have perished by the sword of Islam in recent decades.

 

Enough said on this desolate subject.

 

One final observation, our advice to anyone who is a member of the Church of Scotland: If the overall premise of this Report is officially accepted, namely, that the Jews have no right to the Land of Israel, then we would advise you to put your trust in the God of Israel and leave the establishment. This Report is a form of curse on the descendants of Abraham and will inevitably bring a curse on those who are associated with it.